FUCK THE POLICE
911 EVERY DAY
Why is it the Encyclopadia Brittanica makes no mention of your solar emmissions global warming hypothesis?
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9037044/global-warming
Why is it that I can only find it on wikipedia and right wing blogs?
Why can't you except the reality of the carbon emmissions theory, and still puff out your stupid solar emmissions hypohtesis? Even if solar emmissions were changing, it's at a goddamn awful convenient time, just as carbon emmissions thorughout the world are at their highest.
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9037044/global-warming
Why is it that I can only find it on wikipedia and right wing blogs?
Why can't you except the reality of the carbon emmissions theory, and still puff out your stupid solar emmissions hypohtesis? Even if solar emmissions were changing, it's at a goddamn awful convenient time, just as carbon emmissions thorughout the world are at their highest.