Darla wanna debate something so we can have red names ?

uscitizen

uscitizen

Villified User
AHZ has shown it needs not be a serious debate. Just declare victory and move on.
We can debate whether Rice dyes her hair or not if you want :)
 
uscitizen said:
AHZ has shown it needs not be a serious debate. Just declare victory and move on.
We can debate whether Rice dyes her hair or not if you want :)
Click to expand...

LOL!

That is so funny, because I was thinking of saying to DAmo, look if all there is to these debate things, is for me to challenge someone, and then when they spend like an hour writing this long thesis on it, I can say "I'm not reading that, you lose, I win", and it's over, then I want in.
 
Darla said:
LOL!

That is so funny, because I was thinking of saying to DAmo, look if all there is to these debate things, is for me to challenge someone, and then when they spend like an hour writing this long thesis on it, I can say "I'm not reading that, you lose, I win", and it's over, then I want in.
Click to expand...
Hey, it worked for Dubya. :)
 
Why bother with debating? Just PM Damo, and ask him to turn your name Red.

Damo's cool, and I'm sure he doesn't really care ;)
 
Oh just red for me to match my neck :D

actually I would prefer Blue to match my political leaning, but then Purple is red and blue combined which is more accurate I suppose....
 
Darla said:
LOL!

That is so funny, because I was thinking of saying to DAmo, look if all there is to these debate things, is for me to challenge someone, and then when they spend like an hour writing this long thesis on it, I can say "I'm not reading that, you lose, I win", and it's over, then I want in.
Click to expand...

But in truth, there was more to it than that. Ornot's "argument" is simply refusing to apply the word discrimination where it actually fits. Holding him to the actual definitions of words is all it took. It WAS easy, but it was also a substantive win.
 
AssHatZombie said:
But in truth, there was more to it than that. Ornot's "argument" is simply refusing to apply the word discrimination where it actually fits. Holding him to the actual definitions of words is all it took. It WAS easy, but it was also a substantive win.
Click to expand...

you're delusions of grandeur never end do they?
 
Darla said:
LOL!

That is so funny, because I was thinking of saying to DAmo, look if all there is to these debate things, is for me to challenge someone, and then when they spend like an hour writing this long thesis on it, I can say "I'm not reading that, you lose, I win", and it's over, then I want in.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that'd piss me off.

That's really why all of us debaters go angry at AHZ - Ornot made like an hourlong post, then AHZ goes, doesn't read it, and makes a stupid one line retort. After that point, just about no one had any sympathy for AHZ.
 
Watermark said:
Yeah, that'd piss me off.

That's really why all of us debaters go angry at AHZ - Ornot made like an hourlong post, then AHZ goes, doesn't read it, and makes a stupid one line retort. After that point, just about no one had any sympathy for AHZ.
Click to expand...

his post was an explanation of how he woud use racial information to discriminate. All i had to do is accurately use language.
 
AssHatZombie said:
his post was an explanation of how he woud use racial information to discriminate. All i had to do is accurately use language.
Click to expand...
All you had to do was to try and change from one definition of "discrimination" to another. Which I knew perfectly well you'd try to do: your kind always do. That's why I explicitly specified which definition of the word I was concerned with at the outset.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top