Bill Clinton: John McCain and Hillary are 'very close'

Socrtease

Verified User
(CNN) — If Hillary Clinton and John McCain become their party's presidential nominees, the general election race is likely to be a love-fest.

At least according to Bill Clinton.

Campaigning in Spartanburg, South Carolina, Friday, the former president brushed aside suggestions his wife would prove to be a divisive nominee for the Democratic Party, pointing out how she has successfully worked with Republicans in the Senate — including one of the current GOP presidential candidates.

"She and John McCain are very close," Clinton said. "They always laugh that if they wound up being the nominees of their party, it would be the most civilized election in American history, and they're afraid they'd put the voters to sleep because they like and respect each other."

The comments may not be welcome by the McCain camp — which yesterday faced fire from several of its rivals for winning the backing of the New York Times — a longtime archenemy of conservatives.

Sens. McCain and Clinton last met publicly at an ABC debate earlier January, when presidential candidates of both parties shared the same stage. The two were seen exchanging pleasantries, and a Clinton side said she told the Arizona senator he’d done a “good job” staging a comeback in New Hampshire. He asked that she say hello to Bill Clinton for him.

– CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/25/bill-clinton-john-mccain-and-hillary-are-very-close/


Wonder if this means Johnny Mac will not play nasty politics with Hillary if they face one another?
 
usprimaries_2008.png


They are actually pretty close.

I'm actually starting to hope that McCain wins Florida. I couldn't stand it if that statist bastard Romney were the nominee.
 
Last edited:
Where do you get this BS?

Your such a advocate for communism it isn't funny.

Get aids.

First you are on here makng posts claiming you have the right to kill liberals. Now you are telling a teenager you hope he gets aids.

Have you considered that your rage is a bad indication for your own future health, and considered getting help for it?
 
You guys are so friggen litterial--you don't see a damn thing!!!

Cry me a friggen river because I don't like communists like homesexual watermark. I really don't have any control by "wishing" he gets aids, and I don't wish it. But if he gets it--it would serve any commie justice IMO.

Screw you guys---if you don't like an opinion different from what you think is your own. These friggen liberial commies are taking Americans freedom from them---I am pised about it, and I will express it anyway I want to.
 
Last edited:
You guys are so friggen litterial--you don't see a damn thing!!!

Cry me a friggen river because I don't like communists like homesexual watermark. I really don't have any control by "wishing" he gets aids, and I don't wish it. But if he gets it--it would serve any commie justice IMO.

Screw you guys---if you don't like an opinion different from what you think is your own. These friggen liberial commies are taking Americans freedom from them---I am pised about it, and I will express it anyway I want to.

So I guess the answer is, no, you haven't seen anybody about your rage?

Ok...well, eventually it will be court-ordered. We can wait.
 
You guys are so friggen litterial--you don't see a damn thing!!!

Not much to be seen.

Cry me a friggen river

:crybaby:

Done.

because I don't like communists

I don't think many of us like the communist philosophy.
homesexual watermark
.

That's not an insult, it's just innacurate.

I really don't have any control by "wishing" he gets aids, and I don't wish it. But if he gets it--it would serve any commie justice IMO.

I would hope that no one in your family gets AIDS Majority. It's hard to see people die. Hopefully no one will ever get it again. "Justice" (I.E. vengenance) isn't my style, especially for reasons so frivolous.

Screw you guys---

No.

if you don't like an opinion different from what you think is your own.

Is this coming from you? You are an irresponsible, rage prone jerk, since day one. You annoy the hell out of us here with your nonsensical rants and ridiculous insults thrown every which way. If anyone disagrees with anyone you said, they are suddenly a "librul cmomie!~" who wants to "take your freedom", even though your the person proposing restricting our freedom in most cases, and you don't make any sense.

These friggen liberial commies are taking Americans freedom from them---I am pised about it, and I will express it anyway I want to.

Please. YOu don't believe in freedom at all. Take protectionism, for instance. You want to take away my freedom to buy foreign goods, and you want to take away my freedom to hire people from other countries.
 

(CNN) — If Hillary Clinton and John McCain become their party's presidential nominees, the general election race is likely to be a love-fest.

At least according to Bill Clinton



For all his flaws, Bill Clinton is smart like a fox.

Do you see what's going on here? I suspect (and I could be wrong) that Clinton's motivation here, is to divide the republican base.

Imagine the republican base - which is predisposed to hate McCain anyway - thinking that John McCain is going to be "buddies" with hillary clinton??? Can you imagine what wingnuts might possibly think about that?
 

(CNN) — If Hillary Clinton and John McCain become their party's presidential nominees, the general election race is likely to be a love-fest.

At least according to Bill Clinton



For all his flaws, Bill Clinton is smart like a fox.

Do you see what's going on here? I suspect (and I could be wrong) that Clinton's motivation here, is to divide the republican base.

Imagine the republican base - which is predisposed to hate McCain anyway - thinking that John McCain is going to be "buddies" with hillary clinton??? Can you imagine what wingnuts might possibly think about that?

It would be good to wait on doing that until the nomination is over, so that he doesn't kill McCain's chances and put a statist bastard like Romney dangerously close to the whitehouse.
 
It would be good to wait on doing that until the nomination is over, so that he doesn't kill McCain's chances and put a statist bastard like Romney dangerously close to the whitehouse.


I'd rather have Romney, than McCain. Not that I want either.
 
Why? McCain is a much better man than Romney.


He's old, senile, he'll bomb iran, he's a neoconservative, he want to stay in iraq for a thousand years, and he'll continue the assault on a woman's right to choose.


I think Romney's just lying about being a "conservative" to get elected. I think he's your garden variety, country club northeastern moderate republican.
 
He's old, senile, he'll bomb iran, he's a neoconservative, he want to stay in iraq for a thousand years, and he'll continue the assault on a woman's right to choose.

He's no more of a warmonger than Hillary.

I think Romney's just lying about being a "conservative" to get elected. I think he's your garden variety, country club northeastern moderate republican.

I think he's the real deal, and his pitch at being a moderate in Massachusettes was the lie. Either way, I'm not giving him the oppurtunity.
 
So I guess the answer is, no, you haven't seen anybody about your rage?

Ok...well, eventually it will be court-ordered. We can wait.


LOL---my rage is placed to well--and you are not sharp enough to hurt my expression. It is a expression---liberial.

I am expressing how much you stinking liberials piss me off. you folks seem too thick to accept the words "please--don't mess up our lives anymore"

Please does not work with you radical liberials. Your insane to think a person who wants to be free will accept your philosophies of socialism. I am not insane for wanting to be free--as you libs constantly try to convience us of. All I have to say to you is----it is not going to be easy for you commies if I have anything to say about it.

You libs are making me put up my fists--because you threaten me---I don't threaten you. I have the conviction to fight for what I think is right for myself, and what individuals think is right for them who agree.
 
Last edited:
LOL---my rage is placed to well--and you are not sharp enough to hurt my expression. It is a expression---liberial.

I am expressing how much you stinking liberials piss me off. you folks seem too thick to accept the words "please--don't mess up our lives anymore"

Please does not work with you radical liberials. Your insane to think a person who wants to be free will accept your philosophies of socialism. I am not insane for wanting to be free--as you libs constantly try to convience us of. All I have to say to you is----it is not going to be easy for you commies if I have anything to say about it.

You libs are making me put up my fists--because you threaten me---I don't threaten you. I have the conviction to fight for what I think is right for myself, and what individuals think is right for them who agree.

"Freedom" is a word so overused as to be meaningless.
 
"Freedom" is a word so overused as to be meaningless.

I agree---it needs to be defined well, and authenticly again. If you were a socialist (and you are)---would the people not remembering freedom be to your advantage to push a socialistic agenda?

What were you taught aboput freedom? Anything at all? Think back--nothing. They don't teach like they used to when I was in HS. I bet the line you just told me is all you ever learned about freedom.
 
"Freedom" is a word so overused as to be meaningless.

I agree---it needs to be defined well, and authenticly again. If you were a socialist (and you are)---would the people not remembering freedom be to your advantage to push a socialistic agenda?

What were you taught aboput freedom? Anything at all? Think back--nothing. They don't teach like they used to when I was in HS. I bet the line you just told me is all you ever learned about freedom. I can tell.
 
I agree---it needs to be defined well, and authenticly again. If you were a socialist (and you are)---would the people not remembering freedom be to your advantage to push a socialistic agenda?

What were you taught aboput freedom? Anything at all? Think back--nothing. They don't teach like they used to when I was in HS. I bet the line you just told me is all you ever learned about freedom.

I arrived at that conclusion after hearing my teachers label all kinds of different contradictory things freedom.

Notice FDR's four freedoms for instance:

Freedom of speech
Freedom of religion
Freedom from want
Freedom from fear

Notice how he switches "of" to "from" - essentially, he's labeling what is an anti-freedom as a freedom. If it were really a freedom, you'd have the freedom to want, and the freedom to fear, but not necessarily a protection from the two.

Now - is that really all that great a thing anyway? Some freedoms aren't so great. The restriction on murdering other people is a restriction on freedom, but it's a perfectly reasonable restriction on freedom.
 
Back
Top