Are Democrats a cult?

[Into the Night]

To discuss whether Democrats are a cult.

To begin, let's look at the meaning of 'cult'.

This word came into the English lexicon around the 1600's from Latin 'cultus' meaning care of labor; a cultivation or culture; typically with a religious overtone.
Today, it's often associated with primitive or ancient forms of worship. This stems from the French 'culte', another contribution to the meaning of the word 'cult'.

There are many religions of Democrats, including the Church of Green, the Church of the Ozone Hole, the Church of Global Warming, the Church of Covid, the Church of Hate, the Church of Deviancy, the Church of the EV, the Church of Karl Marx, the Church of No God, etc. All of these deny science, mathematics, history, and traditional religions.

On this basis alone, it could be argued that to be a Democrat is to believe in primitive religions, thus satisfying the term 'cult'.

And now...?

 

[LichGold]

Www.Nambla.org

 

[AProudLefty]

To discuss whether Democrats are a cult.

To begin, let's look at the meaning of 'cult'.

This word came into the English lexicon around the 1600's from Latin 'cultus' meaning care of labor; a cultivation or culture; typically with a religious overtone.
Today, it's often associated with primitive or ancient forms of worship. This stems from the French 'culte', another contribution to the meaning of the word 'cult'.

There are many religions of Democrats, including the Church of Green, the Church of the Ozone Hole, the Church of Global Warming, the Church of Covid, the Church of Hate, the Church of Deviancy, the Church of the EV, the Church of Karl Marx, the Church of No God, etc. All of these deny science, mathematics, history, and traditional religions.

On this basis alone, it could be argued that to be a Democrat is to believe in primitive religions, thus satisfying the term 'cult'.

And now...?

They are not religions. You made up the labels.

 

[LichGold]

They are not religions. You made up the labels.

Transyism is a religious belief.

 

[Into the Night]

They are not religions. You made up the labels.

I did make up the labels. That does not exclude that they are religions. Fundamentalist style religions.

Like all religions, each one is based on an Argument of Faith, otherwise known as a circular argument (not itself a fallacy). Fundamentalists try to prove their religion True. That is the Circular Argument Fallacy, which is what a fundamentalist does.

Let's just take one of them: The Church of Global Warming, which routinely discards theories of science and mathematics in favor of it's own faith.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You can't create energy out of nothing.

 

[AProudLefty]

I did make up the labels.

Thanks for admitting.

That does not exclude that they are religions.

What God(s) do they worship?

Fundamentalist style religions.

They do not "preach". No fundamentalism.

Like all religions, each one is based on an Argument of Faith, otherwise known as a circular argument (not itself a fallacy). Fundamentalists try to prove their religion True. That is the Circular Argument Fallacy, which is what a fundamentalist does.

They do not worship any deity. They follow science.

 

[LichGold]

They do not worship any deity. They follow science.

Some how doesn't understand that's not science and also a religion itself. You do both science and religion, all wrong.

 

[Into the Night]

Thanks for admitting.

No problem.

What God(s) do they worship?

A religion does not require a god or gods.

They do not "preach". No fundamentalism.

Lie. They preach. They try to prove their religion True (fundamentalism).

They do not worship any deity. They follow science.

The Church of Global Warming denies and discards science.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

 

[Into the Night]

Some how doesn't understand that's not science and also a religion itself. You do both science and religion, all wrong.

He has already just discarded the 1st law of thermodynamics (again).

 

[AProudLefty]

No problem.

Are you going to quit inventing things after your admission?

A religion does not require a god or gods.

Yes it does. It's in the definition.

Lie. They preach. They try to prove their religion True (fundamentalism).

What preaching? You are preaching Trump's MAGA fundamentalism.

The Church of Global Warming denies and discards science.

You admitted you invented the label. There is no Church of Global Warming.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

Nobody claimed that gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

You are preaching the Church of Climate Change Hoax.

 

[Into the Night]

Are you going to quit inventing things after your admission?

No, I will continue inventing things. They are worth money for my business. What has got to do with religions of the Left?

Yes it does. It's in the definition.

No, it isn't. A religion does not require a god or gods.

What preaching?

Now you claim you are unfamiliar with the scripture of the Church of Global Warming??

You are preaching Trump's MAGA fundamentalism.

An acronym is not a religion.

You admitted you invented the label.

So?

There is no Church of Global Warming.

There certainly is! You even tried to defend it!

Nobody claimed that gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

You did. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

You are preaching the Church of Climate Change Hoax.

Climate cannot change. Now you try to deny the religion you JUST TRIED TO DEFEND??? Your word games won't work, LeftNut.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

 

[AProudLefty]

No, I will continue inventing things. They are worth money for my business. What has got to do with religions of the Left?

You're a paid shill?

No, it isn't. A religion does not require a god or gods.

Now you claim you are unfamiliar with the scripture of the Church of Global Warming??

An acronym is not a religion.

So?

So your inventions do not exist.

There certainly is! You even tried to defend it!

You admitted you invented it. Also admitted you were being paid to do so.

You did. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

Imagining posts that arent there again?

Climate cannot change. Now you try to deny the religion you JUST TRIED TO DEFEND??? Your word games won't work, LeftNut.

Your denial of science is noted.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

Who claimed that?

 

[Into the Night]

You're a paid shill?

I was, but I no longer work in the casino business. What has this got to do with the Church of Global Warming?

So your inventions do not exist.

Yes they do.

You admitted you invented it. Also admitted you were being paid to do so.

I get paid for some of my inventions, yes. What has this got to do with the Church of Global Warming?

Imagining posts that arent there again?

Random phrase ignored.

Your denial of science is noted.

Random phrase ignored. Inversion fallacy.

Who claimed that?

You did. So do other Democrats. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

 

[AProudLefty]

I was, but I no longer work in the casino business. What has this got to do with the Church of Global Warming?

You admitted that you are paid to lie and invent things about Democrats.

Yes they do.

No they do not. No Democrats have ever called them by your labels.

I get paid for some of my inventions, yes. What has this got to do with the Church of Global Warming?

Admitting once again that you are being paid to invent things about Democrsts.

Random phrase ignored.

Random phrase ignored. Inversion fallacy.

You did. So do other Democrats. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!

There is no such claim. Only in your paid invention.

 

[LichGold]

Democrats are more appropriately called NAMBLAcrats. They have nothing to do with democracy and everything to do with NAMBLA.org Including and especially hoarding the jewish lawyers that defend it. 50% ADL lawyers.

 

[anonymoose]

Yes it does. It's in the definition.

Do you consider Buddhism a religion?

 

[AProudLefty]

Do you consider Buddhism a religion?

I consider it to be a philosophy.

 

[anonymoose]

I consider it to be a philosophy.

Buddhism is widely recognized as a religion due to its spiritual practices, ethical systems, and communal structures, even if it lacks a creator god. Its philosophical and psychological elements make it unique, but these don’t exclude it from the religious category—rather, they broaden how we understand religion itself.

https://grok.com/c/b30b7687-34bc-4566-b73b-cdfa436dec2f

 

[AProudLefty]

Buddhism is widely recognized as a religion due to its spiritual practices, ethical systems, and communal structures, even if it lacks a creator god. Its philosophical and psychological elements make it unique, but these don’t exclude it from the religious category—rather, they broaden how we understand religion itself.

https://grok.com/c/b30b7687-34bc-4566-b73b-cdfa436dec2f

Okay? It is both a philosophy and a religion (some of them worship deities).

 

[anonymoose]

Okay? It is both a philosophy and a religion (some of them worship deities).

So is Christianity as well as most all religions.