Barr Hammers Abuse Of The Fifth Amendment

F

Flanders

Verified User
To me, AG Barr is a 50-50 kind of a guy. His speech to the Federal Society two days ago put him on the good guy side for the most part even though he failed to mention that the NEVER-RATIFIED XVI Amendment pays for everything that is going wrong with this country —— including enriching lawyers in the Federal Society.

I especially enjoyed Barr’s remarks about federal judges giving foreign combatants constitutional protection in civilian criminal courts. If you listen to nothing else move the cursor to 57:00 and enjoy:


Parenthetically, the legal profession is raking in tax dollars defending enemy soldiers in civilian courts. So you can bet that the United Nations teaches every enemy combatant in the world to recite this one by heart.
Fifth Amendment Miranda Rights


​
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.
​

Question: How many captured soldiers can afford high-priced civilian lawyers?
 
Barr's incendiary language and apparent adherence to conspiracies indicate how it was a bad mistake when he was approved for the AG. This is not how the AG is supposed to talk. He was approved to be America's lawyer and he quickly became Trump's. He is travelling the world looking for more conspiracy evidence. Who is the AG when he is gone?
 
Nordberg said:
Barr's incendiary language
Click to expand...

To Nordberg: Only to you and your kind.

Nordberg said:
He was approved to be America's lawyer
Click to expand...

To Nordberg: No he was not. The AG is the government’s lawyer —— primarily the government’s prosecutor.

Nordberg said:
He is travelling the world looking for more conspiracy evidence.
Click to expand...

To Nordberg: Barr need look no further than the Parasite Class’ conspiracy to promote Socialism/Communism with the income tax.

Flanders said:
". . . the NEVER-RATIFIED XVI Amendment pays for everything that is going wrong with this country . . ."
Click to expand...

Try this if you are looking for a conspiracy.

Democrat parasites makeup for a low corporate tax with the income tax FedEx employees pay:

The New York Times today took after FedEx for the sin of having a low corporate tax bill. Sample:

FedEx reaped big savings [from the Trump tax cut], bringing its effective tax rate from 34 percentin fiscal year 2017 to less than zero in fiscal year 2018, meaning that, overall, the government technically owed it money. But it did not increase investment in new equipment and other assets in the fiscal year that followed, as Mr. Smith said businesses like his would. . .


​
Posted on November 17, 2019 by Steven Hayward in Freedom, Media Bias, Taxes
FedEx Versus the NY Times

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/fedex-versus-the-ny-times.php
​
 
Oh, my kind. I know you are comfortable with that language because you use it. That is why your posts and threads are so easily dismissed. He is supposed to be the American head of Justice. He is not doing that job and you others of your ilk, are happy with the government becoming a new one, a dictatorship. Trump is above the law to you and I hope you learn otherwise. If not, we may be taking a bad direction , one that will make us a much worse place with police and government power oppressing us.
 
Flanders said:
To Nordberg: Only to you and your kind.



To Nordberg: No he was not. The AG is the government’s lawyer —— primarily the government’s prosecutor.



To Nordberg: Barr need look no further than the Parasite Class’ conspiracy to promote Socialism/Communism with the income tax.



Try this if you are looking for a conspiracy.

Democrat parasites makeup for a low corporate tax with the income tax FedEx employees pay:

The New York Times today took after FedEx for the sin of having a low corporate tax bill. Sample:

FedEx reaped big savings [from the Trump tax cut], bringing its effective tax rate from 34 percentin fiscal year 2017 to less than zero in fiscal year 2018, meaning that, overall, the government technically owed it money. But it did not increase investment in new equipment and other assets in the fiscal year that followed, as Mr. Smith said businesses like his would. . .


​
Posted on November 17, 2019 by Steven Hayward in Freedom, Media Bias, Taxes
FedEx Versus the NY Times

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/fedex-versus-the-ny-times.php
​
Click to expand...

Sounds like john birch talking points
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top