not even close to an annihilation, then again, WM sees a dem talk and orgasms in his pants
1. 5 billion is not a lot of money when compared to overall h/c.....dumbest fucking argument ever. he just said it was a lot of money, then to argue its not really a lot.
2. argues that we tort reform will cause doctors not to be more careful, essentially that if we cap awards, they will not care about their patients as much. again, stupid argument....and then he argues, well....but our bill includes things that will help them not make mistakes and kill a hundred thousand people a year....yeah....what? he is really suggesting that doctors, hospitals, nurses won't be more careful because awards are capped? stupid argument.
3. the award cap of 250K is absurd and should never be considered. it is stupid.
4. if med mal awards have decreased by over 4 billion dollars, how is it med mal insurance continues to rise?
5. the argument about giving up your federal funded insurance (congress) is the dumb argument. if i work at boeing and get X insurance, does that mean because you don't work at boeing that you're entitled to the same insurace i am evne though you don't work for my company? the argument proffered by durbin is a logical fallacy because they get that insurance because they work for the federal government and they wrote that policy themselves.
if he wants to go that route, then everyone should have the same plan as congress. hey durbin, if the public option or whatever you're advocating is good enough for the common folk, why don't you use that same insurance.