Are Republicans hiding Hunter Biden evidence?

archives

Verified User
“GOP is withholding evidence contradicting claims in Hunter Biden probe”

“WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats are demanding the release of a transcript from a new FBI witness that they say contradicts Republicans’ claims in the expanding congressional inquiry into President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.”

“Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on House Oversight Committee, sent a letter Friday to Rep. James Comer, the Republican chair of the committee, asking him to produce the transcribed interview this month with an FBI agent who worked on the investigation into the younger Biden’s taxes and foreign business dealings. The witness was interviewed on July 17.”

“The Maryland lawmaker claimed the closed-door interview with the unidentified agent conducted by committee staff “directly undermined” testimony released by Republicans last month from two IRS whistleblowers who allege that the Justice Department interfered with their yearslong investigation into Hunter Biden.”

“House rules allow only the majority party to release transcribed interviews from a committee investigation, meaning minority Democrats have no direct power over the matter.”

https://apnews.com/article/hunter-b...istleblowers-2042e6e755d0322d07fc42b71705f6d5

Poor guy is probably requesting not to have his testimony revealed in fear of death threats. If the real media was like Murdoch they’d be out there offering to pay the guy to make appearances on all the Fox pimp’s shows

So why hasn’t the GOP revealed the guy’s testimony?

So much for the transparency bullshit, and little Jimmy Jordan will go on Fox and echo “Americans have a right to know,” evidently only if it supports the innuendo they are creating
 
more whataboutism...........while the two sides of left and right squabble over who done what more, the nation is slowly dying. congrats.

and spare us the 'where's the evidence' crap. that's just an attempt to deflect. you show more willful ignorance by doing that instead of using your common sense.
 
more whataboutism...........while the two sides of left and right squabble over who done what more, the nation is slowly dying. congrats.

and spare us the 'where's the evidence' crap. that's just an attempt to deflect. you show more willful ignorance by doing that instead of using your common sense.


Good point, for a change, by STY--whether it was intentional or not.

"Where's the evidence?" is indeed the wrong attitude, here.
The logical attitude is, "Who gives a fuck?"
 
Good point, for a change, by STY--whether it was intentional or not.

"Where's the evidence?" is indeed the wrong attitude, here.
The logical attitude is, "Who gives a fuck?"

If this involved a republican president and son, you'd be giving a fuck. there is nothing logical about that attitude.
 
“GOP is withholding evidence contradicting claims in Hunter Biden probe”

“WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats are demanding the release of a transcript from a new FBI witness that they say contradicts Republicans’ claims in the expanding congressional inquiry into President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.”

“Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on House Oversight Committee, sent a letter Friday to Rep. James Comer, the Republican chair of the committee, asking him to produce the transcribed interview this month with an FBI agent who worked on the investigation into the younger Biden’s taxes and foreign business dealings. The witness was interviewed on July 17.”

“The Maryland lawmaker claimed the closed-door interview with the unidentified agent conducted by committee staff “directly undermined” testimony released by Republicans last month from two IRS whistleblowers who allege that the Justice Department interfered with their yearslong investigation into Hunter Biden.”

“House rules allow only the majority party to release transcribed interviews from a committee investigation, meaning minority Democrats have no direct power over the matter.”

https://apnews.com/article/hunter-b...istleblowers-2042e6e755d0322d07fc42b71705f6d5

Poor guy is probably requesting not to have his testimony revealed in fear of death threats. If the real media was like Murdoch they’d be out there offering to pay the guy to make appearances on all the Fox pimp’s shows

So why hasn’t the GOP revealed the guy’s testimony?

So much for the transparency bullshit, and little Jimmy Jordan will go on Fox and echo “Americans have a right to know,” evidently only if it supports the innuendo they are creating
This is probably like Schiff's we have Direct Evidence of Trump's collusion.
 
If this involved a republican president and son, you'd be giving a fuck. there is nothing logical about that attitude.


We've turned the presidency into some sort of trashy reality show [apt description for all reality shows, btw].

As constituents, we don't even need to know who the president's fucking family even is--

his kids, his wife, his dogs, his mistress, his golf buddies--

none of it is any of our fucking business. NONE OF IT.

All we need is a president who stays the fuck off television and effectively PRESIDES over his cabinet, i.e., does his actual fucking job.

We've turned our entire culture and society into a pop culture artifact,
and only the very most intelligent among us seem to be embarrassed by it.
 
We've turned the presidency into some sort of trashy reality show [apt description for all reality shows, btw].

As constituents, we don't even need to know who the president's fucking family even is--

his kids, his wife, his dogs, his mistress, his golf buddies--

none of it is any of our fucking business. NONE OF IT.

All we need is a president who stays the fuck off television and effectively PRESIDES over his cabinet, i.e., does his actual fucking job.

We've turned our entire culture and society into a pop culture artifact,
and only the very most intelligent among us seem to be embarrassed by it.

I'll give you all this. This is what SHOULD be happening. IF the president actually does their job.

we don't have that though and I remember from a previous post that you don't care at all if a president is corrupt and enriches themselves and their family at your expense, just so long as he provides you with some of what you want.

call me crazy, but that's just wrong on so many levels.
 
I'll give you all this. This is what SHOULD be happening. IF the president actually does their job.

we don't have that though and I remember from a previous post that you don't care at all if a president is corrupt and enriches themselves and their family at your expense, just so long as he provides you with some of what you want.

call me crazy, but that's just wrong on so many levels.


You interpreted my remarks to mean that I don't care.

What I meant was that corruptions costs us millions while bad policy costa us trillions.

First, institute good policies with capable people.

Then find a way to control the difference
between the normal perks of the powerful
and outright corruption.
 
more whataboutism...........while the two sides of left and right squabble over who done what more, the nation is slowly dying. congrats.

and spare us the 'where's the evidence' crap. that's just an attempt to deflect. you show more willful ignorance by doing that instead of using your common sense.

Ah, no, that is a cop out, the right is making their case against Hunter based on what individuals said, not proof they offered, but on what they said, and if they were actually looking for the truth, they’d include everything everyone said, even those that refute the testimony of the suppose whistleblowers

Not a deflection, the truth
 
If this involved a republican president and son, you'd be giving a fuck. there is nothing logical about that attitude.

Wait a minute, but you “don’t give a fuck” that Comer refuses to release the testimony of an individual who may negate the whistleblowers testimony. Can’t have it both ways
 
The private life of a president is extremely relevant. They can be compromised and harm our Republic.

Presidents can be blackmailed and harm our Republic.

When did we stop expecting holders of our highest elective office to be examples of integrity and honesty?

Affirmative action at the VP level and other high governmental positions…a plan for disaster.
 
You interpreted my remarks to mean that I don't care.

What I meant was that corruptions costs us millions while bad policy costa us trillions.

First, institute good policies with capable people.

Then find a way to control the difference
between the normal perks of the powerful
and outright corruption.
“…Costa”, um…
 
You interpreted my remarks to mean that I don't care.

What I meant was that corruptions costs us millions while bad policy costa us trillions.

First, institute good policies with capable people.

Then find a way to control the difference
between the normal perks of the powerful
and outright corruption.

in other words, until you get what YOU want, you don't care.
 
Ah, no, that is a cop out, the right is making their case against Hunter based on what individuals said, not proof they offered, but on what they said, and if they were actually looking for the truth, they’d include everything everyone said, even those that refute the testimony of the suppose whistleblowers

Not a deflection, the truth

the very same was done with hillary.............you didn't care. so 'whataboutism' is all you have and the cop out is yours to bear, not mine.
 
The private life of a president is extremely relevant. They can be compromised and harm our Republic.

Presidents can be blackmailed and harm our Republic.

When did we stop expecting holders of our highest elective office to be examples of integrity and honesty?

Affirmative action at the VP level and other high governmental positions…a plan for disaster.

None of which has anything to do with the thread
 
the very same was done with hillary.............you didn't care. so 'whataboutism' is all you have and the cop out is yours to bear, not mine.

Got nothing to do with Hillary, and asking why Comer refuses to release the testimony of the person who testified is not a whataboutism, it is a straight forward, relevant question
 
Got nothing to do with Hillary, and asking why Comer refuses to release the testimony of the person who testified is not a whataboutism, it is a straight forward, relevant question

it has EVERYTHING to do with whataboutism.........you're simply ignoring that to focus on the evil YOU need to.....not all of it. that is all that matters. You want republicans investigated, charged, tried, and convicted with little to no serious impartiality, but to you, there had better be the most objective and impartial investigation, if there is one, when it concerns a democrat. that exposes you as nothing more than a partisan idiot who will happily accept corruption among democrats, just so long as they keep going after republicans.
 
“GOP is withholding evidence contradicting claims in Hunter Biden probe”

“WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats are demanding the release of a transcript from a new FBI witness that they say contradicts Republicans’ claims in the expanding congressional inquiry into President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden.”

“Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on House Oversight Committee, sent a letter Friday to Rep. James Comer, the Republican chair of the committee, asking him to produce the transcribed interview this month with an FBI agent who worked on the investigation into the younger Biden’s taxes and foreign business dealings. The witness was interviewed on July 17.”

“The Maryland lawmaker claimed the closed-door interview with the unidentified agent conducted by committee staff “directly undermined” testimony released by Republicans last month from two IRS whistleblowers who allege that the Justice Department interfered with their yearslong investigation into Hunter Biden.”

“House rules allow only the majority party to release transcribed interviews from a committee investigation, meaning minority Democrats have no direct power over the matter.”

https://apnews.com/article/hunter-b...istleblowers-2042e6e755d0322d07fc42b71705f6d5

Poor guy is probably requesting not to have his testimony revealed in fear of death threats. If the real media was like Murdoch they’d be out there offering to pay the guy to make appearances on all the Fox pimp’s shows

So why hasn’t the GOP revealed the guy’s testimony?

So much for the transparency bullshit, and little Jimmy Jordan will go on Fox and echo “Americans have a right to know,” evidently only if it supports the innuendo they are creating

Jamie Raskin is not merely a repugnant, lying moron, but he also has ZERO credibility with anyone having half a brain. This is the same douchebag that gave us Russia Russia Collusion lies too.

You have to be a brain dead hack to parrot what that boorish dumbass says. :palm:
 
Back
Top