Amy Coney Barrett wiki edits

Evmetro

New member
Ten points go to whoever can post the number of times wikipedia has edited their article about Amy Coney Barrett since RBG checked out.
 
Barrett is a cultist who should be questioned on her religious cult "The People of Praise". The constitution gives us freedom from religion too,. The law should not be filtered though a judges religious beliefs. When religion is an outsized part of a persons life, they should be questioned about it. It can be disqualifying.
 
Barrett is a cultist who should be questioned on her religious cult "The People of Praise". The constitution gives us freedom from religion too,. The law should not be filtered though a judges religious beliefs. When religion is an outsized part of a persons life, they should be questioned about it. It can be disqualifying.

How many times do you think the wiki article on her has been updated since RGB checked out?
 
Ten points go to whoever can post the number of times wikipedia has edited their article about Amy Coney Barrett since RBG checked out.

Wiki entries get edited all the time. Nothing new.

This article is about a person involved in a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be unreliable. The last updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. Please feel free to improve this article (but note that updates without valid and reliable references will be removed) or discuss changes on the talk page. (September 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Unbalanced scales.svg
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met.
 

I am floored. This demonstrates that you read and understood the opening post! I am not used to seeing lefties respond appropriately to opening posts.

I just went to the article and clicked on revision history, and the selected batches of 500 revision results. I ended up scrolling through 2 1/2 batches before getting to when Ginsburg checked out. Looks like about 1250 revisions since Ginsberg.

I have an award that I give to lefties who post something that demonstrates that they read and understood an opening post, here is your award:

 
I'm unsure what you're trying to prove here, OP. Wikipedia is used by people all over the globe and of all political views.

If you want to play this game, we can look at the history of vandalism on Obama's and Clinton's pages.
 
I'm unsure what you're trying to prove here, OP. Wikipedia is used by people all over the globe and of all political views.

If you want to play this game, we can look at the history of vandalism on Obama's and Clinton's pages.

Do you think that it is common to revise an article about a person more than a thousand times per week? Why do you suppose there are so many revisions?
 
Do you think that it is common to revise an article about a person more than a thousand times per week? Why do you suppose there are so many revisions?

It usually happens to people of note. She went from obscurity to national fame overnight. Most of the "edits" are probably vandals, but the mods quickly undo the changes. If it gets really bad, the mods might temporarily freeze her page from edits like they did with Clinton's in 2016 and Obama's in 2008.
 
Back
Top