Are abstract objects real?

[IBDaMann]

If your definition of reality is physical material objects,

That's not his definition. The effects of gravity can be observed. Pi is an element of definition and pertains to science models, but there aren't any in nature that we can observe.

then ... dark energy are ...

Why should any rational adult believe in the "dark energy" hoax?

 

[Cypress]

That's what I wrote. Obviously you didn't understand.


How did you ever manage to acquire such a rapier wit?

I accept your confession you did not realize Pi is a constant of proportionality in some of the most important natural laws in physics, which are very real.

Darwin's theory of evolution is not science

hint: energy and matter are not interchangeable

Wave-Particle duality is classical physics.

There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!

 

[IBDaMann]

I accept your confession you did not realize Pi is a constant of proportionality in some of the most important natural laws in physics, which are very real.

Thank you for emphasizing the common theme in this thread which is that you don't understand the difference between a system and a model of a system. "Natural laws" are models. They aren't nature; they model nature.

How do you these zingers come to you? Do you just think of them?

 

[Cypress]

Thank you

^^^
Plagiarizer, bad faith poster, scientific illiterate -->


CLICK HERE to see how IBDumbass fantasizes that he has deeply original, profound insights about science and religion, but he is actually just plagiarizing and paraphrasing insights that other people have already had for many years

CLICK HERE To See Why IBDumbass Doesn't Post in Good Faith - He hounds me with what he imagines is a 'gotcha!' question, but when it blows up in his face he runs away from the thread like a little girl

Darwin's theory of evolution is not science

hint: energy and matter are not interchangeable

Wave-Particle duality is classical physics.

There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!

 

[IBDaMann]

Plagiarizer,

Do you have any examples? As far as I know, you are the only plagiarist here. All of your posts are the regurgitations of someone else's original thoughts.

This one cracked me up. It's your best quote yet!

 

[Cypress]

^^^
Doesn't realize the cosmos is organized on a presice mathmatical basis obeying natural laws which are very real

Darwin's theory of evolution is not science

hint: energy and matter are not interchangeable

Wave-Particle duality is classical physics.

There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!

 

[IBDaMann]

Doesn't realize the cosmos is organized on a presice mathmatical basis obeying natural laws which are very real

Too funny. Literally post after post, Cypress demonstrates that he doesn't know the difference between a system and a model of that system ... *and* ... he doesn't realize that all laws of science are models, not nature themselves.

I don't think there's any 12-step program to address someone that fucked-up. I suppose that all we can do is to humor him and try to keep him comfortable.

Now this is clever. Only you could have thought of this.

 

[Cypress]

Actually believes the cosmos is not organized on mathmatical patterns -->

^^^
Plagiarizer, bad faith poster, scientific illiterate


CLICK HERE to see how IBDumbass fantasizes that he has deeply original, profound insights about science and religion, but he is actually just plagiarizing and paraphrasing insights that other people have already had for many years

CLICK HERE To See Why IBDumbass Doesn't Post in Good Faith - He hounds me with what he imagines is a 'gotcha!' question, but when it blows up in his face he runs away from the thread like a little girl

Darwin's theory of evolution is not science

hint: energy and matter are not interchangeable

Wave-Particle duality is classical physics.

There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!