cancel2 2022
Canceled
I am baffled as to how there were only six jurors were on that jury and they were all women, five white and one Hispanic.
Florida law only requires six jurors and it was the prosecution who loaded the jury with women thinking that women would be more sympathetic to their arguments since a teenage child was killed.I am baffled as to how there were only six jurors were on that jury and they were all women, five white and one Hispanic.
So does that mean it's open season on nigers in Florida?They were wrong. A teenaged thug was killed in self-defense.
So does that mean it's open season on nigers in Florida?
Duh!! Because I've read your posts.Tell me again why you think I'm ignorant and bigoted.
Duh!! Because I've read your posts.
So does that mean it's open season on nigers in Florida?
God damnit Yurt I was being sarcastic and you know it!I guess you found none of mine this intelligent?
Shut up niger.No, we don't know it. Stop dropping N-Bombs, Mott.
Florida law only requires six jurors and it was the prosecution who loaded the jury with women thinking that women would be more sympathetic to their arguments since a teenage child was killed.
How do you know that? Is that what you assume they did, or is that what the prosecution said they did? I do not know how anyone can live in this country and not notice that a majority of white women vote in racial rather than gender solidarity...who would be surprised their racial solidarity trumped their identity as mothers? (assuming they are mothers).
I never saw the gender as meaning shit. I saw all white and couldn't frigging believe it from the start. THis is so fucking 1960. I am not one who believed he would be convicted - I knew there would have to be at least one or two stone cold racists on that particulary jury, considering its demographics. I figured hung jury. I am slightly surprised they managed to seat six actual stone cold racists...and that the prosecution didn't see that...supposedly. (misfeasance or malfeasance...)
But I am not that surprised.
The defense was lucky this trial didn't happen at the wrong time of the month.
I believe that all the women were middle aged.
That was an opinion of some so called jury expert on CNN.How do you know that? Is that what you assume they did, or is that what the prosecution said they did? I do not know how anyone can live in this country and not notice that a majority of white women vote in racial rather than gender solidarity...who would be surprised their racial solidarity trumped their identity as mothers? (assuming they are mothers).
I never saw the gender as meaning shit. I saw all white and couldn't frigging believe it from the start. THis is so fucking 1960. I am not one who believed he would be convicted - I knew there would have to be at least one or two stone cold racists on that particulary jury, considering its demographics. I figured hung jury. I am slightly surprised they managed to seat six actual stone cold racists...and that the prosecution didn't see that...supposedly. (misfeasance or malfeasance...)
But I am not that surprised.
I am baffled as to how there were only six jurors were on that jury and they were all women, five white and one Hispanic.
So does that mean it's open season on nigers in Florida?