Biden's Budget Blunder

TTQ64

Verified User
Biden tried it.

He will revisit this again when working across the aisle with republicans. A leopard doesn't change it's spots. Joe Biden Admits He Was Willing To Cut Social Security As Part Of Budget Talks. ......President Obama shut this shit down with joe and the republicans.


Former Vice President Joe Biden admitted on Sunday night that “everything was on the table,” including Social Security cuts, during bipartisan budget talks in which he participated. In a one-on-one Democratic presidential debate in Washington, Biden accused Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) of airing TV ads that inaccurately claimed Biden had supported cuts to Social Security benefits. It sparked a prolonged exchange between the two in which Sanders pointed to times that Biden had either voted for or voiced support for cuts to the program.

“You were in the Senate for a few years, time and time again, talking about the necessity ― with pride ― about cutting Social Security, cutting Medicare, cutting veterans programs,” Sanders said. Biden inaccurately argued that he had never cast votes for legislation that would have cut Social Security. But he also conceded that “everything was on the table” during deficit-reduction talks he had taken part in, an apparent reference to negotiations with Congress when he was second-in-command in the Obama administration.

“What is true is in terms of the negotiations that were taking place, how to deal with the deficit, everything was on the table,” Biden said. “I did not support any of those cuts in Social Security or in veterans [benefits].” Sanders, sensing a vulnerable moment, interjected.

“Whoa, whoa, whoa ― ‘everything was on the table’: All right, you’re right, you just said it ― including cuts to Social Security and veterans,” Sanders said.


Those talks fell apart, but they stand as a testament to Biden’s prominent role in the Obama administration’s ultimately unsuccessful, multi-year quest to strike a fiscal “grand bargain” with Republicans.

In particular, then-President Barack Obama, with Biden at his side, dangled the prospect of a more modest cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security, veterans benefits and other programs in exchange for potential new revenue and cooperation on other items. The resistance of ultra-conservative Republicans helped spike those talks, but Sanders is correct in noting that progressive protests he helped lead generated pressure from the left as well.



https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-...esidential-primary_n_5e6ee248c5b6bd8156fa249e
 
Southern Negros have chosen Biden.
So ... Biden or Trump? What's it going to be.



Biden tried it.

He will revisit this again when working across the aisle with republicans. A leopard doesn't change it's spots. Joe Biden Admits He Was Willing To Cut Social Security As Part Of Budget Talks. ......President Obama shut this shit down with joe and the republicans.


Former Vice President Joe Biden admitted on Sunday night that “everything was on the table,” including Social Security cuts, during bipartisan budget talks in which he participated. In a one-on-one Democratic presidential debate in Washington, Biden accused Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) of airing TV ads that inaccurately claimed Biden had supported cuts to Social Security benefits. It sparked a prolonged exchange between the two in which Sanders pointed to times that Biden had either voted for or voiced support for cuts to the program.

“You were in the Senate for a few years, time and time again, talking about the necessity ― with pride ― about cutting Social Security, cutting Medicare, cutting veterans programs,” Sanders said. Biden inaccurately argued that he had never cast votes for legislation that would have cut Social Security. But he also conceded that “everything was on the table” during deficit-reduction talks he had taken part in, an apparent reference to negotiations with Congress when he was second-in-command in the Obama administration.

“What is true is in terms of the negotiations that were taking place, how to deal with the deficit, everything was on the table,” Biden said. “I did not support any of those cuts in Social Security or in veterans [benefits].” Sanders, sensing a vulnerable moment, interjected.

“Whoa, whoa, whoa ― ‘everything was on the table’: All right, you’re right, you just said it ― including cuts to Social Security and veterans,” Sanders said.


Those talks fell apart, but they stand as a testament to Biden’s prominent role in the Obama administration’s ultimately unsuccessful, multi-year quest to strike a fiscal “grand bargain” with Republicans.

In particular, then-President Barack Obama, with Biden at his side, dangled the prospect of a more modest cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security, veterans benefits and other programs in exchange for potential new revenue and cooperation on other items. The resistance of ultra-conservative Republicans helped spike those talks, but Sanders is correct in noting that progressive protests he helped lead generated pressure from the left as well.



https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-...esidential-primary_n_5e6ee248c5b6bd8156fa249e
 
Biden tried it.

He will revisit this again when working across the aisle with republicans. A leopard doesn't change it's spots. Joe Biden Admits He Was Willing To Cut Social Security As Part Of Budget Talks. ......President Obama shut this shit down with joe and the republicans.


Former Vice President Joe Biden admitted on Sunday night that “everything was on the table,” including Social Security cuts, during bipartisan budget talks in which he participated. In a one-on-one Democratic presidential debate in Washington, Biden accused Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) of airing TV ads that inaccurately claimed Biden had supported cuts to Social Security benefits. It sparked a prolonged exchange between the two in which Sanders pointed to times that Biden had either voted for or voiced support for cuts to the program.

“You were in the Senate for a few years, time and time again, talking about the necessity ― with pride ― about cutting Social Security, cutting Medicare, cutting veterans programs,” Sanders said. Biden inaccurately argued that he had never cast votes for legislation that would have cut Social Security. But he also conceded that “everything was on the table” during deficit-reduction talks he had taken part in, an apparent reference to negotiations with Congress when he was second-in-command in the Obama administration.

“What is true is in terms of the negotiations that were taking place, how to deal with the deficit, everything was on the table,” Biden said. “I did not support any of those cuts in Social Security or in veterans [benefits].” Sanders, sensing a vulnerable moment, interjected.

“Whoa, whoa, whoa ― ‘everything was on the table’: All right, you’re right, you just said it ― including cuts to Social Security and veterans,” Sanders said.


Those talks fell apart, but they stand as a testament to Biden’s prominent role in the Obama administration’s ultimately unsuccessful, multi-year quest to strike a fiscal “grand bargain” with Republicans.

In particular, then-President Barack Obama, with Biden at his side, dangled the prospect of a more modest cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security, veterans benefits and other programs in exchange for potential new revenue and cooperation on other items. The resistance of ultra-conservative Republicans helped spike those talks, but Sanders is correct in noting that progressive protests he helped lead generated pressure from the left as well.



https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-...esidential-primary_n_5e6ee248c5b6bd8156fa249e

There are times that the better of the two is not that great, but are you suggesting that you prefer Trump????????????????
 
There are times that the better of the two is not that great, but are you suggesting that you prefer Trump????????????????

trump is trying to keep jobs from hemorrhaging due to bad trade deals.

what's one thing biden will do for working people?
 
The fact is Biden was convinced that the debt had to be dealt with and he was willing to cut across the board. The implication is that SS and Medicaid were singled out is false. Reagan, Bush, and Trump proved the debt does not matter. At least rightys believe it.
 
The fact is Biden was convinced that the debt had to be dealt with and he was willing to cut across the board. The implication is that SS and Medicaid were singled out is false. Reagan, Bush, and Trump proved the debt does not matter. At least rightys believe it.

but we're trumpanzees.
 
trump is trying to keep jobs from hemorrhaging due to bad trade deals.

what's one thing biden will do for working people?

Obama created 16 million jobs from the depth of Bush's near depression until his 2nd term ended. How the fuck is that hemorrhaging jobs. https://www.thebalance.com/job-creation-by-president-by-number-and-percent-3863218 Rightys must sometimes have to feel very stupid when they see how untrue what they believe is. You should be especially vulnerable to abject embarrassment.
 
Obama created 16 million jobs from the depth of Bush's near depression until his 2nd term ended. How the fuck is that hemorrhaging jobs. https://www.thebalance.com/job-creation-by-president-by-number-and-percent-3863218 Rightys must sometimes have to feel very stupid when they see how untrue what they believe is. You should be especially vulnerable to abject embarrassment.

Look at the supposed righty's ITT. You a corporate Dem Nordberg?



U.S.-China trade has cost 2.3 million U.S. jobs: report

""You think this was an accident, or somehow all unintentional?

This was exactly what the wall street republicans, and corporate-sponsored Dems had in mind when the passed NAFTA, WTO, and China MFN.

A downward pressure on labor costs and wages in the United States.

People like Cawacko, Damocles, and Stuperfreak actually bought into the nonsense that William F Buckley, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and Alan Greenspan were actually valiantly trying to improve the status, power, and wage potential of america's working middle class. Is it possible to be any more foolish that to believe scions of the conservative movement and america's rich investor were invested in improving the power and status of Joe and Jane working class american?""


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...t-2-3-million-U-S-jobs-report&highlight=china
 
Look at the supposed righty's ITT. You a corporate Dem Nordberg?



U.S.-China trade has cost 2.3 million U.S. jobs: report

""You think this was an accident, or somehow all unintentional?

This was exactly what the wall street republicans, and corporate-sponsored Dems had in mind when the passed NAFTA, WTO, and China MFN.

A downward pressure on labor costs and wages in the United States.

People like Cawacko, Damocles, and Stuperfreak actually bought into the nonsense that William F Buckley, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and Alan Greenspan were actually valiantly trying to improve the status, power, and wage potential of america's working middle class. Is it possible to be any more foolish that to believe scions of the conservative movement and america's rich investor were invested in improving the power and status of Joe and Jane working class american?""


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...t-2-3-million-U-S-jobs-report&highlight=china

we know you're a globalist dimwit. be more ashamed.
 
we know you're a globalist dimwit. be more ashamed.

I’m a free trader and proud of it. This 2007 thread shows you’ve been consistent in your position for a long time and Nordberg doesn’t know what he’s talking about if he thinks only people on the right complain about trade deals, the average working man and job loss.
 
I’m a free trader and proud of it. This 2007 thread shows you’ve been consistent in your position for a long time and Nordberg doesn’t know what he’s talking about if he thinks only people on the right complain about trade deals, the average working man and job loss.

did allowing china into the wto make china improve their human rights situation? or did it cause massive jobs transfers from relatively free societies to Sino-slaves?
 
sorry man if im not tracking right this morning. you know china just makes me crazy. you defending my consistency is good. thanks.
 
Look at the supposed righty's ITT. You a corporate Dem Nordberg?



U.S.-China trade has cost 2.3 million U.S. jobs: report

""You think this was an accident, or somehow all unintentional?

This was exactly what the wall street republicans, and corporate-sponsored Dems had in mind when the passed NAFTA, WTO, and China MFN.

A downward pressure on labor costs and wages in the United States.

People like Cawacko, Damocles, and Stuperfreak actually bought into the nonsense that William F Buckley, Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and Alan Greenspan were actually valiantly trying to improve the status, power, and wage potential of america's working middle class. Is it possible to be any more foolish that to believe scions of the conservative movement and america's rich investor were invested in improving the power and status of Joe and Jane working class american?""


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...t-2-3-million-U-S-jobs-report&highlight=china

Our trade balance with all the great trade deals, the best trade deals ever, has gone up 25 percent. Trump lies and rightys buy.
 
Our trade balance with all the great trade deals, the best trade deals ever, has gone up 25 percent. Trump lies and rightys buy.

I have no idea what you just said.

The thread above was started by a liberal in 2007 about the U.S. jobs getting crushed by trade with China and the quote I copied was by a liberal calling out free traders such as myself.

Do you actually have a position? (novel concept i know)
 
If that means you post without knowledge and use Breitbart and Fox talking points, then your name is fitting.

I knew a some point that "Headup tRumpsasszombie" would get something right. I just wonder if he actually throws his feces on bathroom walls.
 
Was interesting reading that thread.. Funny how some things change, & others remain pretty much the same..

I do think back then Dems, in general had a better grasp of what those "free traders" were up to & their options to stop them.......

TO bad there wasn't enough of them hearing that sucking sound coming in their future......

They said there would be winners & losers but the details were a bit fuzzy.. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top