Ben Franklin's World

PoliTalker

Diversity Makes Greatness
This is a wonderful weekly podcast about early American history.

It has become a favorite pass time.

All of the previous shows are available for listening any time you wish.

They are approaching 300 shows!

If you'd like to know more about early America you might enjoy it.

Host Liz Covart interviews a different author each week, offering fabulous insights into the lives of those who forged our nation.

Enjoy!

Ben Franklin's World
 
You can go to the link and there is a search feature.

Open that up and enter a 3 digit number in the window.

Hit return and you can pull up any episode.

Start at the beginning if you wish. Enter ' 001 .'

I find it fabulous to get away from the screen, relax my eyes and body, and listen to the programs, just soaking up the knowledge of history.
 
I was never the world's fastest reader. I read books, but not constantly. They are such a time eater. I was always more of a doer than a reader.

I can listen to one of these podcasts while chillin and learn far more in the 30-40 minutes of the program than I could in hours of reading.

They way I see it, as an atheist, we find ourselves here on this planet, and we have a limited amount of time to enjoy being alive, and then we cease to exist.

Therefore, it is only logical to make the most of our allotted time. Reading is fine, but I can only do so much of it before I wanna get up and do something more physical.

These shows are great for soaking up a lotta knowledge in a short duration.

I am pretty much reaching the conclusion that this country was founded upon the pretense of a lot of ill intent, we broke away from the source of that, but the bad vibe remained and we have been trying to turn that energy around ever since.

This dichotomy will not be resolved any time soon.
 
I was never the world's fastest reader. I read books, but not constantly. They are such a time eater. I was always more of a doer than a reader.

I can listen to one of these podcasts while chillin and learn far more in the 30-40 minutes of the program than I could in hours of reading.

They way I see it, as an atheist, we find ourselves here on this planet, and we have a limited amount of time to enjoy being alive, and then we cease to exist.

Therefore, it is only logical to make the most of our allotted time. Reading is fine, but I can only do so much of it before I wanna get up and do something more physical.

These shows are great for soaking up a lotta knowledge in a short duration.

I am pretty much reaching the conclusion that this country was founded upon the pretense of a lot of ill intent, we broke away from the source of that, but the bad vibe remained and we have been trying to turn that energy around ever since.

This dichotomy will not be resolved any time soon.

Project 1619 bullshit.
 
I was never the world's fastest reader. I read books, but not constantly. They are such a time eater. I was always more of a doer than a reader.

I can listen to one of these podcasts while chillin and learn far more in the 30-40 minutes of the program than I could in hours of reading.

They way I see it, as an atheist, we find ourselves here on this planet, and we have a limited amount of time to enjoy being alive, and then we cease to exist.

Therefore, it is only logical to make the most of our allotted time. Reading is fine, but I can only do so much of it before I wanna get up and do something more physical.

These shows are great for soaking up a lotta knowledge in a short duration.

I am pretty much reaching the conclusion that this country was founded upon the pretense of a lot of ill intent, we broke away from the source of that, but the bad vibe remained and we have been trying to turn that energy around ever since.

This dichotomy will not be resolved any time soon.

About twenty years ago I decided that if I want to be broadly informed about a wide range of topics - history, religion, physics, genetics, philosophy, et al. - pod casts and video and audio short-courses were the way to go. It would take me many decades trying to acquire that knowlege reading books.

On the flipside, real expertise has to be acquired by textbooks and traditional academic coursework.
 
Hello Cypress,

About twenty years ago I decided that if I want to be broadly informed about a wide range of topics - history, religion, physics, genetics, philosophy, et al. - pod casts and video and audio short-courses were the way to go. It would take me many decades trying to acquire that knowlege reading books.

On the flipside, real expertise has to be acquired by textbooks and traditional academic coursework.

That's why I still read.

I like both formats of soaking up knowledge.

For years, I preferred to read only non-fiction.

Now I am about 50-50.

I am not fazed by daunting challenges.

Once, I took up reading the 1200 page Atlas Shrugged, just to find out what motivated so many conservatives. What a waste of time! Talk about an author badly in need of a good editor...

That book could have been a quarter of the length and accomplished the same effect. And I consider it pure trash. A laughable fantasy. I was SO glad to be done with that one, I didn't read for a year afterward.
 
Hello Cypress,



That's why I still read.

I like both formats of soaking up knowledge.

For years, I preferred to read only non-fiction.

Now I am about 50-50.

I am not fazed by daunting challenges.

Once, I took up reading the 1200 page Atlas Shrugged, just to find out what motivated so many conservatives. What a waste of time! Talk about an author badly in need of a good editor...

That book could have been a quarter of the length and accomplished the same effect. And I consider it pure trash. A laughable fantasy. I was SO glad to be done with that one, I didn't read for a year afterward.

Try "The Naked Communist".
 
Hello Cypress,



That's why I still read.

I like both formats of soaking up knowledge.

For years, I preferred to read only non-fiction.

Now I am about 50-50.

I am not fazed by daunting challenges.

Once, I took up reading the 1200 page Atlas Shrugged, just to find out what motivated so many conservatives. What a waste of time! Talk about an author badly in need of a good editor...

That book could have been a quarter of the length and accomplished the same effect. And I consider it pure trash. A laughable fantasy. I was SO glad to be done with that one, I didn't read for a year afterward.

The only book I ever read that was a thousand pages long was Dostoyevsky "Brothers Karamazov"

Ayn Rand was an egomaniac, but back in 1880 when Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy were writing, life moved at a slower pace and there were far fewer entertainment options. So I guess literate people then did not consider reading a thousand pages a daunting task.
 
Hello Cypress,

The only book I ever read that was a thousand pages long was Dostoyevsky "Brothers Karamazov"

Ayn Rand was an egomaniac, but back in 1880 when Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy were writing, life moved at a slower pace and there were far fewer entertainment options. So I guess literate people then did not consider reading a thousand pages a daunting task.

What other podcasts do you like?
 
Hello Cypress,



I ordered some DVD's from Great Courses. Liked 'em!

I'll check out the others.

Thanks.

If you want to save some money, most decent public library systems will have a collection of great courses DVDs or they will provide great courses content on the library's digital streaming service
 
Hello Cypress,

If you want to save some money, most decent public library systems will have a collection of great courses DVDs or they will provide great courses content on the library's digital streaming service

Did not know!

Love the library.

Mine also has tons of movies on DVD, free for checking out.
 
Hello Cypress,



That's why I still read.

I like both formats of soaking up knowledge.

For years, I preferred to read only non-fiction.

Now I am about 50-50.

I am not fazed by daunting challenges.

Once, I took up reading the 1200 page Atlas Shrugged, just to find out what motivated so many conservatives. What a waste of time! Talk about an author badly in need of a good editor...

That book could have been a quarter of the length and accomplished the same effect. And I consider it pure trash. A laughable fantasy. I was SO glad to be done with that one, I didn't read for a year afterward.

Ugh, that was a painful read. Finished it all, along with "The Fountainhead." What a strange and unworkable philosophy she had. You have to wonder about the mental health of those who embraced it.

I envy those like you with the ability to listen to and absorb podcasts and aural learning materials. Mr. Owl enjoys podcasts too. I'm far more visual. I really like the course I'm taking now, which is done via Zoom. The prof uses a combination of videos, Powerpoint sides, and lecture, along with the textbook. Lecture + visual seems to work well for me.
 
Hello ThatOwlWoman,

Ugh, that was a painful read. Finished it all, along with "The Fountainhead." What a strange and unworkable philosophy she had. You have to wonder about the mental health of those who embraced it.

I envy those like you with the ability to listen to and absorb podcasts and aural learning materials. Mr. Owl enjoys podcasts too. I'm far more visual. I really like the course I'm taking now, which is done via Zoom. The prof uses a combination of videos, Powerpoint sides, and lecture, along with the textbook. Lecture + visual seems to work well for me.

I remember how boring I found history back in school. And it was scheduled after lunch for me, when the human body would naturally prefer a nap. That was truly a challenge to fight my instinctive biorhythms and stay awake.

That's why I like the podcasts! It's like I'm back in history class, except now I don't get called out for falling asleep. I like to put them on when I go to bed. I have the computer set to auto-shut-off. I rarely hear the end of a podcast! It's GREAT. I learn a little, take my mind off everything from the day, and conk out.

Then, the next night, I put the same episode on and advance it as far as I can remember from the previous night, start from there, and let it keep going. It's PERFECT!
 
Ugh, that was a painful read. Finished it all, along with "The Fountainhead." What a strange and unworkable philosophy she had. You have to wonder about the mental health of those who embraced it.

I envy those like you with the ability to listen to and absorb podcasts and aural learning materials. Mr. Owl enjoys podcasts too. I'm far more visual. I really like the course I'm taking now, which is done via Zoom. The prof uses a combination of videos, Powerpoint sides, and lecture, along with the textbook. Lecture + visual seems to work well for me.
I agree.

While I enjoy audio learning while walking or exercising, the visuals of a video or graphic production enhance the experience.
 
Hello ThatOwlWoman,



I remember how boring I found history back in school. And it was scheduled after lunch for me, when the human body would naturally prefer a nap. That was truly a challenge to fight my instinctive biorhythms and stay awake.

That's why I like the podcasts! It's like I'm back in history class, except now I don't get called out for falling asleep. I like to put them on when I go to bed. I have the computer set to auto-shut-off. I rarely hear the end of a podcast! It's GREAT. I learn a little, take my mind off everything from the day, and conk out.

Then, the next night, I put the same episode on and advance it as far as I can remember from the previous night, start from there, and let it keep going. It's PERFECT!

Somewhere along the way, high school history instruction became an exercise in rote memorizing of dates and names and the famous political deeds of kings, queens, emperors, and generals.

The ancient Greeks, especially during and after Herodotus, considered the study of history to be a form of moral instruction.

Modern university level historical instruction by talented professors makes history more of a humanistic story and imbued with the rich tapestry of political history, cultural history, economic history, history of science, and intellectual history.
 
Hello Cypress,

Somewhere along the way, high school history instruction became an exercise in rote memorizing of dates and names and the famous political deeds of kings, queens, emperors, and generals.

The ancient Greeks, especially during and after Herodotus, considered the study of history to be a form of moral instruction.

Modern university level historical instruction by talented professors makes history more of a humanistic story and imbued with the rich tapestry of political history, cultural history, economic history, history of science, and intellectual history.

A good teacher makes all the difference.

I had a physics professor that was awesome. It was like going to a show. He was so creative in his demonstrations!

Concurrently, my chemistry professor was terrible, the worst. Rattled on and on faster than I could comprehend, acted annoyed when asked a question, and worst of all, gave a test at the end of each class on what had been discussed that day. Then, at the next class after the test, that was when he would go over the material and show how each problem was worked. First you get tested on it, then you are shown how to work the problems!

Naturally, I learned way more physics than chemistry.

Later, I found out chemistry was a weeder course for pre-med. The trick was: you had to be part of a study group and put in extra time before each lecture to 'advance-learn' the material on your own time. The pre-med students were usually part of a fraternity that was 'on the inside,' and had advance group knowledge of what was faced, set up their own 'classes' on how to take the weeder course.

Silly me. I thought you go to class to learn, receive an assignment, do the work, learn how to work the problems, get taught, and THEN get tested on it.

Oh, you definitely wanted to learn the material after your tests, regardless of how well you did. You'd see it again on the final. But the tests were part of your grade, so knowing it by the end of the course did not get you a good grade.

Schools should be set up to first teach, then test. That's what people are paying for and expecting.

That stuff was hard enough with making it even more difficult to learn.
 
Hello Cypress,



A good teacher makes all the difference.

I had a physics professor that was awesome. It was like going to a show. He was so creative in his demonstrations!

Concurrently, my chemistry professor was terrible, the worst. Rattled on and on faster than I could comprehend, acted annoyed when asked a question, and worst of all, gave a test at the end of each class on what had been discussed that day. Then, at the next class after the test, that was when he would go over the material and show how each problem was worked. First you get tested on it, then you are shown how to work the problems!

Naturally, I learned way more physics than chemistry.

Later, I found out chemistry was a weeder course for pre-med. The trick was: you had to be part of a study group and put in extra time before each lecture to 'advance-learn' the material on your own time. The pre-med students were usually part of a fraternity that was 'on the inside,' and had advance group knowledge of what was faced, set up their own 'classes' on how to take the weeder course.

Silly me. I thought you go to class to learn, receive an assignment, do the work, learn how to work the problems, get taught, and THEN get tested on it.

Oh, you definitely wanted to learn the material after your tests, regardless of how well you did. You'd see it again on the final. But the tests were part of your grade, so knowing it by the end of the course did not get you a good grade.

Schools should be set up to first teach, then test. That's what people are paying for and expecting.

That stuff was hard enough with making it even more difficult to learn.

The problem I found with those lower undergraduate chemistry and physics courses is there were 200 people to a class. The learning experience really should be limited to 25 people or less.

Life has taught me that the questions are just as important as the answers. Maybe more so. If kids cannot answer the questions a professor poses, maybe the problem is not that the students are ignorant. Maybe the problem is the professor needs to do a better job framing the questions.
 
Hello ThatOwlWoman,



I remember how boring I found history back in school. And it was scheduled after lunch for me, when the human body would naturally prefer a nap. That was truly a challenge to fight my instinctive biorhythms and stay awake.

That's why I like the podcasts! It's like I'm back in history class, except now I don't get called out for falling asleep. I like to put them on when I go to bed. I have the computer set to auto-shut-off. I rarely hear the end of a podcast! It's GREAT. I learn a little, take my mind off everything from the day, and conk out.

Then, the next night, I put the same episode on and advance it as far as I can remember from the previous night, start from there, and let it keep going. It's PERFECT!

That's kind of like those "Learn a foreign language while you sleep!" tapes they used to sell, remember those? That's a cool way to enjoy the podcasts. What you said about your post-lunch class is pretty much what happens when I try to listen to the podcasts -- zzzzz. lol What are you listening to right now?
 
Back
Top