Bush' STAY HOME on 9/11 no need for you to go to any observations.

robdastud

robdastud

Junior Member
most americans blame you for it...


i mean if i thought someone was responsible for killing my family member i wouldn't want them to show their face around me


Asked whether they blame the Bush administration for the attacks, 45 percent said either a "great deal" or a "moderate amount," up from 32 percent in a June 2002 CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/09/11/911.poll/index.html
 
BTW - According to the most recent reports more than half do not believe that Bush was responsible...

Personally I think that there was 19 hijackers and some planners resonsible... But what do I know? I figure that the person who did the deed is usually responsible.
 
I am genuinely suprised that very many at all believe Bush was responsible.
If I call dixie a twerp and he bezerks out and kills someone because I called him a twerp, am I responsible for the death ?
 
BTW, I think this is a classic example of why we can't believe the polls. No one in their right mind blames Bush for 9/11. If ANY President is responsible, it is Clinton, and I don't even hold him completely responsible. This poll was obviously conducted by liberals with an agenda, like most of the bogus polls are, and it's designed to make idiots think like the rest of the liberal idiots, and nothing more.
 
Care4all said:
hmmmmm....you don't know that and can NOT say that....Timothy Mcveigh was not Islamic was he? but he was still a fanatic....and he used a bomb to terrorize us.
Click to expand...
Sure I can, at least with respect to 9-11
 
Troglodyte27 said:
MoHAMmed is to blame - no Islam no fanatical bombers
Click to expand...

Surely you jest.

The world has plenty of fanatical Hindu and Christian bombers.

From anti-muslim Hindu extremists in India, to Irish and Basque separatist christians, to christian abortion clinic bombers.
 
Care4all said:
hmmmmm....you don't know that and can NOT say that....Timothy Mcveigh was not Islamic was he? but he was still a fanatic....and he used a bomb to terrorize us.
Click to expand...

Cypress said:
Surely you jest.

The world has plenty of fanatical Hindu and Christian bombers.

From anti-muslim Hindu extremists in India, to Irish and Basque separatist christians, to christian abortion clinic bombers.
Click to expand...

True enough, but I never heard of an IRA suicide bomber.
 
uscitizen said:
LOL, bring it on skull head ;)
Click to expand...

Well see, you are proving my point... If I were to actually hunt you down and put a bullet through your punk head, people would point to this thread and say.... Well, uscitizen DID say, "bring it on", I guess he got what he asked for! So, indeed, if you antagonized me to the point of killing you, it would be your own fault.
 
Dixie said:
Well see, you are proving my point... If I were to actually hunt you down and put a bullet through your punk head, people would point to this thread and say.... Well, uscitizen DID say, "bring it on", I guess he got what he asked for! So, indeed, if you antagonized me to the point of killing you, it would be your own fault.
Click to expand...

You are of course assuming that I would be the one with the bullet thru the head ;)
I suppose to be fatal an ass shot would be needed for you.
 
No people would still blow themselves up even without religion. All you have to do is brainwash someone into any ideaology and they can do such things. You can convince people that you are such an important person or that your ideology is so great that people will die for it.

Religion is just an effect of something that is inherent in man. Religion is but a vehicle for its expression remove it and you find zealoutry elsewhere. Look at Communist societies that have outlawed religion are there societies any more just, stable or non-violent? No.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top