Breaking Presidential News

charver

You lookin' at my pint?
Have you heard the news?

Brace yourselves ladies and gents.

Are you braced?

Perhaps you'd like to take a seat?

Comfortable?

Then i shall convey to you the new news which has broken Today.

Ready?

Here we go then.

This is it.

Oh yes.

What was i saying again?

Ah, that's right, the news.

Have you heard it?

Eh?

Eh?

The news is.

SAINT AL GORES IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT

Really, it is true. Look - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7048370.stm

Commiserations/Congratulations* all round. I feel your pain/delight* (*delete as applicable)
 
Have you heard the news?

Brace yourselves ladies and gents.

Are you braced?

Perhaps you'd like to take a seat?

Comfortable?

Then i shall convey to you the new news which has broken Today.

Ready?

Here we go then.

This is it.

Oh yes.

What was i saying again?

Ah, that's right, the news.

Have you heard it?

Eh?

Eh?

The news is.

SAINT AL GORES IS NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT

Really, it is true. Look - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7048370.stm

Commiserations/Congratulations* all round. I feel your pain/delight* (*delete as applicable)

You know, he's not a saint Charver, but I believe he would have been a damned sight better than Hillary Clinton, who is probably who we are going to end up with. That is if enough voters don't chicken out on voting for a women, in which case we'll get Rudy, in which case...human life continues to mean absolutely nothing. So that will be good.
 
You know, he's not a saint Charver, but I believe he would have been a damned sight better than Hillary Clinton, who is probably who we are going to end up with. That is if enough voters don't chicken out on voting for a women, in which case we'll get Rudy, in which case...human life continues to mean absolutely nothing. So that will be good.

Hillary or Rudy, eh? Tough choice. For one nation under God it seems that God really doesn't like you too much. Or lost a bet.

If you want i'll give you our glorious leader for nothing.
 
Hillary or Rudy, eh? Tough choice. For one nation under God it seems that God really doesn't like you too much. Or lost a bet.

If you want i'll give you our glorious leader for nothing.

I don't know much about him yet, but thanks for offering. I'll get back to you on it.

It really does seem as if God doesn't like us much.
 
You know, he's not a saint Charver, but I believe he would have been a damned sight better than Hillary Clinton, who is probably who we are going to end up with. That is if enough voters don't chicken out on voting for a women, in which case we'll get Rudy, in which case...human life continues to mean absolutely nothing. So that will be good.

You know, it is extremely sexist of you to insinuate that people won't vote for her because she is a woman or that they would vote against her simply for that reason. While I am sure there are a few examples out there that would do that, it is a very tiny minority of voters. There are plenty of reasons not to vote for Hillary.
 
And there is one big reason to vote for Hillary. She has the best shot of beating a Republican opponent.
The reasons not to vote for her pale in comparison to that one reason to vote for her.
I will admit it, I am a one issue voter this time, I will vote for anyone who can beat the Republican.
 
I belive Senator Clinton, Edwards or Obama could beat the Republican... Edwards, in my opinion, has the best chance!
 
You know, it is extremely sexist of you to insinuate that people won't vote for her because she is a woman or that they would vote against her simply for that reason. While I am sure there are a few examples out there that would do that, it is a very tiny minority of voters. There are plenty of reasons not to vote for Hillary.

This is a pretty old right wing trick SF. It's "playing the race card" to point out racism. It's "class warfare" to acknowlege class. It's "sexist" to understand that, sexism and sexists, exist.

You can do better.

At least come up with some original material...no?
 
No AL?

Ok there is still one guy who was actually elelcted by the American people.

Edwards was elelcted as a vice president by the people if you could remove the past vote fraud.


Rudy would be like just having Bush stay except hes even harder to look at.
 
You know, it is extremely sexist of you to insinuate that people won't vote for her because she is a woman or that they would vote against her simply for that reason. While I am sure there are a few examples out there that would do that, it is a very tiny minority of voters. There are plenty of reasons not to vote for Hillary.


SF, I truly believe that you think Hillary Clinton is a far left liberal simply because she's a woman. Because the rightwing always hated her, because she didn't fit the stereotype of the cookie-baking First Lady...she was a strong, professional woman with strong opinions.

Your assumptions about her being some crazy lefty are belied by her very moderate voting record. Yet you assume she's a crazy lefty who is hiding her true agenda.
 
This is a pretty old right wing trick SF. It's "playing the race card" to point out racism. It's "class warfare" to acknowlege class. It's "sexist" to understand that, sexism and sexists, exist.

You can do better.

At least come up with some original material...no?

Right... you come out with the early excuse for the possibility of her losing... to blame it on people being afraid of voting for a woman. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with Hitlary on an individual basis. No way. Not a chance, it has to be because she is a woman. Please.

and people won't ever vote for Obama... because he is black. Whatever. If Condi Rice were running, you wouldn't say a word if people were to tell you that they wouldn't vote for her. THEN it would be about Condi as an individual.... it wouldn't have a thing to do with her being black or female.
 
Back
Top