View: https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1987127978820767814?s=20
The claims made in the X post by @WallStreetApes regarding the fraud involving the Safari Restaurant in Minneapolis are largely verifiable based on the information available up to the current date.
Here's a breakdown of the key points and their verifiability:
The context provided by related web results reinforces the verifiability of the core claims regarding the fraud scheme, the discrepancies in meal counts, and the involvement of state entities.In summary, the claims are verifiable through multiple sources, including legal proceedings, news reports, and official investigations, up to the current date.
The fraud scheme involving the Safari Restaurant and the Feeding Our Future nonprofit is one of the largest documented cases of its kind in the United States, with extensive documentation available.
The claims made in the X post by @WallStreetApes regarding the fraud involving the Safari Restaurant in Minneapolis are largely verifiable based on the information available up to the current date.
Here's a breakdown of the key points and their verifiability:
- $12 Million in Federal Child Meal Payments: The claim that the Safari Restaurant took $12 million in federal child meal payments is supported by reports from reputable sources. The Feeding Our Future scandal, which involved multiple defendants, including those associated with the Safari Restaurant, has been extensively covered by news outlets like NPR and the Minnesota Star Tribune. These reports confirm that the scheme involved significant sums of money, with the total fraud amounting to $250 million across various entities.
- Claim of Feeding 4,000-6,000 Kids a Day: The post claims that the restaurant stated it was feeding 4,000 to 6,000 children daily. This is consistent with the testimony and evidence presented during the trials related to the Feeding Our Future case. Prosecutors and FBI investigations revealed that the defendants claimed to serve millions of meals, which were largely fictional.
- Average of 40 People During 6 Weeks: The assertion that the restaurant only averaged 40 people during six weeks of surveillance is also verifiable. FBI surveillance, as mentioned in the video and reported by news outlets, showed a significant discrepancy between the claimed number of meals served and the actual foot traffic at the site. This was a critical piece of evidence in the trials.
- Fake Names and Invoices: The use of fake names and invoices to create rosters of children who were supposedly served meals is well-documented in the legal proceedings. The jury was shown evidence of websites used to generate random names and ages, which were then used to substantiate fraudulent claims.
- Minneapolis Department of Education Awareness: The claim that the Minneapolis Department of Education was aware of the fraud and did nothing is supported by state audits and investigations. Reports indicate that the Minnesota Department of Education had red flags about the impossible meal counts and reimbursement requests but failed to act decisively, contributing to the scale of the fraud.
- Tim Walz's Involvement: The implication that Tim Walz personally knew and did nothing is more speculative but is part of the broader narrative of systemic failure within state oversight. While there is no direct evidence that Walz was personally involved, the criticism of his administration's handling of such frauds is a common theme in political discourse and media coverage.
The context provided by related web results reinforces the verifiability of the core claims regarding the fraud scheme, the discrepancies in meal counts, and the involvement of state entities.In summary, the claims are verifiable through multiple sources, including legal proceedings, news reports, and official investigations, up to the current date.
The fraud scheme involving the Safari Restaurant and the Feeding Our Future nonprofit is one of the largest documented cases of its kind in the United States, with extensive documentation available.