Einstein's Lost Hypothesis

cancel2 2022

Canceled
When Ernest Sternglass walked up the steps at 112 Mercer Street in April 1947, he knew it would not be a normal day. Like a church deacon summoned to meet the Pope, Sternglass—a 23-year-old researcher at the Naval Ordnance Laboratory in Washington, D.C.—had arrived in Princeton, N.J., at the invitation of its most renowned resident, Albert Einstein. Having completed only a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering, he had written to Einstein earlier that month about the work he was doing in his lab. To his great surprise, not only did Einstein promptly write back, he requested that Sternglass visit Princeton to discuss the work in person.

What Sternglass didn’t know is that his visit to Einstein would set off a chain of correspondence, involving both an unpublished experiment (his) and an unpublished hypothesis (Einstein’s) that together may constitute one of the century’s most important disregarded pieces of science. The reason why the science was overlooked is plain enough: It was at least a generation ahead of its time. Now, more than half a century later, the work is being re-examined, with potentially profound implications for sustainable energy production. For Sternglass was to discover how to create free neutrons with household wall socket evergy levels—and Einstein was to explain why

Read more: http://m.nautil.us/issue/86/energy/einsteins-lost-hypothesis
 
The house at 112 Mercer Street today. I visit Princeton often...and walk past the house at every opportunity.


il_570xN.1729067862_n1fl.jpg

Albert Einstein sitting on the steps of the house back in the early 1950's.

EinsteinFuzzySlippers-1-480x600.jpg

Click on pictures to enlarge.
 
Well?

Is somebody going to take the Bull by the horns and do the research/development?

Don't look for the Oil companies to do it.

This is why Oil Companies should not be allowed to call themselves Energy companies.

Oil companies are too drunk on their own oil to look into the future!
 
The controlling equation is simply

E = ∆m * 931 MeV

m is in atomic mass units. The result gives the energy in electron volts (there are 931 million electron volts in one AMU).

So, I don't see how any of this has any great implications for sustainable energy as radioactive decay produces a pretty low amount of energy per action.
 
Well?

Is somebody going to take the Bull by the horns and do the research/development?

Don't look for the Oil companies to do it.

This is why Oil Companies should not be allowed to call themselves Energy companies.

Oil companies are too drunk on their own oil to look into the future!

You really do spout a load of bullshit!
 
The controlling equation is simply

E = ∆m * 931 MeV

m is in atomic mass units. The result gives the energy in electron volts (there are 931 million electron volts in one AMU).

So, I don't see how any of this has any great implications for sustainable energy as radioactive decay produces a pretty low amount of energy per action.

I suggest that you read this paper on the subject.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...ns_from_Hydrogen_The_Conclusive_Proof_of_LENR
 
Last edited:
The house at 112 Mercer Street today. I visit Princeton often...and walk past the house at every opportunity.


View attachment 15755

Albert Einstein sitting on the steps of the house back in the early 1950's.

View attachment 15756

Click on pictures to enlarge.

I went to Thomas Jefferson's Monticello in Virginia. Went inside his home. It was so surreal. There was a clock ticking over there. We couldn't get upstairs because it was so old it could collapse.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top