Bottom line: United Nations scum will never surrender their newfound absolute authority to control behavior, not only here but worldwide. Absolute authority is now in the hands of a few thousand elected officials starting with President Trump and going down to governors, mayors, local bureaucrats, and police departments. Naturally, the SCOTUS relish every coronavirus dictate.
New World Order filth were floored when they saw how many Americans could be frightened into surrendering their liberty on nothing more than the word of medical industry parasites hustling TRILLIONS of tax dollars. Had the scum known how it easy it is they would have done it decades ago.
New World Order filth were floored when they saw how many Americans could be frightened into surrendering their liberty on nothing more than the word of medical industry parasites hustling TRILLIONS of tax dollars. Had the scum known how it easy it is they would have done it decades ago.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ys-The-Incremental-Card&p=3560244#post3560244
Move the cursor to 4:20 and listen to Tucker Carlson’s questions:
VIDEO ▼
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6148696687001?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips
Neither Carlson nor any media mouth will ask the right questions. The answers are verboten. I know the answers.
There are many branches of one conspiracy aimed at achieving the same goal. The federal government’s unconstitutional control of education is one. Taking on every conspiracy in detail fills volumes. Communist attacks on private property alone would fill a library.
The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property. Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820 – 1895)
I want to put together a few observations on one branch of the conspiracy that has been evolving from the root problem.
Governments ordering their citizens how to behave began with the first government. To be precise the same personality types went into every government throughout history.
Americans do not have to go back that far to see the steps the scum in our federal government take to impose the tax collector’s morality on a free people. Basically, YOU MUST NOT morphed into DO AS I TELL YOU TO DO.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said that the individual health insurance mandates included in every health reform bill, which require Americans to have insurance, were “like paying taxes.” He added that Congress has “broad authority” to force Americans to purchase other things as well, so long as it was trying to promote “the general welfare.”
The Congressional Budget Office, however, has stated in the past that a mandate forcing Americans to buy health insurance would be an “unprecedented form of federal action,” and that the “government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.”
The Congressional Budget Office, however, has stated in the past that a mandate forcing Americans to buy health insurance would be an “unprecedented form of federal action,” and that the “government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.”
Hoyer Says Constitution’s ‘General Welfare’ Clause Empowers Congress to Order Americans to Buy Health Insurance
October 21, 2009
By Matt COVER
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hoy...-clause-empowers-congress-order-americans-buy
October 21, 2009
By Matt COVER
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hoy...-clause-empowers-congress-order-americans-buy
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...e-Topic-News-Conspiracy&p=3547294#post3547294
Steny Hoyer overturning James Madison makes him the most arrogant parasite that was ever elected to Congress:
With respect to the two words ‘general welfare,’ I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. James Madison
If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to particular exceptions. James Madison, “Letter to Edmund Pendleton,”
If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to particular exceptions. James Madison, “Letter to Edmund Pendleton,”
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...rump-Bombs-Pearl-Harbor&p=3561972#post3561972
When Hoyer laid his finger on the General Welfare clause he invited millions of parasites from every corner of the world to come here and feed at the public trough. Even worse, Hoyers abuse of the General Welfare clause is only the beginning of his destruction.
The step taken by Steny Hoyer was essential in advancing the conspiracy’s objectives. Note that in the past month or so the coronavirus conspiracy was an extension of Hoyer’s contribution to enslaving a free people when every elected official and local bureaucrats in state and local governments usurped an unconstitutional privilege for the General Welfare. Not one law was passed to give them that privilege, nor has one law been passed to take it away. It is a privilege government personalty types will never relinquish anymore than scum like Hoyer, Pelosi, Schumer and their kind will renounce their definition of the General Welfare clause.
NOTE: Allowing involuntary servitude followed Obamacare:
No plaintiff’s lawyer ever fought his client’s case on the grounds of involuntary servitude:
VIII Amendment
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
XIII Amendment
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...2s-Brand-Of-Intolerance&p=2782041#post2782041
Parenthetically, our Founders created individual liberties. Every previous government had only to prevent liberty from taking root. From the beginning the parasites that infiltrated the federal government had to eliminate existing individual Rights. Hence, the federal government’s longest running conspiracy against the American people concentrated on eliminating the Right to work for one’s self. In little more than a century the XVI Amendment abolished the Right to keep the wealth an individual earned.
The first step in the conspiracy against individual liberties was engineered by Roman Catholic priests shortly after the original Bill of Rights was ratified:
In 1813 the Roman Catholic Church shot holes in the Constitution when priests were given the confessional-privilege. In plain English, priests got the opening they needed to legitimate coerced charity incrementally. (Doctors, lawyers, journalists, and psychiatrists followed priests with similar protections codified by politicians.)
Priests have been a pestilence infecting mankind from the day money was invented; so I would take the privilege away from priests first. If anyone is dumb enough to tell priests anything they do not deserve protection.
Priests have been a pestilence infecting mankind from the day money was invented; so I would take the privilege away from priests first. If anyone is dumb enough to tell priests anything they do not deserve protection.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...arasite-Class-Also-Celebrates-The-4th-Of-July
In simple terms, a special privilege given to specific personalty types loyal to the government logically takes a Right away from everybody else.
Finally, defenders of the U.S. Constitution on the High Court will never rule against dirty little moralists stuffing themselves with income tax dollars:
Supreme Court justices are creatures of the federal government; so predicting the outcome of Supreme Court cases involving tax dollars, and/or Wall Street’s income, is a walk in the park. No Supreme Court will ever decide to reduce or eliminate federal government revenues. In short: Repealing the ACA did not stand a chance when it got to the High Court.
Repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was a snap for most Americans BEFORE Chief Justice John Roberts said it was a constitutional tax.
Repealing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was a snap for most Americans BEFORE Chief Justice John Roberts said it was a constitutional tax.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...2t-What-They-Used-To-Be&p=2761678#post2761678
