Donald Trump's New Legal Options

Bourbon

In Yo Face!
legaldoom.jpg
 
Trump has spent a lifteiitme skirting laws, breaking them and using lawyers to stop those he harmed. That will not work now. He has left tracks and evidence. He has to face the music.
 
[h=1]A Running List Of Lawyers and Law Firms Who Have Refused To Represent President Trump[/h]https://abovethelaw.com/2018/03/a-r...sent-the-president-of-the-united-states/?rf=1

Here’s a running list of law firms and attorneys who have decided they don’t want to represent the president. Please send a note to tips@abovethelaw.com if there are firms that we’re missing or attorneys who have been approached that we just don’t know about. Here’s who we do know about:

Brendan Sullivan, Williams & Connolly: Sullivan represented Oliver North after the Iran-Contra scandal, but won’t represent Donald Trump.

Paul Clement, Kirkland & Ellis: Clement defended DOMA — the Defense of Marriage Act — and was a leading litigator in the constitutional challenges to Obamacare. But he won’t represent the leader of the Republican party.

Mark Filip, Kirkland & Ellis: Filip is a big-time white-collar defense lawyer who served as Deputy Attorney General in the George W. Bush administration. He was unwilling to return to government work to help defend the current president.

Robert Giuffra, Sullivan & Cromwell: Guiffra represents Volkswagon in its litigation about using devices to thwart clean-air standards, and defended UBS from disaffected Enron shareholders. Defending Trump’s financial dealings from Robert Mueller was apparently not something he wanted to do.

Emmet Flood, Williams & Connolly: Emmet Flood represented Bill Clinton in his impeachment hearing. Of course, Clinton was impeached (just not convicted), and we know that Trump prefers soldiers who never captured.

Robert S. Bennett, Hogan Lovells: Bennett represented Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones dispute. Seems relevant.

Theodore Olson, Gibson Dunn: Ted Olson represented George W. Bush in the Bush v. Gore case where the Supreme Court chose the American president. And he wants no part of Trump.​
 
he is used to lawyers who do his bidding and use trumps wealth to scare the fuck out of people instead of being good litigators



now no real litigator wants to work with him

he is known for not paying lawyers who dont do his bidding


he is also known as a BAD client that wont act in a manner his lawyers insist on
 
he is used to lawyers who do his bidding and use trumps wealth to scare the fuck out of people instead of being good litigators



now no real litigator wants to work with him

he is known for not paying lawyers who dont do his bidding


he is also known as a BAD client that wont act in a manner his lawyers insist on


Now he's afraid to Grab this Pussy :laugh:
 
[h=1]A Running List Of Lawyers and Law Firms Who Have Refused To Represent President Trump[/h]https://abovethelaw.com/2018/03/a-r...sent-the-president-of-the-united-states/?rf=1

Here’s a running list of law firms and attorneys who have decided they don’t want to represent the president. Please send a note to tips@abovethelaw.com if there are firms that we’re missing or attorneys who have been approached that we just don’t know about. Here’s who we do know about:

Brendan Sullivan, Williams & Connolly: Sullivan represented Oliver North after the Iran-Contra scandal, but won’t represent Donald Trump.

Paul Clement, Kirkland & Ellis: Clement defended DOMA — the Defense of Marriage Act — and was a leading litigator in the constitutional challenges to Obamacare. But he won’t represent the leader of the Republican party.

Mark Filip, Kirkland & Ellis: Filip is a big-time white-collar defense lawyer who served as Deputy Attorney General in the George W. Bush administration. He was unwilling to return to government work to help defend the current president.

Robert Giuffra, Sullivan & Cromwell: Guiffra represents Volkswagon in its litigation about using devices to thwart clean-air standards, and defended UBS from disaffected Enron shareholders. Defending Trump’s financial dealings from Robert Mueller was apparently not something he wanted to do.

Emmet Flood, Williams & Connolly: Emmet Flood represented Bill Clinton in his impeachment hearing. Of course, Clinton was impeached (just not convicted), and we know that Trump prefers soldiers who never captured.

Robert S. Bennett, Hogan Lovells: Bennett represented Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones dispute. Seems relevant.

Theodore Olson, Gibson Dunn: Ted Olson represented George W. Bush in the Bush v. Gore case where the Supreme Court chose the American president. And he wants no part of Trump.​

Why is this a big deal?
 
Poor desh...we all had high hopes that a couple of days of meditation would help...guess not...
 
[h=1]A Running List Of Lawyers and Law Firms Who Have Refused To Represent President Trump[/h]https://abovethelaw.com/2018/03/a-r...sent-the-president-of-the-united-states/?rf=1

Here’s a running list of law firms and attorneys who have decided they don’t want to represent the president. Please send a note to tips@abovethelaw.com if there are firms that we’re missing or attorneys who have been approached that we just don’t know about. Here’s who we do know about:

Brendan Sullivan, Williams & Connolly: Sullivan represented Oliver North after the Iran-Contra scandal, but won’t represent Donald Trump.

Paul Clement, Kirkland & Ellis: Clement defended DOMA — the Defense of Marriage Act — and was a leading litigator in the constitutional challenges to Obamacare. But he won’t represent the leader of the Republican party.

Mark Filip, Kirkland & Ellis: Filip is a big-time white-collar defense lawyer who served as Deputy Attorney General in the George W. Bush administration. He was unwilling to return to government work to help defend the current president.

Robert Giuffra, Sullivan & Cromwell: Guiffra represents Volkswagon in its litigation about using devices to thwart clean-air standards, and defended UBS from disaffected Enron shareholders. Defending Trump’s financial dealings from Robert Mueller was apparently not something he wanted to do.

Emmet Flood, Williams & Connolly: Emmet Flood represented Bill Clinton in his impeachment hearing. Of course, Clinton was impeached (just not convicted), and we know that Trump prefers soldiers who never captured.

Robert S. Bennett, Hogan Lovells: Bennett represented Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones dispute. Seems relevant.

Theodore Olson, Gibson Dunn: Ted Olson represented George W. Bush in the Bush v. Gore case where the Supreme Court chose the American president. And he wants no part of Trump.​

I am sorry but that is not true. Trump said the best are eager to help him. The top 10 in any profession are begging for a whitehouse job. If Trump says it, it must be so.
 
Not much to us, but a big deal for Trump when he testifies or goes to court.

Why does he need to go to court or testify?

He does need a lawyer you know. He is too stupid and impetuous to be able to control himself.

Nothing more here than a pile of TDS. Dunce.



Do you really not know it is a big deal? WOW.

I KNOW it is not a big deal; you still haven't coherently explained why it is one. Dunce.
 
Why does he need to go to court or testify?



Nothing more here than a pile of TDS. Dunce.





I KNOW it is not a big deal; you still haven't coherently explained why it is one. Dunce.

You are posting with absolutely no knowledge, as usual. Didn't Trump saying he would be glad to testify in front of Muller reach your bunker? Are you unaware that 5 of his peeps have pleaded guilty. Are you also too ignorant to know they are telling the investigators all. It is tough to deal with a idiot like you. You never know what is going on. But you fill a page with pictures and a passing insult. So sad.
 
You are posting with absolutely no knowledge, as usual. Didn't Trump saying he would be glad to testify in front of Muller reach your bunker?

I will ask you again because you seem to be at a loss to explain; why does he need to go to court to testify?

Are you unaware that 5 of his peeps have pleaded guilty.

How are they HIS PEEPS? What did they get charged with and how is that connected to Trump? Please try to use some facts instead of your typical emotional hyperbolic blather.

Are you also too ignorant to know they are telling the investigators all.

What are they telling the investigators? Link please.

It is tough to deal with a idiot like you. You never know what is going on. But you fill a page with pictures and a passing insult. So sad.

Irony; not only are you an idiot; but a smug arrogant one at that. Yet you have NOTHING but stupid conjecture and emotional hyperbolic bullshit. No facts. STFU already; we know you're a moron on steroids. You don't have to prove it every minute of the day.
 
Deflector get on board. https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-d...nald-trump-will-have-to-testify-about-russia/ Trump volunteered to testify in front of Mueller. he lied. He has no intention. However then comes the subpoena. nd before you say that words in MJ are not the same here. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-under-oath-in-u-s-russia-probe-idUSKBN1FD388

Still dishonestly avoiding answering a simple question. Let's try again; why does he need to go to court to testify?
 
Back
Top