Democrats proposed an war income tax surcharge

Chapdog

Abreast of the situations
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrats on Tuesday proposed an income tax surcharge to finance the approximately $150 billion annual cost of operations in Iraq, saying it is unfair to pass the cost of the war onto future generations.

The plan, unveiled by Reps. David Obey, D-Wis., John Murtha, D-Pa., and Jim McGovern, D-Mass., would require low- and middle-income taxpayers to add 2 percent to their tax bill. Wealthier people would pay an additional 12 to 15 percent, Obey said.

The plan's sponsors acknowledged it's unlikely to pass, but Democrats have been seeking in recent weeks to compare the approximately $190 billion cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in 2008 with the $23 billion increase that Democrats want in domestic programs. President Bush has threatened to veto most of those domestic spending bills.

"The war will cost future generations billions of dollars in taxes that we're shoving off on them and it is devouring money that could be used to expand their educational opportunities, expand their job training possibilities, attack our long-term energy problems and build stronger communities," Obey said.

Obey also announced that Democrats will not pass a supplemental spending bill for the Iraq war until next year, when Democrats hope public pressure could force Bush to change the course of the war.

Democrats hope their chances of winning a battle with Bush on the war will be better next year as the election season heats up.

"The showdown is going to be in January or February," McGovern said.

The lawmakers said the tax surcharge was similar to policies put in place to pay for the Vietnam War and World War II.

"By putting together this bill we hope people will stop ignoring what this war is costing American taxpayers and call the president's bluff on fiscal responsibility," Obey said.


Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
The moral thing to do, is for us to pay for Bush's war, rather than passing it on to our kids.

An even better idea, is to check voter registration rolls, and make only republicans pay the tax. ;)
 
The moral thing to do, is for us to pay for Bush's war, rather than passing it on to our kids.

An even better idea, is to check voter registration rolls, and make only republicans pay the tax. ;)
Since ballots are secret would you do it by psychic ability or assumption?
 
Nope...........

The moral thing to do, is for us to pay for Bush's war, rather than passing it on to our kids.

An even better idea, is to check voter registration rolls, and make only republicans pay the tax. ;)


Make Commies pay for it...after all ya caused it!
 
LOL. It's kind of funny seeing what he is saying, while y'all can't.

How do you think they caused it?
 
so 150Billion divided by say 300M people = 500 a pop. but i doubt everyone would pay more like 100M payers so 1500 per year per payer?
 
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrats on Tuesday proposed an income tax surcharge to finance the approximately $150 billion annual cost of operations in Iraq, saying it is unfair to pass the cost of the war onto future generations.

The plan, unveiled by Reps. David Obey, D-Wis., John Murtha, D-Pa., and Jim McGovern, D-Mass., would require low- and middle-income taxpayers to add 2 percent to their tax bill. Wealthier people would pay an additional 12 to 15 percent, Obey said.

The plan's sponsors acknowledged it's unlikely to pass, but Democrats have been seeking in recent weeks to compare the approximately $190 billion cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in 2008 with the $23 billion increase that Democrats want in domestic programs. President Bush has threatened to veto most of those domestic spending bills.

"The war will cost future generations billions of dollars in taxes that we're shoving off on them and it is devouring money that could be used to expand their educational opportunities, expand their job training possibilities, attack our long-term energy problems and build stronger communities," Obey said.

Obey also announced that Democrats will not pass a supplemental spending bill for the Iraq war until next year, when Democrats hope public pressure could force Bush to change the course of the war.

Democrats hope their chances of winning a battle with Bush on the war will be better next year as the election season heats up.

"The showdown is going to be in January or February," McGovern said.

The lawmakers said the tax surcharge was similar to policies put in place to pay for the Vietnam War and World War II.

"By putting together this bill we hope people will stop ignoring what this war is costing American taxpayers and call the president's bluff on fiscal responsibility," Obey said.


Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Chappie, I am glad you told me about this absurd plan on the part of the dimocrats, to pay as you go? RJS wants to know, where do they get off, when, the President told us right after 9/11, if you want to help, go shopping, which unlike the dims who are too poor to shop, and too stupit to find the malls anyway, I have been doing? Now, they want me to pay for the war, that is bullsheet and I for one will not put up with it? This might be enough to get me to march on washington, I did once, when they tried to take my guns, lead by the fatso, Michael Moo Moore, RJS went to Washington and said sorry moo you will get my gun only when you can take it out of my cold dead hands, touche.
 
LOL. It's kind of funny seeing what he is saying, while y'all can't.

How do you think they caused it?

Damocles, try not the show off your stupitity, RJS will have to mensa this for you? Who do you think was in those planes on 9/11, Chicago Economic schoolers, wake up please, this is embarrassing?
 
The moral thing to do, is for us to pay for Bush's war, rather than passing it on to our kids.

An even better idea, is to check voter registration rolls, and make only republicans pay the tax. ;)

Sometimes you make me so mad I start to see "red", no pun attended? Let me try and explain something to you, dimmie, and that thing is this, economic freedom is moore important than political freedom, and if it is moore important than political freedom, than it is moore important than anything, capisce? Economic freedom = low or no taxes, no matter what, RJS says, pass the bill on to the little fuckers, all they do is make noise in my neighborhood when I am trying to sleep anyway, butt, either way I must have my economic freedom, thank you.
 
the 2.6 Trillion projected income us tax payers are funding the governemnt should be more then enough to cover the 150B
 
the 2.6 Trillion projected income us tax payers are funding the governemnt should be more then enough to cover the 150B

Sorry, the idiots in DC are too busy wasting that money on the big dig, the bridge to nowhere etc... Not to mention all the other complete government waste.
 
That figures..........

To you, of course.


You are running for office...must stay a little left of middle...how sad damo...you will not be elected anymore than Al Or John (Kerry that is) ya can't have your cake and eat it too! Just a fact of life...only strong right or strong left ever win! Which side are you really on...your call amigo!
 
No shit. just goes to show you the huge amount in revenue we produce is still not enough for governments ridiculous appetite.

its never enough. they could be collecting 3.5T and still be talking about tax increases.
 
You are running for office...must stay a little left of middle...how sad damo...you will not be elected anymore than Al Or John (Kerry that is) ya can't have your cake and eat it too! Just a fact of life...only strong right or strong left ever win! Which side are you really on...your call amigo!
I am not running for office and if I was in my area I would likely have to be very right of middle.
 
I get it now. Only when you propose such policies as universal healthcare do you need a plan to pay for it. War is the expenditure that pays for itself, just like tax cuts.

Morons.
 
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrats on Tuesday proposed an income tax surcharge to finance the approximately $150 billion annual cost of operations in Iraq, saying it is unfair to pass the cost of the war onto future generations.

The plan, unveiled by Reps. David Obey, D-Wis., John Murtha, D-Pa., and Jim McGovern, D-Mass., would require low- and middle-income taxpayers to add 2 percent to their tax bill. Wealthier people would pay an additional 12 to 15 percent, Obey said.

The plan's sponsors acknowledged it's unlikely to pass, but Democrats have been seeking in recent weeks to compare the approximately $190 billion cost of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in 2008 with the $23 billion increase that Democrats want in domestic programs. President Bush has threatened to veto most of those domestic spending bills.

"The war will cost future generations billions of dollars in taxes that we're shoving off on them and it is devouring money that could be used to expand their educational opportunities, expand their job training possibilities, attack our long-term energy problems and build stronger communities," Obey said.

Obey also announced that Democrats will not pass a supplemental spending bill for the Iraq war until next year, when Democrats hope public pressure could force Bush to change the course of the war.

Democrats hope their chances of winning a battle with Bush on the war will be better next year as the election season heats up.

"The showdown is going to be in January or February," McGovern said.

The lawmakers said the tax surcharge was similar to policies put in place to pay for the Vietnam War and World War II.

"By putting together this bill we hope people will stop ignoring what this war is costing American taxpayers and call the president's bluff on fiscal responsibility," Obey said.


Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

lol stupid dims

why you hatin on the iraq war? follow the course! we cant pull out nmow or else we'll have terrorist attacks from saddam all ovber the place

why you hat e the rich? what did they ever do to you? why you stealin from them for you stupid socialist "childrens" healht? lemme tell ya our children dont need that fiddly diddly voodoo stuff from docotrs they need DISCPLINE and CHRST
 
Back
Top