After Centuries Of Stealing Land, The U.S. Govt Is Actually Inviting Tribes To Help

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Last April, in a farm field in eastern Virginia, Ann Richardson gathered with a few hundred people for a celebration. It wasn’t a party, though. Several people were crying. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland was there. She was crying, too.

“I can’t really describe it,” Richardson said of that day’s event, which took place along the shores of the Rappahannock River. “Incredible. Surreal. Emotional.”

“I felt like we were surrounded by ancestors who had lived there thousands of years ago. We were standing in their hopes and their dreams for their people.”

Richardson is the chief of the Rappahannock Tribe, and on that Friday afternoon, her tribe took back more than 460 acres of ancestral land along the river that shares her tribe’s name. Last month, her tribe reclaimed another 960 acres of its homeland, too.

It took 350 years. It took survival, after her tribe was forced off of its homeland by English settlers in the 1600s, virtually erased by white supremacists in the 1900s and endured centuries of persecution sanctioned by the U.S. government.


Since President Joe Biden took office, Haaland and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack have signed off on nearly two dozen co-stewardship agreements with tribes. There are another 60 co-stewardship agreements in various stages of review involving 45 tribes. Haaland and Vilsack launched this effort in November 2021 with a joint secretarial order directing relevant agencies to make sure their decisions on public lands fulfilled trust obligations with tribes. In November 2022, the Commerce Department signed onto their order as well.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/centuries-stealing-land-u-govt-103022120.html
 
Why do they deserve it? How far back do we go with this? Conquest of land in war and political disputes is common. So, I ask again, how far back do we go? What does the Rappahannock Tribe have as proof this was their land as opposed to some other tribe in the area, or to it at all? Were the Rappahannock actively doing something with this land or is this another "sacred ground" thing where they are making some vapid, vacuous claim based on nothing that somehow this was "their" land?
 
Why do they deserve it? How far back do we go with this? Conquest of land in war and political disputes is common. So, I ask again, how far back do we go? What does the Rappahannock Tribe have as proof this was their land as opposed to some other tribe in the area, or to it at all? Were the Rappahannock actively doing something with this land or is this another "sacred ground" thing where they are making some vapid, vacuous claim based on nothing that somehow this was "their" land?

And if it was their land it was only until another tribe came along and decided it was their land and they fought over it.
 
Why do they deserve it? How far back do we go with this? Conquest of land in war and political disputes is common. So, I ask again, how far back do we go? What does the Rappahannock Tribe have as proof this was their land as opposed to some other tribe in the area, or to it at all? Were the Rappahannock actively doing something with this land or is this another "sacred ground" thing where they are making some vapid, vacuous claim based on nothing that somehow this was "their" land?
I don’t understand why righting our wrongs is so offensive to you.
 
Why do they deserve it? How far back do we go with this? Conquest of land in war and political disputes is common. So, I ask again, how far back do we go? What does the Rappahannock Tribe have as proof this was their land as opposed to some other tribe in the area, or to it at all? Were the Rappahannock actively doing something with this land or is this another "sacred ground" thing where they are making some vapid, vacuous claim based on nothing that somehow this was "their" land?

Giving them 460 acres is less than a square mile of land, utterly insignificant, totally symbolic

I am sure that is only a tiny, miniscule fraction of the lands their ancestors lived on.
 
Why do they deserve it? How far back do we go with this? Conquest of land in war and political disputes is common. So, I ask again, how far back do we go? What does the Rappahannock Tribe have as proof this was their land as opposed to some other tribe in the area, or to it at all? Were the Rappahannock actively doing something with this land or is this another "sacred ground" thing where they are making some vapid, vacuous claim based on nothing that somehow this was "their" land?

We know you do not care. You could have saved the work of typing. American Indians were treated badly from the beginning and still are. We should do much better.
 
We know you do not care. You could have saved the work of typing. American Indians were treated badly from the beginning and still are. We should do much better.

I know right? What a shame

Foxwoods Casino, Ledyard Connecticut. The horror
 
So, you approve of how the US government lied to the indigenous people. Good to know.

In some cases they did. In others, not so much. For example, the Great Lakes tribes united behind Tecumseh during the War of 1812 and sided with the British. When that war ended, and the US was still intact, the Great Lakes tribes got screwed because they were on the losing side. That's how wars worked at the time, and it was their mistake for being on the wrong side.
 
We know you do not care. You could have saved the work of typing. American Indians were treated badly from the beginning and still are. We should do much better.

Actually, some were some weren't. Many of the tribes on the East Coast were all-too-willing to take sides in European wars that extended to the Americas. The French and Indian War (against the British) for example. The French lost in the Americas, and so did their Indian allies. The Indians got the same sort of treatment losing countries in Europe would get from a war.

On the other hand, the Cherokee got screwed by Andrew Jackson totally and undeservedly.
 
In 2020, the number of people who identified as Native American and Alaska Native (AIAN) alone and in combination with another race was 9.7 million, up from 5.2 million in 2010. They now account for 2.9% of all the people living in the United States, according to the Census Bureau.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/19/us/census-native-americans-rise-population/index.html

No doubt the number would be much higher when asked now....people are not stupid....nor are people very honest now....they will tend to give the most profitable answer.
 
Back
Top