Atheism Is Inconsistent with the Scientific Method, Physicist Says

"Into the Night", you are literally always wrong

Originally Posted by Cypress
A valid scientific theory, or more accurately a hypothesis, has to be testable and falsifiable.
Click to expand...
Into the Night said:
There is NO SUCH THING as a 'valid' scientific theory!
Click to expand...
"The two primary features of a scientific hypothesis are falsifiability and testability"
- Britannica Encyclopedia https://www.britannica.com/science/scientific-hypothesis


"Into the Night": Wrong literally all the bloody time>>
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...stians-are-anti-science&p=3901887#post3901887
 
Michael_Panetta said:
So we should all be agnostic about the existence of a tea cup orbiting Pluto?

Or a magic unicorn that lives on the sun?
Click to expand...

Atheism does not simply reject the claim that there is an old white guy with a white beard and flowing robe who lives in the clouds.

I know few Christians who believe in that cartoon version of religion.

Atheism overtly rejects the entire theistic notion that there is a purposeful creative force behind the design of the universe, and a spiritual realm outside the boundaries of our physical perception.

Nietzsche summed up atheism quite well when he rejected the religious possibility of a spiritual realm, and that the only meaning to life was to strive for creativity and imagination in this physical world.
 
Cypress said:
Atheism does not simply reject the claim that there is an old white guy with a white beard and flowing robe who lives in the clouds.

I know few Christians who believe in that cartoon version of religion.

Atheism overtly rejects the entire theistic notion that there is a purposeful creative force behind the design of the universe, and a spiritual realm outside the boundaries of our physical perception.

Nietzsche summed up atheism quite well when he rejected the religious possibility of a spiritual realm, and that the only meaning to life was to strive for creativity and imagination in this physical world.
Click to expand...

Nietzsche was correct.
 
Michael_Panetta said:
Nietzsche was correct.
Click to expand...
I do not think Nietzsche found what he was looking for, or discovered the meaning of life. He went insane and spent the last decade of his life in a state of madness.

Nietsche had some good insights about cultivating creativity, and was obviously a strong voice for atheism. But I always felt his philosophy of life tended towards nihilism, elitism, and rejection of objective morality.

Richard Dawkins fancies himself a militant atheist, and one of these days I am going to get around to reading his insights on atheism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top