Former Senator John Kerry will do anything to save his Iran Nuclear Deal, including advising an enemy government to attack unmanned drones:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...s-Parasites-Or-Traitors&p=2917187#post2917187
Happily, President Trump split the nest of traitors:
Senator Vomit is Israel’s senator:
Senator Vomit went to Senator Graham to beat the drums of war without making it look like the U.S. military is going to war for Israel:
VIDEO ▼
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6050571867001/?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips
Senators Schumer and Graham are going to run into a lot trouble fighting for Israel. Most Democrats are in Iran’s corner. Most Democrats are always in an enemy’s corner. Not enough Republicans are convinced a war over shipping lanes is enough to vote for congressional approval (the commander in chief does not need it anyway).
VIDEO ▼
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6050579692001/?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips
NOTE: Carlson is wrong about Vietnam. The Vietnam and Korean Wars were the right wars for the right reason at the the right time.
A good case can be made for a war against Iran, but Israel should fight it as a matter of self-preservation.
Bottom line: The U.S. military must defend its allies when negotiations fail. That is true of Israel —— with one precondition. President Trump should give Israel all the weapons and technical support it needs to defeat Iran. Committing the U.S. military to fight alongside Israel must be the last recourse activated only if and when Iran starts winning. Iran’s ayatollahs knowing the U.S. marines are coming might be enough to convince Iran’s military people not to fight a war they cannot win.
Kerry is up to his old tricks in Iran:
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...s-Parasites-Or-Traitors&p=2917187#post2917187
Happily, President Trump split the nest of traitors:
June 21 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump approved military strikes on Friday against Iran in retaliation for the downing of an unmanned $130-million surveillance drone, but pulled back from launching the attacks, the New York Times said.
Trump had initially approved strikes on a handful of targets such as radar and missile batteries, the paper cited senior administration officials involved in, or briefed on, the deliberations, as saying.
The strikes were set to take place just before dawn on Friday to minimize risk to the Iranian military or to civilians, it added.
Planes were in the air and ships were in position, but no missiles fired, when the order to stand down came, it cited one senior administration official as saying.
The abrupt reversal put a halt to what would have been Trump's third military action against targets in the Middle East, the paper added, saying Trump had struck twice at targets in Syria, in 2017 and 2018.
However, it is not clear whether attacks on Iran might still go forward, the paper said, adding that it was not known if the cancellation of strikes had resulted from Trump changing his mind or administration concerns regarding logistics or strategy.
Trump had initially approved strikes on a handful of targets such as radar and missile batteries, the paper cited senior administration officials involved in, or briefed on, the deliberations, as saying.
The strikes were set to take place just before dawn on Friday to minimize risk to the Iranian military or to civilians, it added.
Planes were in the air and ships were in position, but no missiles fired, when the order to stand down came, it cited one senior administration official as saying.
The abrupt reversal put a halt to what would have been Trump's third military action against targets in the Middle East, the paper added, saying Trump had struck twice at targets in Syria, in 2017 and 2018.
However, it is not clear whether attacks on Iran might still go forward, the paper said, adding that it was not known if the cancellation of strikes had resulted from Trump changing his mind or administration concerns regarding logistics or strategy.
Trump reportedly approved, then called off Iran strikes
Thomson Reuters
Jun 21st 2019 2:07AM
https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...proved-then-called-off-iran-strikes/23753837/
Thomson Reuters
Jun 21st 2019 2:07AM
https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...proved-then-called-off-iran-strikes/23753837/
Senator Vomit is Israel’s senator:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said that the Democratic members urged the president not to make any decisions without congressional approval.
"Now I told the president that these conflicts have a way of escalating. The president may not intend to go to war here but we're worried that he and the administration may bumble into a war. We told the room that the Democratic position is that congressional approval must be required before funding any conflict with Iran," Schumer said.
"Now I told the president that these conflicts have a way of escalating. The president may not intend to go to war here but we're worried that he and the administration may bumble into a war. We told the room that the Democratic position is that congressional approval must be required before funding any conflict with Iran," Schumer said.
Trump says he believes strike by Iran was not intentional
By Grace Segers
Updated on: June 20, 2019 / 5:19 PM / CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-says-iran-made-a-very-big-mistake/
By Grace Segers
Updated on: June 20, 2019 / 5:19 PM / CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-says-iran-made-a-very-big-mistake/
Senator Vomit went to Senator Graham to beat the drums of war without making it look like the U.S. military is going to war for Israel:
VIDEO ▼
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6050571867001/?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips
Senators Schumer and Graham are going to run into a lot trouble fighting for Israel. Most Democrats are in Iran’s corner. Most Democrats are always in an enemy’s corner. Not enough Republicans are convinced a war over shipping lanes is enough to vote for congressional approval (the commander in chief does not need it anyway).
VIDEO ▼
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6050579692001/?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips
NOTE: Carlson is wrong about Vietnam. The Vietnam and Korean Wars were the right wars for the right reason at the the right time.
A good case can be made for a war against Iran, but Israel should fight it as a matter of self-preservation.
Bottom line: The U.S. military must defend its allies when negotiations fail. That is true of Israel —— with one precondition. President Trump should give Israel all the weapons and technical support it needs to defeat Iran. Committing the U.S. military to fight alongside Israel must be the last recourse activated only if and when Iran starts winning. Iran’s ayatollahs knowing the U.S. marines are coming might be enough to convince Iran’s military people not to fight a war they cannot win.
