DOJ appeals special master ruling

floridafan

Verified User
The Justice Department is seeking to overturn a federal judge’s ruling that blocked investigators from reviewing a range of highly-sensitive documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

Prosecutors said in a new court filing that U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon’s decision to temporarily halt the FBI’s ability to probe the ex-president’s handling and storage of classified materials would cause “irreparable harm” to efforts by the intelligence community to protect national security interests.

n order to assess the full scope of potential harms to national security resulting from the improper retention of the classified records, the government must assess the likelihood that improperly stored classified information may have been accessed by others and compromised,” Justice Department counterintelligence chief Jay Bratt argued in the filing. “But that inquiry is a core aspect of the FBI’s criminal investigation.”
Cannon’s attempt to enjoin the FBI investigation while permitting a parallel national security review of the seized documents was simply unworkable, Justice Department officials argued.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/...ter-ruling-in-trump-mar-a-lago-probe-00055686
 
The Justice Department is seeking to overturn a federal judge’s ruling that blocked investigators from reviewing a range of highly-sensitive documents seized from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

Prosecutors said in a new court filing that U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon’s decision to temporarily halt the FBI’s ability to probe the ex-president’s handling and storage of classified materials would cause “irreparable harm” to efforts by the intelligence community to protect national security interests.

n order to assess the full scope of potential harms to national security resulting from the improper retention of the classified records, the government must assess the likelihood that improperly stored classified information may have been accessed by others and compromised,” Justice Department counterintelligence chief Jay Bratt argued in the filing. “But that inquiry is a core aspect of the FBI’s criminal investigation.”
Cannon’s attempt to enjoin the FBI investigation while permitting a parallel national security review of the seized documents was simply unworkable, Justice Department officials argued.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/...ter-ruling-in-trump-mar-a-lago-probe-00055686


Now why did they do that? Their shit is gonna get smacked down by any reasonable judges in America.

Guess what happens if it goes to the Supreme Court?

2217745-box_wwfsd2.png
 
Because the search was too broad, politically motivated, initiated by the president for political reasons, and total bullshit.

Thats you opinion, and as usual total bullshit.
Is it politically motivated to have documents stolen from the WH returned to the government where they belong?
Is it politically motivated to have trump retain highly sensitive documents many of which were sitting right on his desk?
 
Thats you opinion, and as usual total bullshit.
Is it politically motivated to have documents stolen from the WH returned to the government where they belong?
Is it politically motivated to have trump retain highly sensitive documents many of which were sitting right on his desk?

Fuck off, assface. You make a good case for Americans getting rid of motherfuckers like you.

Your parents should have taught you some discipline and not let you get away with lying.
 
Fuck off, assface. You make a good case for Americans getting rid of motherfuckers like you.

Your parents should have taught you some discipline and not let you get away with lying.

It would have been so simple for trump not to have stolen these documents in the first place.
Then he could have simply returned them after being asked to do so numerous times.

What lying?
 
Thats you opinion, and as usual total bullshit.
Is it politically motivated to have documents stolen from the WH returned to the government where they belong?
Is it politically motivated to have trump retain highly sensitive documents many of which were sitting right on his desk?

That's the Constitution. Fuck Off.
 
Because the search was too broad, against the 4th Amendment, politically motivated, initiated by the president for political reasons, and total bullshit.

Not true, Trump was holding top level security documents which he had no right to possess, actually mixing them about with other materials in nonsecure areas. Not only is that illegal, but possibly jeopardizes the security and safety of the United States

After months of being stonewalled and lied to, the Justice Dept had ever right to execute the search warrant, what’s surprising is that they didn’t do it earlier

Turn off Fox and you might get the real story
 
Not true, Trump was holding top level security documents which he had no right to possess, actually mixing them about with other materials in nonsecure areas. Not only is that illegal, but possibly jeopardizes the security and safety of the United States

After months of being stonewalled and lied to, the Justice Dept had ever right to execute the search warrant, what’s surprising is that they didn’t do it earlier

Turn off Fox and you might get the real story

Yes true. Illegal search and seizure.
 
Back
Top