Did Monsanto Take a Hit During the Shutdown?

Dantès

New member
I don’t know how long this will last with all the lobbyists Monsanto has on salary at one moment. In fact they might be one of the companies with the most lobbiests but it felt good to read this when I first saw it. I sure hope they can get it to stick but it will be tough.

How Congress Just Stuck It to Monsanto
Zoë Carpenter on October 17, 2013 - 2:54 PM ET

Other than reopening the government and averting a global financial crisis, one good thing about the funding bill passed last night was that it put an end to a corporate giveaway known colloquially as the Monsanto Protection Act.

Formally called the Farmer Assurance Provision, the measure undermined the Department of Agriculture’s authority to ban genetically modified crops, even if court rulings found they posed risks to human and environmental health. Republican Senator Roy Blunt worked with the genetically modified seed giant Monsanto to craft the initial rider, and it was slipped into a funding resolution that passed in March. There was concern that an agreement to end the shutdown would extend the provision, which is set to expire at the end of the month.

Jon Tester, a farmer and Democratic senator from Montana, removed the measure from the bill yesterday. “All [the Farmer Assurance Provision] really assures is a lack of corporate liability,” Tester argued in March. “It…lets genetically modified crops take hold across the country—even when a judge finds it violates the law.”

The Monsanto Protection Act incited strong opposition from food safety and civil liberties advocates, as well as food businesses, environmentalists and groups representing family farmers. Although it was temporary, the rider curtailed already weak oversight over the handful of agro-giants that control the GMO market by allowing crops that a judge ruled were not properly approved to continue to be planted.

Striking the rider from the continuing resolution probably won’t do much to limit Monsanto’s influence in Washington, unfortunately. The company knows how to work the revolving door: former chair of the Senate Agriculture Committee Blanche Lincoln has recently been hired as a lobbyist. Monsanto spent $6.3 million on lobbying in 2011, surpassing all other agribusinesses besides the tobacco company Altria. Lately, the company has vigorously fought against state-led efforts to label GM foods, and reportedly lobbied for amendments to the Farm Bill to prohibit such labeling.

http://www.thenation.com/blog/176719/how-congress-just-stuck-it-monsanto
 
This is nothing but conspiratard nonsense.

Sec. 735. In the event that a determination of non-regulated status made pursuant to section 411 of the Plant Protection Act is or has been invalidated or vacated, the Secretary of Agriculture shall, notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon request by a farmer, grower, farm operator, or producer, immediately grant temporary permit(s) or temporary deregulation in part, subject to necessary and appropriate conditions consistent with section 411(a) or 412(c) of the Plant Protection Act, which interim conditions shall authorize the movement, introduction, continued cultivation, commercialization and other specifically enumerated activities and requirements, including measures designed to mitigate or minimize potential adverse environmental effects, if any, relevant to the Secretary’s evaluation of the petition for non-regulated status, while ensuring that growers or other users are able to move, plant, cultivate, introduce into commerce and carry out other authorized activities in a timely manner: Provided, That all such conditions shall be applicable only for the interim period necessary for the Secretary to complete any required analyses or consultations related to the petition for non-regulated status: Provided further, That nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting the Secretary’s authority under section 411, 412 and 414 of the Plant Protection Act.

All it did was allow a farmer to protect crops that had been previously given non regulated status from immediate destruction for being out of regulation. It is simply there to allow a due process protection to farmers.

There is absolutely no proof that GMOs are dangerous to human health and little reason to believe they ever will be.
 
Back
Top