Did Obama ignore ambassador Stevens requests for increased security?

Don't conservatives want to cut government spending and downsize?
 
I believe the security he requested was for a differing city than the one he was killed in.
 
I believe the security he requested was for a differing city than the one he was killed in.

You'll believe anything if it don't reflect poorly on your boy......like a mommy that can't believe her son is a bully.

Obama is an incompetent ass that is directly responsible for those 4 dead at the consulate...then lied his ass off to the US citizens....

The proof is in the emails and in the statements already known from the security and intelligence people......

face the facts about that jerk for once in your life
 
I believe the security he requested was for a differing city than the one he was killed in.

An attempt was made on Steven's life in Tripoli .. where the common Libyan people are. He RAN to Benghazi, home of Al Queda and the world's
hotbed of lawlessness and terrorism .. WHERE HE FELT SAFE. He felt safer among the terrorists than he did among the Libyan people.

The Libyans got him anyway.

That is the secret they don't want told.
 
An attempt was made on Steven's life in Tripoli .. where the common Libyan people are. He RAN to Benghazi, home of Al Queda and the world's
hotbed of lawlessness and terrorism .. WHERE HE FELT SAFE. He felt safer among the terrorists than he did among the Libyan people.

The Libyans got him anyway.

That is the secret they don't want told.


The The U.S. consulate happens to be IN Benghazi and his going there had nothing to do with being among "the terrorists".....
that conclusion was pretty lame....
 
CAP senior fellow and budget expert Scott Lilly noted last month that in the last two years, Congress has cut the Obama administration’s request for funding to increase diplomatic staffing and boost embassy security:

[E]ven more inexcusable are the repeated and deep cuts made to embassy security and construction. Thousands of our diplomatic personnel are serving overseas in facilities that do not come close to meeting the minimal requirements for security established by the so-called Inman commission’s report on overseas diplomatic security to President Ronald Reagan’s secretary of state more than two decades ago.

Nor is it likely to change anytime soon. In the 2011 continuing resolution, Congress, at the insistence of the House of Representatives, slashed the president’s request for embassy security and construction and forced another cut in fiscal year 2012. Altogether Congress has eliminated $296 million from embassy security and construction in the last two years with additional cuts in other State Department security accounts.

Lilly notes that more funding cuts for the U.S. Foreign Service are set to come under the sequestration required under the Budget Control Act. “Those cuts are largely the result of the draconian and unrealistically low budget caps placed by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) on all discretionary spending,” Lilly said.

http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/03/946031/pelosi-embassy-security-funding/


Who's responsible for embassy security? Who doesn't care about the safety of our personnel overseas? Who is slashing the budget at a time when more security is needed?

I really wish you wingnuts would do a little research before you open your beer holes.
 
The The U.S. consulate happens to be IN Benghazi and his going there had nothing to do with being among "the terrorists".....
that conclusion was pretty lame....

Stevens wasn't killed in a consulate, he was killed in rented villas that had little security.

State Department Covers Up Ambassador Stevens’ Death at Rented Villa in Benghazi
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/10/state-department-covers-up-ambassador.html

mideast-libya-us-22067495jpg1-300x183.jpg


You're wrong.
 
Stevens wasn't killed in a consulate, he was killed in rented villas that had little security.

State Department Covers Up Ambassador Stevens’ Death at Rented Villa in Benghazi
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/10/state-department-covers-up-ambassador.html

mideast-libya-us-22067495jpg1-300x183.jpg


You're wrong.

Yeah, he went there as a 'safe house' because the consulate was in eminent danger of attack......
the safe house was supposed to be a secret location that was revealed to the terrorists by ?
No matter, neither were safe and neither had the security that was begged for and refused by the Obama admin.

and again....his going there or anywhere had nothing to do with being among "the terrorists" as you claim he preferred....still lame.


This was your claim....

He RAN to Benghazi, home of Al Queda and the world's
hotbed of lawlessness and terrorism .. WHERE HE FELT SAFE. He felt safer among the terrorists than he did among the Libyan people.
 
Yeah, he went there as a 'safe house' because the consulate was in eminent danger of attack......
the safe house was supposed to be a secret location that was revealed to the terrorists by ?
No matter, neither were safe and neither had the security that was begged for and refused by the Obama admin.

and again....his going there or anywhere had nothing to do with being among "the terrorists" as you claim he preferred....still lame.

WRONG again.

The Obama Administration has put out numerous different stories on what happened .. because they don't want truth told.

I'm sure they're glad that you have their back. :0)

Inform yourself .. don't be a stooge. If you want to know who killed Stevens .. go here

Benghazi Attack. Libya’s Green Resistance Did It… And NATO Powers Are Covering Up
http://www.globalresearch.ca/libyas-green-resistance-did-it-and-nato-powers-are-covering-up/

Apply a bit of critical thinking to that .. and an epiphany should be on the way to your brain.

Benghazi was the base of operations for the CIA in Libya .. which is why the number of them who had to be evacuated was a surprise to everyone ,, but those who know what's going on.
 
Why Benghazi? Why did the CIA set up shop in the land of Al Queda terrorists where Stevens felt comfortable enough to ride his bike unprotected?

Because Stevens was their paymaster.

Blowback in Benghazi: Attack Linked to Regime Change Operations in Libya and Syria

Questions have been asked why Ambassador Chris Stevens had such a small security entourage when he visited Benghazi in Eastern Libya. The answer to that is that Stevens believed that he was safe because he routinely worked with Libyan militant groups in the area.

Ambassador Stevens was the US coordinator in Bengahzi during the uprising against Ghadaffi, coordinating the same groups of Libyan Jihadi groups that now provide much of the foreign manpower used to overthrow the Syrian regime.

Some background: The Ambassador arrived clandestinely in Benghazi in April 2011 on a Greek freighter and took up residence in that city to coordinate the US role in the anti-Ghadafi uprising centered in that city. It was his presence there, to a major degree, that ultimately convinced President Obama to okay US involvement in the NATO airstrikes that destroyed the armored column approaching that city, a key event in the toppling of that regime.

A statement of condolence issued by the Libyan Ambassador to the United States, states Stevens "served as the principal liaison of the U.S. to the opposition in Libya and he helped coordinate the U.S. response" to events on the ground, including efforts to rebuild and integrate radical Islamists into the government. http://news.blogs.cnn.com/...

Francis Townsend, a ranking Bush White House counterterrorism advisor was close to Stevens, according to CNN: http://security.blogs.cnn.com/...


She counted Stevens as a friend and said she spent time with him just two weeks ago.

"I was in Tripoli on a business trip," she said. "He was not only a friend, but I think to give our viewers some context, Chris Stevens had a particular sort of affinity for Benghazi," she said. "He in D.C. in 2007 when I was in the White House...He was there with me when I traveled to speak to Moammar Ghadafi. [Stevens] knew the rebels in Benghazi. He felt very comfortable there.

---

The Libyan Province which contains Benghazi and Derna was noted in a 2007 West Point study of the origin of the majority of suicide bombers in Iraq.

A December 2007 West Point study examining the background of foreign guerrilla fighters — jihadis or mujahedin, including suicide bombers — crossing the Syrian border into Iraq during the 2006-2007 timeframe, under the auspices of the international terrorist organization Al Qaeda. This study is based on a mass of about 600 Al Qaeda personnel files which were captured by US forces in the fall of 2007. The resulting study permits us to make important findings about the mentality and belief structures of the northeastern Libyan population that is furnishing the basis for the rebellion, permitting important conclusions about the political nature of the anti-Qaddafi revolt in these areas.
The most striking finding which emerges from the West Point study is that the corridor which goes from Benghazi to Tobruk, passing through the city of Darnah (also transliterated as Derna) them represents one of the greatest concentrations of jihadi terrorists to be found anywhere in the world, and by some measures can be regarded as the leading source of suicide bombers anywhere on the planet. Darnah, with one terrorist fighter sent into Iraq to kill Americans for every 1,000 to 1,500 persons of population, emerges as suicide bomber heaven, easily surpassing the closest competitor, which was Riyad, Saudi Arabia.

According to West Point authors Joseph Felter and Brian Fishman, Saudi Arabia took first place as regards absolute numbers of jihadis sent to combat the United States and other coalition members in Iraq during the time frame in question. Libya, a country less than one fourth as populous, took second place. Saudi Arabia sent 41% of the fighters. According to Felter and Fishman, “Libya was the next most common country of origin, with 18.8% (112) of the fighters listing their nationality stating they hailed from Libya.” Other much larger countries were far behind: “Syria, Yemen, and Algeria were the next most common origin countries with 8.2% (49), 8.1% (48), and 7.2% (43), respectively. Moroccans accounted for 6.1% (36) of the records and Jordanians 1.9% (11).”

This means that almost one fifth of the foreign fighters entering Iraq across the Syrian border came from Libya, a country of just over 6 million people. A higher proportion of Libyans were interested in fighting in Iraq than any other country contributing mujahedin. Felter and Fishman point out: “Almost 19 percent of the fighters in the Sinjar Records came from Libya alone. Furthermore, Libya contributed far more fighters per capita than any other nationality in the Sinjar Records, including Saudi Arabia.”
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/...o-Regime-Change-Operations-in-Libya-and-Syria
 
Back
Top