Robo
Verified User
U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D) NJ, decided to ignore all of the U.S. Senate’s agreed historical and traditional ethical standards and give unprecedented testimony in opposition to a fellow Senator in his confirmation hearing before the Senate committee’s hearing to confirm Jeff Sessions as the Trump administration’s Attorney General.
What should we think about Booker’s decision to do so?
Since Booker presented nothing new that hadn’t already been gone over by the committee’s other questioners, What if anything could Booker’s motivation be? Well let’s see. The Democrat party being in total disarray since the election of Donald Trump, seems hysterically searching for a candidate to challenge Trump in 2020. Booker has been mention by some Democrats as a likely possible candidate for the Presidency and the party’s second black candidate for that nomination. Another “Great Black Hope” of the Democrats?
Who among us is naive enough to not know that Booker, (by his unprecedented testimony before the Session’s conformation hearing), wasn’t simply trolling for face time notoriety to prepare for a 2020 Presidential bid?
What should we think about Booker’s decision to do so?
Since Booker presented nothing new that hadn’t already been gone over by the committee’s other questioners, What if anything could Booker’s motivation be? Well let’s see. The Democrat party being in total disarray since the election of Donald Trump, seems hysterically searching for a candidate to challenge Trump in 2020. Booker has been mention by some Democrats as a likely possible candidate for the Presidency and the party’s second black candidate for that nomination. Another “Great Black Hope” of the Democrats?
Who among us is naive enough to not know that Booker, (by his unprecedented testimony before the Session’s conformation hearing), wasn’t simply trolling for face time notoriety to prepare for a 2020 Presidential bid?