Benghazi Attack: US Investigates 9/11 Theory

I have no doubt that it is related to 9/11 and not some loony video.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/benghazi-attack-us-investigates-9-11-theory-023951522.html

It's related to the US being in bed with Al Queda.

This flies over the courthouse in Benghazi

article-2055630-0E9C4B0C00000578-536_468x347.jpg


Flying proudly over the birthplace of Libya's revolution, the flag of Al Qaeda
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-revolution-flag-Al-Qaeda.html#ixzz26MYz8QYb
 
It's related to the US being in bed with Al Queda.

This flies over the courthouse in Benghazi

article-2055630-0E9C4B0C00000578-536_468x347.jpg


Flying proudly over the birthplace of Libya's revolution, the flag of Al Qaeda
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-revolution-flag-Al-Qaeda.html#ixzz26MYz8QYb
That link is dated TODAY -and looky here:
Flag_of_Libya.jpg


The black flag of Al Qaeda was hoisted in Libya yesterday as Nato formally ended its military campaign.
The standard fluttered from the roof of the courthouse in Benghazi, where the country’s new rulers have imposed sharia law since seizing power.
Seen as the seat of the revolution, the judicial building was used by rebel forces to establish their provisional government and media centre
"Rebel forces" my arse. why not the new flag of Libya?

Because the NTC IS AQ, their leadership, Now the fucking AQ flag is at the "seat of the 'revolution"

Another fine job, Mr. POTUS
 
if your gonna call "BS", you might want to say why.

I'm looking over your post .. where's the bullshit.

Maybe it's "Because the NTC IS AQ, their leadership"

Is that true?


Al-Qaeda and the Libyan Rebellion -- excepts


A new report from two French think tanks concludes that jihadists have played a predominant role in the eastern-Libyan rebellion against the rule of Moammar Qaddafi, and that “true democrats” represent only a minority in the rebellion. The report, furthermore, calls into question the justifications given for Western military intervention in Libya, arguing that they are largely based on media exaggerations and “outright disinformation.”

---

The report describes members of the al-Qaeda-affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group as the “main pillar of the armed insurrection.” “Thus the military coalition under NATO leadership is supporting a rebellion that includes Islamic terrorists,” the authors write. Alluding to the major role played by the Cyrenaica region in supplying recruits for al-Qaeda in Iraq, they add, “No one can deny that the Libyan rebels who are today supported by Washington were only yesterday jihadists killing American GIs in Iraq.”

The full composition of the NTC has not been made public. But, according to the authors, one avowed al-Qaeda recruiter, Abdul-Hakim al-Hasadi, is himself a member of the NTC. (On al-Hasadi, see my March 25 report here.) Al-Hasadi is described by the authors as the “leader of the Libyan rebels.” Although Western media reports commonly say that he is in charge of the defense of his home town of Darnah in eastern Libya, the CIRET-CF2R report suggests that in mid-April, al-Hasadi left Cyrenaica by boat in order to participate in the battle of Misrata. He is supposed to have taken arms and 25 “well-trained fighters” with him. Misrata is in western Libya, a mere 135 miles from Tripoli

Regarding the effects of western military intervention in support of the rebels, the authors conclude:

Western intervention is in the process of creating more problems than it resolves. It is one thing to force Qaddafi to leave. It is another thing to spread chaos and destruction in Libya to this end and to prepare the ground for fundamentalist Islam. The current moves risk destabilizing all of North Africa, the Sahel, and the Middle East and favoring the emergence of a new regional base for radical Islam and terrorism.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/270293/al-qaeda-and-libyan-rebellion-john-rosenthal#


Profile: Libyan rebel commander Abdel Hakim Belhadj

Abdel Hakim Belhadj is a rising star in the Libyan leadership and standing for election, but his past ties to jihadi groups have sparked controversy - along with his claims of being tortured at the behest of US and British intelligence agencies under the programme known as rendition.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14786753

What you said is quite obviously absolutely correct.
 
I'm looking over your post .. where's the bullshit.

Maybe it's "Because the NTC IS AQ, their leadership"

Is that true?

Al-Qaeda and the Libyan Rebellion -- excepts


A new report from two French think tanks concludes that jihadists have played a predominant role in the eastern-Libyan rebellion against the rule of Moammar Qaddafi, and that “true democrats” represent only a minority in the rebellion. The report, furthermore, calls into question the justifications given for Western military intervention in Libya, arguing that they are largely based on media exaggerations and “outright disinformation.”

---

The report describes members of the al-Qaeda-affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group as the “main pillar of the armed insurrection.” “Thus the military coalition under NATO leadership is supporting a rebellion that includes Islamic terrorists,” the authors write. Alluding to the major role played by the Cyrenaica region in supplying recruits for al-Qaeda in Iraq, they add, “No one can deny that the Libyan rebels who are today supported by Washington were only yesterday jihadists killing American GIs in Iraq.”

The full composition of the NTC has not been made public. But, according to the authors, one avowed al-Qaeda recruiter, Abdul-Hakim al-Hasadi, is himself a member of the NTC. (On al-Hasadi, see my March 25 report here.) Al-Hasadi is described by the authors as the “leader of the Libyan rebels.” Although Western media reports commonly say that he is in charge of the defense of his home town of Darnah in eastern Libya, the CIRET-CF2R report suggests that in mid-April, al-Hasadi left Cyrenaica by boat in order to participate in the battle of Misrata. He is supposed to have taken arms and 25 “well-trained fighters” with him. Misrata is in western Libya, a mere 135 miles from Tripoli

Regarding the effects of western military intervention in support of the rebels, the authors conclude:

Western intervention is in the process of creating more problems than it resolves. It is one thing to force Qaddafi to leave. It is another thing to spread chaos and destruction in Libya to this end and to prepare the ground for fundamentalist Islam. The current moves risk destabilizing all of North Africa, the Sahel, and the Middle East and favoring the emergence of a new regional base for radical Islam and terrorism.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/270293/al-qaeda-and-libyan-rebellion-john-rosenthal#


Profile: Libyan rebel commander Abdel Hakim Belhadj

Abdel Hakim Belhadj is a rising star in the Libyan leadership and standing for election, but his past ties to jihadi groups have sparked controversy - along with his claims of being tortured at the behest of US and British intelligence agencies under the programme known as rendition.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14786753

What you said is quite obviously absolutely correct.
Western intervention is in the process of creating more problems than it resolves. It is one thing to force Qaddafi to leave. It is another thing to spread chaos and destruction in Libya to this end and to prepare the ground for fundamentalist Islam. The current moves risk destabilizing all of North Africa, the Sahel, and the Middle East and favoring the emergence of a new regional base for radical Islam and terrorism.[/i]
Yep. without going into cross board talk, it's EXACTLY like we called it, a "no fly zone" becomes "Gaddafi must go" to the final US hit on the convoy.
NATO "Humanely bombing" Misrata( after repeates denials of civilain casualties).....
I'm not gonna go over it all again -if anyone paid the slightest bit of attention, the Pick Up Truck guys ( NTC initial ordinance was just that), had to be bombed every inch of the way to Sirte, they NEVER got popular support.

Maybe the Libyans didn't want Gaddafi removed/executed. But Obama ( with a few NATO sock puppets) was determined to make this ,,,what part of his "creds" on national security?

Everthing he touches turn to shit, in terms of wars. Libya, the escalation of AfPak, and even his war on medical marijuana.
He's a freaking neo-con - Romney is a puppet of the Neo -Cons. They both ain't worth jack shit.

I could go on about getting invloved in yet another foreign civil war in Yemen. What's the point? Americans DO NOT WANT TO CONFRONT REALITY.
The reality, as we're seeing is we are the Monsters of the world, i don't hold us on any higher plane then even AQ. we're both "terrorist organizatons"
 
Yep. without going into cross board talk, it's EXACTLY like we called it, a "no fly zone" becomes "Gaddafi must go" to the final US hit on the convoy.
NATO "Humanely bombing" Misrata( after repeates denials of civilain casualties).....
I'm not gonna go over it all again -if anyone paid the slightest bit of attention, the Pick Up Truck guys ( NYC initial ordinance was just that), had to be bombed every inch of the way to Sirte, they NEVER got popular support.

Maybe the Libyans didn't want Gaddafi removed/executed. But Obama ( with a few NATO sock puppets) was determined to make this ,,,what part of his "creds" on national security?

Everthingn he touches turn to shit, in terms of wars. Libya, the escalation of AfPak, and even his war on medical marijuana.
He's a freaking neo-con - Romney is a puppet of the Neo -Cons. They boyh ain't worth jack shit.

I could go on about getting invloved in yet another foreign civil war in Yemen. What's the point? Americans DO NOT WANT TO CONFRONT REALITY.
The reality, as we're seeing is we are the Monsters of the world, i don't hold us on any higher plane then even AQ. we're both "terrorist organizatons"

TOO much truth for the American mind.
 
Back
Top