Democrats: The Nazi Among Them

Knuckles Z

Verified User

Democrats’ Embrace of Candidate with Nazi Tattoo Proves ‘Violent Individuals Have Taken over Party’​


All the Nazis, Commies and freaks can be found in the Democrat party.

✅

1. The candidate is Graham Platner, a Democrat running for U.S. Senate in Maine.

This is the individual Breitbart is referring to.

2. Platner

He stated he got it while drunk on leave in Croatia and did not know its association at the time.He has since covered the tattoo after learning its meaning.This is confirmed by the Associated Press and multiple mainstream outlets.

3. Democrats did

Mainstream reporting shows:

  • The tattoo revelation caused internal Democratic backlash.
  • The party establishment preferred another candidate (Gov. Janet Mills).
  • Platner said he was being targeted by opponents within the Democratic Party.None of this supports the claim that Democrats “embraced” the tattoo.

4. Claims that he gave a “Nazi salute” are unverified.

Fact‑checking shows:

  • Only partisan commentary sites pushed the “Nazi salute” narrative.
  • No mainstream outlet confirmed it was intentional.
  • The gesture in photos was ambiguous.

❌

Breitbart framed the situation as:

  • Democrats “embracing” a Nazi‑tattooed candidate
  • Proof that “violent individuals have taken over the party”
  • Evidence that “Nazis, Commies and freaks” are in the Democratic Party
None of these claims are supported by the factual reporting. Breitbart’s article uses:

  • Loaded language (“violent individuals,” “Nazi tattoo”)
  • Guilt‑by‑association (one candidate = entire party)
  • Speculation presented as certainty (“signaling to Jew‑haters”)
  • Omission of context (tattoo origin, cover‑up, internal Democratic criticism)
This is a classic example of partisan framing, not neutral reporting.


🔍

Breitbart

  • Strong right‑wing editorial stance
  • Frequently uses sensational framing around Democrats
  • Opinion pieces often presented alongside news content
  • Uses emotionally charged language to generalize about political groups

Mainstream outlets (AP, Guardian, US News)

  • Reported the tattoo controversy factually
  • Included Platner’s explanation, Democratic backlash, and campaign context
  • Did not generalize about the Democratic Party as a whole

📌

  • One Democratic candidate had a problematic tattoo from his early 20s.
  • He covered it and said he didn’t know its meaning at the time.
  • Democrats did not “embrace” Nazis — the party establishment actually preferred another candidate.
  • Claims that this proves “Nazis and Commies are in the Democrat party” are political rhetoric, not evidence.
 

Democrats’ Embrace of Candidate with Nazi Tattoo Proves ‘Violent Individuals Have Taken over Party’​


All the Nazis, Commies and freaks can be found in the Democrat party.
Come on, kid. Everyone knows if he was a NAZI he'd run as a republican.
 
All Americans are inherently totalitarian in thought and deed. The idea that such leanings are solely the province of one political party or the other is foolish in the extreme.
 

Democrats’ Embrace of Candidate with Nazi Tattoo Proves ‘Violent Individuals Have Taken over Party’​


All the Nazis, Commies and freaks can be found in the Democrat party.

Yep, pretty much. Scratch a commie and you will likely find a sexual deviant as well; they're joined at the hip, like homosexual rights groups and NAMBLA. They also have their favorite Joo Hate sites, like this one:


Most of the commies here probably visit that one daily.
 

Democrats’ Embrace of Candidate with Nazi Tattoo Proves ‘Violent Individuals Have Taken over Party’​


All the Nazis, Commies and freaks can be found in the Democrat party.
Maybe you ought to consider using vocabulary that you understand.
 
Back
Top