Discussion. Why False flag attacks?

HangTheWen

New member
We are all very familiar with the subject of staged Terrorist attacks or mass shooting.
So I would like to know what do you think are the reasons in which one might execute such a great theatrical performance?

What would thier intrest or thier motive?
 
It's not a difficult question. There are people that still want to be kings. They need to control you. False flags help them get control
 
A Conversation With Herman Goering

During the Nuremberg Trials in Germany after World War 2, Nazi leader Herman Goering was interviewed by Gustav Gilbert, an American intelligence officer. Goering said: "Of course the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. . . . But after all it is the leaders of the country that determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along."

Gustav Gilbert replied: "There is one difference. In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in America only Congress can declare wars."

Goering replied: "Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the will of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."


http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/41-admitted-false-flag-attacks.html
 
We are all very familiar with the subject of staged Terrorist attacks or mass shooting.
So I would like to know what do you think are the reasons in which one might execute such a great theatrical performance?

What would thier intrest or thier motive?

Simple answer is to play with people's emotions to gain support for a cause. The U.S. would not have invaded Iraq had WMD not been mentioned. Fear was used to gain support for the attack. If WMD wasn't mentioned there would be NO support for overthrowing Saddam. They could have been military action used but it wouldn't have been to overthrow him.
 
Back
Top