Confidence Restored in Our Election Process No Thanks to Republicans

LurchAddams

LurchAddams

There Can be Only One!
ONE OF THE GOOD THINGS THE J6 PANEL HAS DONE FOR THIS NATION IS TO RESTORE CONFIDENCE IN OUR ELECTORAL PROCESS.

NO REPUBLICAN HAS, RATHER THEY'VE EXPLOITED THE BIG LIE TO PUT UP MORE BARRIERS TO DEMOCRATS VOTING.

REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO HAVE A HARD TIME JUSTIFYING THEIR EXISTENCE NOW.
 
LurchAddams said:
ONE OF THE GOOD THINGS THE J6 PANEL HAS DONE FOR THIS NATION IS TO RESTORE CONFIDENCE IN OUR ELECTORAL PROCESS.

NO REPUBLICAN HAS, RATHER THEY'VE EXPLOITED THE BIG LIE TO PUT UP MORE BARRIERS TO DEMOCRATS VOTING.

REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO HAVE A HARD TIME JUSTIFYING THEIR EXISTENCE NOW.
Click to expand...

:tardthoughts:
 
LurchAddams said:
ONE OF THE GOOD THINGS THE J6 PANEL HAS DONE FOR THIS NATION IS TO RESTORE CONFIDENCE IN OUR ELECTORAL PROCESS.

NO REPUBLICAN HAS, RATHER THEY'VE EXPLOITED THE BIG LIE TO PUT UP MORE BARRIERS TO DEMOCRATS VOTING.

REPUBLICANS ARE GOING TO HAVE A HARD TIME JUSTIFYING THEIR EXISTENCE NOW.
Click to expand...

Biden is wrong to ignore the threat to democracy by the GOP and Trump. If he fails to direct AG Garland to indict Trump, our nation is over.
 
BidenPresident said:
Biden is wrong to ignore the threat to democracy by the GOP and Trump. If he fails to direct AG Garland to indict Trump, our nation is over.
Click to expand...

I really don't think so. I think treating it as a civil matter, and suing trump rather than charging him criminally, then taking everything he owns, would be ok.

I'd consider that justice. It would destroy him to have to beg for a job to pay his massive tax debt.
 
LurchAddams said:
I really don't think so. I think treating it as a civil matter, and suing trump rather than charging him criminally, then taking everything he owns, would be ok.

I'd consider that justice. It would destroy him to have to beg for a job to pay his massive tax debt.
Click to expand...

Don't agree.
 
BidenPresident said:
Don't agree.
Click to expand...

Well, are you gonna hit WalMart and armor up? You're going to have to, if there are pictures of twump on TV being led away in an orange suit and chains. He's literally Jesus to these fucks, I'm telling you.

But if he is convicted and jailed, and I'm still alive afterwards, I shall come back to this thread and tell you you were right.
 
LurchAddams said:
Well, are you gonna hit WalMart and armor up? You're going to have to, if there are pictures of twump on TV being led away in an orange suit and chains. He's literally Jesus to these fucks, I'm telling you.

But if he is convicted and jailed, and I'm still alive afterwards, I shall come back to this thread and tell you you were right.
Click to expand...


Tired of cowardly Dems.
 
the J6 Kangaroo court has insured a lack of confidence in the election system by stacking the panel with highly partisan players playing to a script.

well done donkeys. its amazing how well you can f*ck up things as you do.
 
Celticguy said:
the J6 Kangaroo court has insured a lack of confidence in the election system by stacking the panel with highly partisan players playing to a script.

well done donkeys. its amazing how well you can f*ck up things as you do.
Click to expand...

A hearing. Not a court. You right wingers would fail a 6th grade civics test.
 
BidenPresident said:
Tired of cowardly Dems.
Click to expand...

Suck my dick. Let me tell you how just how tough I am! For two decades, I slept with a poisonous reptile in my bed -

My ex-wife.

I'm not being cowardly. I'm not afraid of a fight, if it's worth it, believe me. I just think there can be a solution where rednecks aren't walking down Pennsylvania Avenue with ARs picking off everyone in a suit.

Did you think 1/6 would happen.. the riot part, I mean.
 
evince said:
https://www.lawfareblog.com/independence-and-accountability-department-justice
Click to expand...

The presidential authority to direct and control an administration is especially clear with respect to law enforcement and national security, the story goes, since the President himself has a constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” and is the “Commander in Chief.”

This is a nice theory. Sometimes (though not often) I wish that it were so. But the theory has been repudiated in law, and especially in practice, for a long time. There are far too many examples to cover, but here are a few relevant ones. The President can generally fire his political appointees at will, though the Supreme Court has long upheld certain statutory limitations on the President’s removal power (including in the context of the Clinton-era independent counsel statute). The FBI Director’s ten-year term—through which Congress signaled that the Director has independence from electoral politics—raises the political stakes for a President who fires an FBI Director mid-term, as President Trump learned last year. And career civil servants below these senior political appointees (like just-retired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) have extensive legal protections against presidential firing.

Those are the main “legal” guarantees of DOJ/FBI independence. They are very few, and they are not the most important. The most important guarantees of DOJ/FBI come not from the Constitution or statutes, but from norms and practices that since Watergate have emerged within the Executive branch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top