Clintons New Hampshire lead has shrunk from 23-10 in a month

I would be happy to see someone else besides Hil in the top spot.

I dont think she would be a bad President but I really dont like the Bush, Clinton ,Bush ,Clinton idea.
 
The sad thing is no one voted for war. They voted to trust Bush to use all diplomatic means first. Bush did not , he went staright to war. The people who gave Bush the benifit of the doubt in a very turbulent time in our history should not be held responsible for his dishonesty.
 
i wouldn't say very long.. 10points can evaporate in a week. I can see obama taking Clinton out 1991 Clinton style.
 
Desh said:
The sad thing is no one voted for war. They voted to trust Bush to use all diplomatic means first. Bush did not , he went staright to war. The people who gave Bush the benifit of the doubt in a very turbulent time in our history should not be held responsible for his dishonesty.
Click to expand...
Oh please. The guy who actually ran on becoming more aggressive with Iraq in 2000 and that we need to impose "regime change"? Only the retarded have the excuse that they "didn't know". It's why I wouldn't ever vote for Kerry or Clinton, they are simply too stupid, by their own admission of being "tricked", to ever get my vote. Seriously, only those who are even more retarded can be fooled by a fool who told them exactly what they wanted to do during the campaign, then went and did it when they gave him to the power to do so.
 
Desh said:
The sad thing is no one voted for war. They voted to trust Bush to use all diplomatic means first. Bush did not , he went staright to war. The people who gave Bush the benifit of the doubt in a very turbulent time in our history should not be held responsible for his dishonesty.
Click to expand...


I hold clinton accoutable for being bush's enabler.

The only people I can at least feel modestly comfortable about with regard to iraq, are people like Chuck Hagel and John Edwards who at least owned up to and apologized for voting for the resolution.
 
Hillary Girl is sweating it out.

I saw that the national polls have tightened since the last debate, as well. I think Hillary loses Iowa if the primary is today. If the national polls get tighter, that could really mean something.

Here's hoping...
 
I don't know why these polls keep using registered democrats.

They should be polling likely caucus goers and likely primary voters.
 
Cypress said:
I hold clinton accoutable for being bush's enabler.

The only people I can at least feel modestly comfortable about with regard to iraq, are people like Chuck Hagel and John Edwards who at least owned up to and apologized for voting for the resolution.
Click to expand...


Exactly, they have come out and said it was a mistake to trust Bush with such power.
 
There was an interesting article on MSNBC yesterday how - at this time in the primary season - every poll except for a few over the past 3 decades had a frontrunner who ended up losing.

Hillary started running out the clock too early; really, almost her entire campaign has been "safe", since she was the frontrunner from the get go, and it's starting to be fairly obvious that she's doing her best to be all things to all people.
 
I've seen a few polls that say when the lead is as huge as it is now it's virtually a lock.
that's how dems and cons are acting, it's Hillary
Too bad I like Richardson best
 
I say edwards has the worst shot amoung dems
Hillary, Obama, RIchardson are the viable ones
Edwards is Mondale reincarnated
 
uscitizen said:
Edwards will be da man!
Click to expand...

I would love to see Edwards, because I think he's the best candidate, and because so many people have completely written him off.

Tough to envision, though; Obama has a much more realistic shot.

They should combine forces. An Obama/Edwards ticket would be pretty formidable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top