Can we dispense with the nonsense that women can do anything men can do already?

archives said:
Who spends time thinking women can do everything a man can do? Better yet, who spends thinking other people think women can do everything a man can do? Did you think someone was going to jump in and argue women can absolutely do everything a man can do?
Click to expand...
incompetent dumb bitches.
SmarterthanYou said:
I do know what is in those classes because I have a niece who takes those classes and regularly tries to debate me on what she's learned.
Click to expand...
fun times!
 
SmarterthanYou said:
how so? be specific
Click to expand...
Lying about women in posts like this:
Teflon Don said:
the modern day feminist movement has tricked everyone into believing that on the whole, women are equally physically as capable as men. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Click to expand...
Where is the proof that anyone, much less "the modern feminist movement" has tricked anyone?


Note the extreme hatred of women in this post. It's common among JPP MAGAts and indicates to me that they are alone, angry and not in a loving relationship with a woman:
ULTRA MAGA said:
Why is he married to that feminazi lib cunt in the first place? He gets what he deserved for being a simp.
Click to expand...
 
QP! said:
No stupid. What determines success is PARTICIPATION RATE.

Canadians do not have hockey gene, we have high participation rate which means more reach the top levels.

Women have been participating in chess and math olympics and poke a LOT less time and in less numbers for various reasons and thus you see less representation at the upper levels.

You increase the participation rate, whether it is hockey or math Olympiad and suddenly you see more top performers.

if you think it a conspiracy as to why that is because you are stupid. It is all participation rate.

See Cuba, Japan, Dominican Republic for baseball as just another example of why it is entirely participation rate
Click to expand...
no..

wrong.


  1. Wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Variability_hypothesis

    Variability hypothesis - Wikipedia​

    The variability hypothesis, also known as the greater male variability hypothesis, is the hypothesis that human males generally display greater variability in traits than human females do.
  2. heterodoxacademy.org

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    Heterodox Academy

    https://heterodoxacademy.org › blog › the-greater-male-variability-hypothesis

    The Greater Male Variability Hypothesis - Heterodox Academy​

    We explore the Greater Male Variability Hypothesis - the idea that men vary more than women on a variety of abilities, interests, & traits.
  3. reddit.com

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    Reddit

    https://www.reddit.com › r › AskFeminists › comments › 16g97j6 › is_it_true_that_men_tend_to_vary_more_than_women

    Is it true that men tend to vary more than women? - Reddit​

    When talking about the greater male variability hypothesis, it's important to distinguish between discussions of whether the hypothesis is true (which is pretty much confirmed) or whether this variability is responsible for the difference in outcomes between men and women (evidence is mixed).
  4. sciencedirect.com

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    ScienceDirect

    https://www.sciencedirect.com › science › article › pii › S0191886921000362

    Gender differences in creativity: Examining the greater male ...​

    The Greater Male Variability Hypothesis (GMVH) suggests that males demonstrate greater variability than females and are overrepresented in the lowest and highest ranges of cognitive ability.
  5. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    Only include results for this siteHide site from these results

    Share feedback about this site

    pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
 

Variability hypothesis​



The variability hypothesis, also known as the greater male variability hypothesis, is the hypothesis that human males generally display greater variability in traits than human females do. It has often been discussed in relation to human cognitive ability, where some studies appear to show that males are more likely than females to have either very high or very low IQ test scores. In this context, there is controversy over whether such sex-based differences in the variability of intelligence exist, and if so, whether they are caused by genetic differences, environmental conditioning, or a mixture of both. Wikipedia
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Lying about women in posts like this:

Where is the proof that anyone, much less "the modern feminist movement" has tricked anyone?


Note the extreme hatred of women in this post. It's common among JPP MAGAts and indicates to me that they are alone, angry and not in a loving relationship with a woman:
Click to expand...
I guess one would actually have to do research instead of listening to democrat and feminist talking points. maybe you should try that sometime instead of falling back on your liberal tendencies to demand some official link and government study to prove what anyone says that you disagree with. real world experience beats a government study any day of the week.
 
Sammy Jankis said:

Variability hypothesis​



The variability hypothesis, also known as the greater male variability hypothesis, is the hypothesis that human males generally display greater variability in traits than human females do. It has often been discussed in relation to human cognitive ability, where some studies appear to show that males are more likely than females to have either very high or very low IQ test scores. In this context, there is controversy over whether such sex-based differences in the variability of intelligence exist, and if so, whether they are caused by genetic differences, environmental conditioning, or a mixture of both. Wikipedia
Click to expand...
Well, Fredo, it's easy to see which side of the curve you and your fellow MAGAts fall on. Sad.

a02l7a.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
SmarterthanYou said:
I guess one would actually have to do research instead of listening to democrat and feminist talking points. maybe you should try that sometime instead of falling back on your liberal tendencies to demand some official link and government study to prove what anyone says that you disagree with. real world experience beats a government study any day of the week.
Click to expand...
I'll pray for you tonight that your life improves and that you can lift yourself out of the cesspool you've placed yourself.
 
Sammy Jankis said:

Variability hypothesis​



The variability hypothesis, also known as the greater male variability hypothesis, is the hypothesis that human males generally display greater variability in traits than human females do. It has often been discussed in relation to human cognitive ability, where some studies appear to show that males are more likely than females to have either very high or very low IQ test scores. In this context, there is controversy over whether such sex-based differences in the variability of intelligence exist, and if so, whether they are caused by genetic differences, environmental conditioning, or a mixture of both. Wikipedia
Click to expand...
Show some respect. You started your existence as a female until your seventh week in utero.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Wrong.


They did a non-scientific test using a single measure of something far more complex. Show me where they "spoke to scientists and Dr's" about this other than maybe their staff doing a Google search.

I have no idea how many tests of what sort it would require or the sample size necessary. I do know that the small sample using their own staff in a single method test proves little to nothing in this case.
Click to expand...
Not wrong but you are stupid.

Again, if we say men, as a group, can lift more weight then women, as a group, we do not have to show every single example to prove it and using sample data is the typical way such things are proven even if magats deny that. Showing tests set up to test that, even if not exhaustive (as you want them to be) are acceptable proof even if they are just an example.

Feel free to watch the entire episode including from where this Dr and Pain Specialist talks to them and helps them set up the test to provide the proof.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top