Breaking News!

I notice the Chinese haven't murdered Liu Xiaobo just because he embarrased them.

I wonder if the USA will refrain from killing Assange.

are you serious?

we could have taken him out anytime over the past half year

i find it interesting how you refer this country in the 3rd person....do you really live on the central coast?
 
are you serious?

we could have taken him out anytime over the past half year

i find it interesting how you refer this country in the 3rd person....do you really live on the central coast?


We?

Who is "we"?

So, you're privy to the assassination plans of the Obama admin?

Where I live is no concern of yours.
 
touchy, touchy....

i wonder why....;)

"If there had been a tiny bit of honesty in the official version of events, there might be some reason to consider the British and American government's claims that British and American troops are put at risk because people know the truth.

This does not put soldiers lives at risk. What it puts at risk is the reputation of lying politicians and bureaucrats who send soldiers to their deaths."

http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2010/10/julian_assange_2.html
 
"If there had been a tiny bit of honesty in the official version of events, there might be some reason to consider the British and American government's claims that British and American troops are put at risk because people know the truth.

This does not put soldiers lives at risk. What it puts at risk is the reputation of lying politicians and bureaucrats who send soldiers to their deaths."

http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2010/10/julian_assange_2.html

yeah....so an opinion piece really deals with my post....

why so touchy? why so concerned about where you live? ;)
 
"The most baffling thing about the Wikileaks Cablegate kerfuffle is the massive foot-shooting overreaction across the entire American political spectrum....Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, has called for Julian Assange’s prosecution, despite the general consensus that he hasn’t actually committed any American crime. Mitch McConnell, a Republican, has a slightly clearer-eyed view; he wants the law changed so that Assange can be prosecuted as a terrorist. Joe Lieberman wants a criminal investigation of not just Assange but also the New York Times.

What exactly do they hope to accomplish? Do they think that if they do somehow manage to convict Assange—who, remember, was only the publisher, not the leaker—they will have eliminated the threat of Internet information dissemination forever? Don’t they realize that with every boneheaded speech and op-ed, they ratchet up the free publicity and do Wikileaks a huge favor, when a dignified silence plus a few veiled threats would have been far more effective? Can they really be so stupid?

Well, yes."




http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/11/america-furious-wikileaks/
 
Back
Top