DNC drops brutal ad declaring "A vote for Stein is really a vote for Trump"

S

signalmankenneth

Verified User
Not only is a vote for Stein but also a vote for RFK and any other third part candidate is a vote for Trump?!! It is also a wasted vote too, better off keeping your dumb ass on the couch on election day?!!

Washington DC - The Democratic National Committee (DNC) recently released a new attack ad warning swing state voters that supporting Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein could help Donald Trump win re-election.

On Friday, the DNC shared a 30-second clip, which features a picture of Stein slowly morphing into a picture of Trump, as a narrator argues that Republicans are trying to boost the third-party candidate in hopes of siphoning votes from Democrat Kamala Harris.

"That's why a vote for Stein is really a vote for Trump," the narrator says in conclusion, followed by a clip of Trump stating, "I like her very much" because she "takes 100% from them."

According to The Washington Post, the DNC will air the ad in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania – all major battleground states.

Stein – who has run for president twice before and is polling under 1% – has made Palestinian liberation and the implementation of an arms embargo on Israel the focus of her campaign, garnering a spike in support from Muslim and Arab Americans, as well as young voters.

In a statement shared with The Hill, a DNC senior advisor said Trump "knows that she's his key to the White House," which is why he "praises her spoiler candidacy."

"The stakes of this election are too high to allow Stein to spoil it," the advisor added.

Jill Stein's campaign dismisses the "spoiler" criticism

The ad mentioned an interview Stein did with Newsweek back in September titled How and Why I Will Stop Kamala Harris Winning, in which she argued that Harris and the Democratic Party could not win without the support of Muslim Americans.

Stein went on to claim that Democrats could "win those votes back" if they "do a 180 on the genocide" in Gaza, but added she didn't believe it would happen, as they appear to be "sacrificing several swing states" instead.

Following the release of the ad, Stein campaign manager Jason Call described the DNC's ad to WPR as "false."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dnc-drops-brutal-ad-declaring-a-vote-for-stein-is-really-a-vote-for-trump/ar-AA1s7ox5

1729350827389.png
 
Non-viable, non-major party candidates are not something that I find myself able to respect.

The only thing that they can do is help the less wanted of the two major candidates to win...
and that's simply despicable.

Note the idiot Ralph Nader in 2000.
We started two wars and fucked up a natural disaster directly because of Nader.
The Iraq war in particular was ONLY to enrich war profiteers.

If Nader had been dragged out of his home and shot in the head,
that would be morally wrong, perhaps,
but it wouldn't have been stepping on my toes.
I hate that motherfucker.
I disrespect all candidates who either KNOW that they're not viable
or are too stupid to know.

If a non-major party candidate actually has a semi-serious chance, that's a different story.
It doesn't happen often.
 
signalmankenneth said:
Not only is a vote for Stein but also a vote for RFK and any other third part candidate is a vote for Trump?!! It is also a wasted vote too, better off keeping your dumb ass on the couch on election day?!!

Washington DC - The Democratic National Committee (DNC) recently released a new attack ad warning swing state voters that supporting Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein could help Donald Trump win re-election.

On Friday, the DNC shared a 30-second clip, which features a picture of Stein slowly morphing into a picture of Trump, as a narrator argues that Republicans are trying to boost the third-party candidate in hopes of siphoning votes from Democrat Kamala Harris.

"That's why a vote for Stein is really a vote for Trump," the narrator says in conclusion, followed by a clip of Trump stating, "I like her very much" because she "takes 100% from them."

According to The Washington Post, the DNC will air the ad in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania – all major battleground states.

Stein – who has run for president twice before and is polling under 1% – has made Palestinian liberation and the implementation of an arms embargo on Israel the focus of her campaign, garnering a spike in support from Muslim and Arab Americans, as well as young voters.

In a statement shared with The Hill, a DNC senior advisor said Trump "knows that she's his key to the White House," which is why he "praises her spoiler candidacy."

"The stakes of this election are too high to allow Stein to spoil it," the advisor added.

Jill Stein's campaign dismisses the "spoiler" criticism

The ad mentioned an interview Stein did with Newsweek back in September titled How and Why I Will Stop Kamala Harris Winning, in which she argued that Harris and the Democratic Party could not win without the support of Muslim Americans.

Stein went on to claim that Democrats could "win those votes back" if they "do a 180 on the genocide" in Gaza, but added she didn't believe it would happen, as they appear to be "sacrificing several swing states" instead.

Following the release of the ad, Stein campaign manager Jason Call described the DNC's ad to WPR as "false."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dnc-drops-brutal-ad-declaring-a-vote-for-stein-is-really-a-vote-for-trump/ar-AA1s7ox5

View attachment 33856
Click to expand...
Fuck you asshole, you supported the assassination of your political opponent so, fuck you!
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Non-viable, non-major party candidates are not something that I find myself able to respect.

The only thing that they can do is help the less wanted of the two major candidates to win...
and that's simply despicable.

Note the idiot Ralph Nader in 2000.
We started two wars and fucked up a natural disaster directly because of Nader.
The Iraq war in particular was ONLY to enrich war profiteers.

If Nader had been dragged out of his home and shot in the head,
that would be morally wrong, perhaps,
but it wouldn't have been stepping on my toes.
I hate that motherfucker.
I disrespect all candidates who either KNOW that they're not viable
or are too stupid to know.

If a non-major party candidate actually has a semi-serious chance, that's a different story.
It doesn't happen often.
Click to expand...
Everyone who voted for Nader in 2000, are responsible for the death of our troops in the Iraq War and the chaos of the middle-east that followed?!!
 
signalmankenneth said:
Everyone who voted for Nader in 2000, are responsible for the death of our troops in the Iraq War and the chaos of the middle-east that followed?!!
Click to expand...

signalmankenneth said:
Not only is a vote for Stein but also a vote for RFK and any other third part candidate is a vote for Trump?!! It is also a wasted vote too, better off keeping your dumb ass on the couch on election day?!!

Washington DC - The Democratic National Committee (DNC) recently released a new attack ad warning swing state voters that supporting Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein could help Donald Trump win re-election.

On Friday, the DNC shared a 30-second clip, which features a picture of Stein slowly morphing into a picture of Trump, as a narrator argues that Republicans are trying to boost the third-party candidate in hopes of siphoning votes from Democrat Kamala Harris.

"That's why a vote for Stein is really a vote for Trump," the narrator says in conclusion, followed by a clip of Trump stating, "I like her very much" because she "takes 100% from them."

According to The Washington Post, the DNC will air the ad in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania – all major battleground states.

Stein – who has run for president twice before and is polling under 1% – has made Palestinian liberation and the implementation of an arms embargo on Israel the focus of her campaign, garnering a spike in support from Muslim and Arab Americans, as well as young voters.

In a statement shared with The Hill, a DNC senior advisor said Trump "knows that she's his key to the White House," which is why he "praises her spoiler candidacy."

"The stakes of this election are too high to allow Stein to spoil it," the advisor added.

Jill Stein's campaign dismisses the "spoiler" criticism

The ad mentioned an interview Stein did with Newsweek back in September titled How and Why I Will Stop Kamala Harris Winning, in which she argued that Harris and the Democratic Party could not win without the support of Muslim Americans.

Stein went on to claim that Democrats could "win those votes back" if they "do a 180 on the genocide" in Gaza, but added she didn't believe it would happen, as they appear to be "sacrificing several swing states" instead.

Following the release of the ad, Stein campaign manager Jason Call described the DNC's ad to WPR as "false."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dnc-drops-brutal-ad-declaring-a-vote-for-stein-is-really-a-vote-for-trump/ar-AA1s7ox5

View attachment 33856
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Fuck you asshole, you supported the assassination of your political opponent so, fuck you!
 
https://twitter.com/x/status/1849488857688932791
Now that Tavis Smiley has exposed the DNC for sending him a list of questions with which to attack Jill Stein, there's a serious question to ask: are the DNC and Harris-Biden White House pressuring social media companies to shadow ban Stein and censor her supporters? As seen in the docs revealed through Murthy v. Missouri, as well as the Twitter files, the WH has engaged in this kind of subversive, anti-democratic activity before.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CIA via DNC.
 
signalmankenneth said:
Not only is a vote for Stein but also a vote for RFK and any other third part candidate is a vote for Trump?!! It is also a wasted vote too, better off keeping your dumb ass on the couch on election day?!!

Washington DC - The Democratic National Committee (DNC) recently released a new attack ad warning swing state voters that supporting Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein could help Donald Trump win re-election.

On Friday, the DNC shared a 30-second clip, which features a picture of Stein slowly morphing into a picture of Trump, as a narrator argues that Republicans are trying to boost the third-party candidate in hopes of siphoning votes from Democrat Kamala Harris.

"That's why a vote for Stein is really a vote for Trump," the narrator says in conclusion, followed by a clip of Trump stating, "I like her very much" because she "takes 100% from them."

According to The Washington Post, the DNC will air the ad in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania – all major battleground states.

Stein – who has run for president twice before and is polling under 1% – has made Palestinian liberation and the implementation of an arms embargo on Israel the focus of her campaign, garnering a spike in support from Muslim and Arab Americans, as well as young voters.

In a statement shared with The Hill, a DNC senior advisor said Trump "knows that she's his key to the White House," which is why he "praises her spoiler candidacy."

"The stakes of this election are too high to allow Stein to spoil it," the advisor added.

Jill Stein's campaign dismisses the "spoiler" criticism

The ad mentioned an interview Stein did with Newsweek back in September titled How and Why I Will Stop Kamala Harris Winning, in which she argued that Harris and the Democratic Party could not win without the support of Muslim Americans.

Stein went on to claim that Democrats could "win those votes back" if they "do a 180 on the genocide" in Gaza, but added she didn't believe it would happen, as they appear to be "sacrificing several swing states" instead.

Following the release of the ad, Stein campaign manager Jason Call described the DNC's ad to WPR as "false."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/dnc-drops-brutal-ad-declaring-a-vote-for-stein-is-really-a-vote-for-trump/ar-AA1s7ox5

View attachment 33856
Click to expand...
So unless you are going to vote for Trump or Harris you shouldn’t bother voting for the Senate, Congress, state representatives, state ballot measures, Mayor, city counsil or city ballot measures? One should just stay on the couch instead?

That’s an interesting view of democracy.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Non-viable, non-major party candidates are not something that I find myself able to respect.

The only thing that they can do is help the less wanted of the two major candidates to win...
and that's simply despicable.

Note the idiot Ralph Nader in 2000.
We started two wars and fucked up a natural disaster directly because of Nader.
The Iraq war in particular was ONLY to enrich war profiteers.

If Nader had been dragged out of his home and shot in the head,
that would be morally wrong, perhaps,
but it wouldn't have been stepping on my toes.
I hate that motherfucker.
I disrespect all candidates who either KNOW that they're not viable
or are too stupid to know.

If a non-major party candidate actually has a semi-serious chance, that's a different story.
It doesn't happen often.
Click to expand...
Rather surprising to see you wanting to murder a fellow socialist. And pretty surprising to see the war profiteering folks supporting the same candidate as you.
 
Here's the deal:

Any candidate can be liked or disliked depending on the platform they run on coupled with their history of public speaking on various issues.

That being said, it is crucial to remember that if someone votes for a 3rd party, it's because the Democrats and Republicans DID NOT MAKE THEIR CASE TO THAT VOTERS SATISFACTION. PERIOD.
 
cawacko said:
Rather surprising to see you wanting to murder a fellow socialist. And pretty surprising to see the war profiteering folks supporting the same candidate as you.
Click to expand...
That fellow socialist gave us the horrific George W. Bush.


I support both Ukraine and Israel, not the war profiteers.
I, in fact, have no problem nationalizing the war supply industries.
The war profiteers certainly don't want that.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Here's the deal:

Any candidate can be liked or disliked depending on the platform they run on coupled with their history of public speaking on various issues.

That being said, it is crucial to remember that if someone votes for a 3rd party, it's because the Democrats and Republicans DID NOT MAKE THEIR CASE TO THAT VOTERS SATISFACTION. PERIOD.
Click to expand...
Thank you. It is nowhere in the Constitution (or bible) that say Republicans and Democrats have a god given right to our vote. I always get a kick out of people saying how different the two parties are when in reality they work hand in hand to keep their monopoly so to speak and make it so others basically can't compete. Then you hear the "you're throwing your vote away" mantra after they rig the system.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
That fellow socialist gave us the horrific George W. Bush.


I support both Ukraine and Israel, not the war profiteers.
I, in fact, have no problem nationalizing the war supply industries.
The war profiteers certainly don't want that.
Click to expand...
Not a rhetorical question, how do you support Ukraine and Israel (and I'm not saying you shouldn't) without supporting the war profiteers?
 
Politically speaking, it does, obvious in a swing State like Michigan where the vote is projected to be razor thin an Arab American who normally would vote for the Democrat candidate voting for Stein for her views on Gaza would aid Trump’s efforts.
 
cawacko said:
Not a rhetorical question, how do you support Ukraine and Israel (and I'm not saying you shouldn't) without supporting the war profiteers?
Click to expand...
That's a valid question.
I went to war more than a half century ago SOLEY to support the war profiteers.

My war had ZERO to do with defending America or a close American ally,
Ngo Dinh Diem's South Vietnam not being one of them.
They were doing nothing for us.

Bush's Iraq War was another that had NO purpose other than to enrich war profiters.

In contrast, not defending Ukraine would be more akin to not defending Europe against Hitler
UNTIL Japan bombed Pearl Harbor and the Axis Powers DECLARED WAR ON US.
It was a mistake, both morally and tactically.

Not helping Israel eradicate Jihadists is to forget Jihadist aggression against the US.
Also, I don't believe in "proportional responses"
If somebody spits at you, it's fair to shoot them between the eyes.
The principle has already been set. That's what matters.

When the war profiteers gain in justifiable wars,
that's capitalism but not corporate crime.
But as I said, I'm OK with nationalizing them.
 
archives said:
Politically speaking, it does, obvious in a swing State like Michigan where the vote is projected to be razor thin an Arab American who normally would vote for the Democrat candidate voting for Stein for her views on Gaza would aid Trump’s efforts.
Click to expand...
Is it any different than someone like myself, a Republican who will not vote for Trump, voting for Chase Oliver as opposed to leaving the Presidential part of the ballot blank? If a left leaning Arab American isn't going to vote for Harris because of what's happening in Gaza do you think they would only do so by having Jill Stein as an option? Versus her not on the ballot and this person leaving it blank?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top