Crime Laws Named After People Are Generally Bad Ideas

F

FUCK THE POLICE

911 EVERY DAY
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/6/16/182136/398

Crime Laws Named After People Are Generally Bad Ideas
By Jeralyn, Section Legislation


Radley Balko, Senior Editor of Reason, takes on one of my pet peeves in an interview in the Atlantic: crime laws named after individuals. He says (linking to this TChris Post):

Here's a pretty good rule of thumb: If you're naming a piece of crime legislation after a crime victim, it's probably a bad law. It means you're legislating out of anger, or in reaction to public anger over a specific incident. That's generally not how good policy is made.
Click to expand...

Or, as I like to put it, Let us not enact laws out of grief and passion, or in response to a singular criminal event, however horrific it might be. Cooler heads are needed where our fundamental liberties are at stake. Examples: The Laci and Connor Law. Megan's Law. The Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act.

I'm also not thrilled with Attorney General Eric Holder's proposal today for a federal hate crimes law, for reasons well noted by Colorado Independent.
 
Likewise be wary of laws with stuff like "freedom" "Blue Skies" "Wonderful Day" "Right to Work" And other wonderful sounding themes in them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top