Colorado a key state for Democrats?

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15426114/from/RS.1/

Republicans struggling in Colorado
In normally strong Bush state, governor and three House seats at risk

The governorship and three GOP-held House seats are within Democratic reach in the state that backed a Republican in the past three presidential elections and is home to military bases and the prominent religious conservative group Focus on the Family.

A confluence of growing voter unease with the Iraq war, President Bush's sagging poll numbers and Republican blunders and intraparty fighting have undercut the GOP - a reality Republicans acknowledge.

The wild west?
"The West is probably going to be a good battleground to watch and see if we're in a period of change," said Republican Rep. Bob Beauprez, who is running for governor.

It's Beauprez's seat in the Denver suburbs that Democrats consider one of their best chances of winning.

The largely blue-collar district is nearly evenly split among Democrats, Republicans and independent voters. It narrowly went for Democratic Sen. John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election.

The two national parties have spent slightly more than $1 million apiece on the race.

"People have had enough with the White House and Republican leadership in Congress," said Democrat Ed Perlmutter, a former Colorado state senator running against Republican Rick O'Donnell. "They've lost complete touch with the people of Colorado."

Battle over Iraq, Social Security, immigration
Perlmutter has a slight edge in recent polls for the open seat race, thanks in part to people like Robert Benallo, an unaffiliated voter and retired heavy machine operator.

Benallo is leaning toward voting for Perlmutter because he is worried his grandsons might be sent to fight in Iraq.

"I think the war in Iraq is a mistake," Benallo said. "This is personal."

O'Donnell, 36, acknowledges he faces an uphill battle partly because of his party. He is hoping his youthful looks and ideas translate into a fresh face that could change Washington. O'Donnell is a former director of the state Commission on Higher Education.

But O'Donnell also had to apologize early in the campaign for writing a paper 12 years ago calling for the government to "slay" Social Security. He has since enrolled his mother in Social Security and said he now thinks experts should start from scratch to overhaul the program.

But voters like Donald Abell still say they don't believe him.
 
This is very true the Ds are making headway here because of the religious conservatives who lead the party currently, and because of the war...
 
If you listen to MSNBC the dems have it all in the bag, so no need for anyone to vote. The dems have won.
 
If you listen to MSNBC the dems have it all in the bag, so no need for anyone to vote. The dems have won.
It's one of the problems they may have. If they convince enough people that they are inevitable it may keep some of their side home thinking that their vote isn't needed....
 
This is very true the Ds are making headway here because of the religious conservatives who lead the party currently, and because of the war...

Yeah, the religious conservatives do turn people off. The Republicans in Washington state have been bothered by that group as well. In the primaries for years the Democrats were consistently crossing party lines and voting for the most radical conservative Christian on the ballot especially for Governor, this usually put the most radical Republican in the general election where they were summarily trounced. In fact, things got so bad that the Republicans had to finally change the primary process here to stop party line crossing. Now they are generally able to nominate a less wild-eyed Bible toting candidate but they haven't really been much more successful for all of that.
 
It has been my contention for years that the Religious Right is the bane of the Republican Party... They are too large to ignore, and to vocal and dedicated to leave the Western Republicans (or libertarian-leaners) alone...

They take over caucuses because they are more dedicated to their cause, and set the agenda by default.
 
It has been my contention for years that the Religious Right is the bane of the Republican Party... They are too large to ignore, and to vocal and dedicated to leave the Western Republicans (or libertarian-leaners) alone...

They take over caucuses because they are more dedicated to their cause, and set the agenda by default.

As Thom Hartmann says you and your friends have to take an active role in the caucus process by organizing and going en mass and fighting for the turf. They all get together at their churches, you have to find other places to congregate and organize and then stage a caucus coup and take it back.
 
As Thom Hartmann says you and your friends have to take an active role in the caucus process by organizing and going en mass and fighting for the turf. They all get together at their churches, you have to find other places to congregate and organize and then stage a caucus coup and take it back.
It is what I do...

I created the RLC Caucus in our County, and that is exactly what I work toward. Simply, we must take the party back or live in the hypocrisy of "Personal Freedom" and "Religious-based Law"...
 
Id consider voting for the Republican party canidates if they would abandon the Religous Right and condem them.
 
Back
Top