Could New Landmark Election Validity Lawsuit in Maryland Affect 2024 Election?

domer76 said:
In the entire history of mankind, “if” has never happened. You claim fraud when your citation does not.

So, asswipe, that makes you either stupid or a liar. Obviously, you fit both descriptions.
Click to expand...

That votes are available that can be given to the candidate of someones choosing is serious business. You have proven once again how un- American you are.
 
domer76 said:
In the entire history of mankind, “if” has never happened. You claim fraud when your citation does not.

So, asswipe, that makes you either stupid or a liar. Obviously, you fit both descriptions.
Click to expand...

This action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief from deficient voter registration rolls leading to violations of Federal and state laws, the certification of results from a provably flawed, inaccurate, and obscure process outside the view of impartial witnesses or the public, including the use of voting systems in Maryland that are believed to have void EAC certifications in violation of federal law, and the refusal of the Maryland State Board of Elections to comply with Public Information Act (PIA) requests and Federally required transparency.

Meticulous analysis of the official Maryland State Voter Registration Database reveals a minimum of 79,392 current apparent registration violations…The analysis revealed 1,699 instances of duplicate registrations, 25,084 instances of registrants with questionable inactive status, 3,366 instances of active registrations without a certified US Post Office mailing address, 5,680 instances of active registrants who moved at least 4 years ago, 605 instances of registrations with no residential address, 296 instances of active registrants with a nonstandard address, 1,218 instances of active registrants who are deceased, 883 instances of age discrepant registration (younger than 18 or older than 115), and 40,518 instances of questionable registration date.

In sum, the voting system error rates are exponentially above the maximum allowable error rates. Inaccuracy and the specter of fraud have irretrievably damaged the reliability and credibility of results.

Rock solid case.
 
coldjoint said:
This action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief from deficient voter registration rolls leading to violations of Federal and state laws, the certification of results from a provably flawed, inaccurate, and obscure process outside the view of impartial witnesses or the public, including the use of voting systems in Maryland that are believed to have void EAC certifications in violation of federal law, and the refusal of the Maryland State Board of Elections to comply with Public Information Act (PIA) requests and Federally required transparency.

Meticulous analysis of the official Maryland State Voter Registration Database reveals a minimum of 79,392 current apparent registration violations…The analysis revealed 1,699 instances of duplicate registrations, 25,084 instances of registrants with questionable inactive status, 3,366 instances of active registrations without a certified US Post Office mailing address, 5,680 instances of active registrants who moved at least 4 years ago, 605 instances of registrations with no residential address, 296 instances of active registrants with a nonstandard address, 1,218 instances of active registrants who are deceased, 883 instances of age discrepant registration (younger than 18 or older than 115), and 40,518 instances of questionable registration date.

In sum, the voting system error rates are exponentially above the maximum allowable error rates. Inaccuracy and the specter of fraud have irretrievably damaged the reliability and credibility of results.

Rock solid case.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I saw the numbers. I saw “questionable”, “apparent”, etc. I saw “deceased”, “moved”, “duplicate”, “inactive”, as if those are some huge problem. What I didn’t see was “fraud”. That’s your claim.
 
domer76 said:
Yeah, I saw the numbers. I saw “questionable”, “apparent”, etc. I saw “deceased”, “moved”, “duplicate”, “inactive”, as if those are some huge problem. What I didn’t see was “fraud”. That’s your claim.
Click to expand...

Those people are not real and they voted. They are asking how they voted when the registrations are clearly not up to standards and never should have been accepted. They can prove all of it. You do not have to call it fraud but I consider it just that. Either way it makes the election invalid. I do not see the court disagreeing with them.
 
coldjoint said:
Those people are not real and they voted. They are asking how they voted when the registrations are clearly not up to standards and never should have been accepted. They can prove all of it. You do not have to call it fraud but I consider it just that. Either way it makes the election invalid. I do not see the court disagreeing with them.
Click to expand...

One more fucking time, idiot.

Voter REGISTRATION is not the same as VOTES
 
coldjoint said:
5 million invalid registrations in NY. And the fact people are being appointed not elected by election officials and their bosses should bother everyone.

https://discern.tv/could-new-landmark-election-validity-lawsuit-in-maryland-affect-2024-election/
Click to expand...

Discern TV is a video and article aggregating outlet that adheres to a politically conservative and Christian worldview. It is edited by JD Rucker out of Southern California and is currently privately funded through premium subscriptions on his Substack.
 
Last edited:
domer76 said:
One more fucking time, idiot.

Voter REGISTRATION is not the same as VOTES
Click to expand...

One more time if that registration is OK to vote those votes are stolen and given to candidate of their choice. They will prove the registrations are not valid and that "person" voted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top