Enough with militias. Let’s call them what they really are: domestic terrorists

Bill

Malarkeyville
LIBERATE DC......................


This week the FBI announced charges in a plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. Much of the coverage referred to them as a militia – and the governor wasn’t having it

The vocabulary of violence
Terrorists (noun): evil brown people.

Thugs (noun): violent black people.

Militia (noun): misunderstood white men. Groups of heavily armed individuals whose actions, while not exactly ideal, deserve compassion and should be looked at within a wider socioeconomic context. Instead of rushing to judgment or making generalisations, one must consider the complex causes (economic anxiety, video games, mental health issues) that have triggered these poor guys into committing mass murder, conspiring to violently overthrow the state or plotting to kidnap government officials.

I’m afraid to say that the misunderstood white men have struck again – or attempted to, at least. On Thursday 13 men were charged in relation to an alleged plot to kidnap Michigan’s Democratic governor, Gretchen Whitmer. The plan was to, “grab the bitch”, as they put it, and then try her for “treason”. The eventual goal being to create “a society that followed the US Bill of Rights and where they could be self-sufficient”.

Much of the media coverage of Whitmer’s would-be kidnappers referred to them as members of a Michigan militia group called Wolverine Watchmen. The wolverine, by the way, isn’t just a Marvel character – it’s an animal that looks like a small bear but is actually part of the weasel family. This seems appropriate because “militia” is very much a weasel word. It’s a way to avoid putting white extremists in the same bucket as brown people. It lends them legitimacy. It obfuscates what these people really are.

Governor Whitmer, to her immense credit, was having none of it. “They’re not ‘militias’,” she tweeted on Friday morning. “They’re domestic terrorists endangering and intimidating their fellow Americans. Words matter.”


Trump’s words, Whitmer said in televised comments on Thursday, had served as a “rallying cry” to far-right extremists. Not only had the president refused to condemn white supremacists, he stood on the debate stage last week and told the Proud Boys, a violently racist gang, to “stand back and stand by”. When our leaders “stoke and contribute to hate speech, they are complicit”, Whitmer said.

It’s not just the White House that’s complicit, it’s the media. Kyle Rittenhouse, for example, the 17-year-old accused of killing two protesters in Wisconsin last month, was celebrated as a vigilante by rightwing outlets. “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” Tucker Carlson asked on Fox News. Far-right pundit Ann Coulter tweeted that she wanted the teenager “as my president”. The New York Post, meanwhile, published photos of Rittenhouse cleaning up graffiti; he was framed as a concerned citizen rather than a cold-blooded killer.

To be clear: double standards aren’t just a rightwing media problem. A study conducted by Georgia State University last year found that terror attacks carried out by Muslims receive on average 357% more media coverage than those committed by other groups. While this is clearly racist, it’s also dangerous. White supremacists, plenty of evidence shows, are the deadliest domestic threat facing the US. By downplaying the threat of white nationalist terrorism, by finding politer ways to refer to it, the media have allowed it to proliferate. So please, let’s call things by their name. Enough with the “militias”, these people are terrorists.
 
LIBERATE DC......................


This week the FBI announced charges in a plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. Much of the coverage referred to them as a militia – and the governor wasn’t having it

The vocabulary of violence
Terrorists (noun): evil brown people.

Thugs (noun): violent black people.

Militia (noun): misunderstood white men. Groups of heavily armed individuals whose actions, while not exactly ideal, deserve compassion and should be looked at within a wider socioeconomic context. Instead of rushing to judgment or making generalisations, one must consider the complex causes (economic anxiety, video games, mental health issues) that have triggered these poor guys into committing mass murder, conspiring to violently overthrow the state or plotting to kidnap government officials.

I’m afraid to say that the misunderstood white men have struck again – or attempted to, at least. On Thursday 13 men were charged in relation to an alleged plot to kidnap Michigan’s Democratic governor, Gretchen Whitmer. The plan was to, “grab the bitch”, as they put it, and then try her for “treason”. The eventual goal being to create “a society that followed the US Bill of Rights and where they could be self-sufficient”.

Much of the media coverage of Whitmer’s would-be kidnappers referred to them as members of a Michigan militia group called Wolverine Watchmen. The wolverine, by the way, isn’t just a Marvel character – it’s an animal that looks like a small bear but is actually part of the weasel family. This seems appropriate because “militia” is very much a weasel word. It’s a way to avoid putting white extremists in the same bucket as brown people. It lends them legitimacy. It obfuscates what these people really are.

Governor Whitmer, to her immense credit, was having none of it. “They’re not ‘militias’,” she tweeted on Friday morning. “They’re domestic terrorists endangering and intimidating their fellow Americans. Words matter.”



Trump’s words, Whitmer said in televised comments on Thursday, had served as a “rallying cry” to far-right extremists. Not only had the president refused to condemn white supremacists, he stood on the debate stage last week and told the Proud Boys, a violently racist gang, to “stand back and stand by”. When our leaders “stoke and contribute to hate speech, they are complicit”, Whitmer said.

It’s not just the White House that’s complicit, it’s the media. Kyle Rittenhouse, for example, the 17-year-old accused of killing two protesters in Wisconsin last month, was celebrated as a vigilante by rightwing outlets. “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” Tucker Carlson asked on Fox News. Far-right pundit Ann Coulter tweeted that she wanted the teenager “as my president”. The New York Post, meanwhile, published photos of Rittenhouse cleaning up graffiti; he was framed as a concerned citizen rather than a cold-blooded killer.

To be clear: double standards aren’t just a rightwing media problem. A study conducted by Georgia State University last year found that terror attacks carried out by Muslims receive on average 357% more media coverage than those committed by other groups. While this is clearly racist, it’s also dangerous. White supremacists, plenty of evidence shows, are the deadliest domestic threat facing the US. By downplaying the threat of white nationalist terrorism, by finding politer ways to refer to it, the media have allowed it to proliferate. So please, let’s call things by their name. Enough with the “militias”, these people are terrorists.
I agree that it’s time to call it domestic terrorism.
 
LIBERATE DC......................


This week the FBI announced charges in a plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. Much of the coverage referred to them as a militia – and the governor wasn’t having it

The vocabulary of violence
Terrorists (noun): evil brown people.

Thugs (noun): violent black people.

Militia (noun): misunderstood white men. Groups of heavily armed individuals whose actions, while not exactly ideal, deserve compassion and should be looked at within a wider socioeconomic context. Instead of rushing to judgment or making generalisations, one must consider the complex causes (economic anxiety, video games, mental health issues) that have triggered these poor guys into committing mass murder, conspiring to violently overthrow the state or plotting to kidnap government officials.

I’m afraid to say that the misunderstood white men have struck again – or attempted to, at least. On Thursday 13 men were charged in relation to an alleged plot to kidnap Michigan’s Democratic governor, Gretchen Whitmer. The plan was to, “grab the bitch”, as they put it, and then try her for “treason”. The eventual goal being to create “a society that followed the US Bill of Rights and where they could be self-sufficient”.

Much of the media coverage of Whitmer’s would-be kidnappers referred to them as members of a Michigan militia group called Wolverine Watchmen. The wolverine, by the way, isn’t just a Marvel character – it’s an animal that looks like a small bear but is actually part of the weasel family. This seems appropriate because “militia” is very much a weasel word. It’s a way to avoid putting white extremists in the same bucket as brown people. It lends them legitimacy. It obfuscates what these people really are.

Governor Whitmer, to her immense credit, was having none of it. “They’re not ‘militias’,” she tweeted on Friday morning. “They’re domestic terrorists endangering and intimidating their fellow Americans. Words matter.”


Trump’s words, Whitmer said in televised comments on Thursday, had served as a “rallying cry” to far-right extremists. Not only had the president refused to condemn white supremacists, he stood on the debate stage last week and told the Proud Boys, a violently racist gang, to “stand back and stand by”. When our leaders “stoke and contribute to hate speech, they are complicit”, Whitmer said.

It’s not just the White House that’s complicit, it’s the media. Kyle Rittenhouse, for example, the 17-year-old accused of killing two protesters in Wisconsin last month, was celebrated as a vigilante by rightwing outlets. “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” Tucker Carlson asked on Fox News. Far-right pundit Ann Coulter tweeted that she wanted the teenager “as my president”. The New York Post, meanwhile, published photos of Rittenhouse cleaning up graffiti; he was framed as a concerned citizen rather than a cold-blooded killer.

To be clear: double standards aren’t just a rightwing media problem. A study conducted by Georgia State University last year found that terror attacks carried out by Muslims receive on average 357% more media coverage than those committed by other groups. While this is clearly racist, it’s also dangerous. White supremacists, plenty of evidence shows, are the deadliest domestic threat facing the US. By downplaying the threat of white nationalist terrorism, by finding politer ways to refer to it, the media have allowed it to proliferate. So please, let’s call things by their name. Enough with the “militias”, these people are terrorists.

I'll inform Parliament and Crown.
 
I will if you acknowledge BLM, Antifa, BAMN, Pueblos sin Fronteras, the Brown Berets, Black Cross Federation, Red Brigades, John Brown Gun Club, Redneck Revolt, Rukus Society, and a plethora of other radical Leftist groups are domestic terrorists too.
 
LIBERATE DC......................


This week the FBI announced charges in a plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. Much of the coverage referred to them as a militia – and the governor wasn’t having it

The vocabulary of violence
Terrorists (noun): evil brown people.

Thugs (noun): violent black people.

Militia (noun): misunderstood white men. Groups of heavily armed individuals whose actions, while not exactly ideal, deserve compassion and should be looked at within a wider socioeconomic context. Instead of rushing to judgment or making generalisations, one must consider the complex causes (economic anxiety, video games, mental health issues) that have triggered these poor guys into committing mass murder, conspiring to violently overthrow the state or plotting to kidnap government officials.

I’m afraid to say that the misunderstood white men have struck again – or attempted to, at least. On Thursday 13 men were charged in relation to an alleged plot to kidnap Michigan’s Democratic governor, Gretchen Whitmer. The plan was to, “grab the bitch”, as they put it, and then try her for “treason”. The eventual goal being to create “a society that followed the US Bill of Rights and where they could be self-sufficient”.

Much of the media coverage of Whitmer’s would-be kidnappers referred to them as members of a Michigan militia group called Wolverine Watchmen. The wolverine, by the way, isn’t just a Marvel character – it’s an animal that looks like a small bear but is actually part of the weasel family. This seems appropriate because “militia” is very much a weasel word. It’s a way to avoid putting white extremists in the same bucket as brown people. It lends them legitimacy. It obfuscates what these people really are.

Governor Whitmer, to her immense credit, was having none of it. “They’re not ‘militias’,” she tweeted on Friday morning. “They’re domestic terrorists endangering and intimidating their fellow Americans. Words matter.”


Trump’s words, Whitmer said in televised comments on Thursday, had served as a “rallying cry” to far-right extremists. Not only had the president refused to condemn white supremacists, he stood on the debate stage last week and told the Proud Boys, a violently racist gang, to “stand back and stand by”. When our leaders “stoke and contribute to hate speech, they are complicit”, Whitmer said.

It’s not just the White House that’s complicit, it’s the media. Kyle Rittenhouse, for example, the 17-year-old accused of killing two protesters in Wisconsin last month, was celebrated as a vigilante by rightwing outlets. “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” Tucker Carlson asked on Fox News. Far-right pundit Ann Coulter tweeted that she wanted the teenager “as my president”. The New York Post, meanwhile, published photos of Rittenhouse cleaning up graffiti; he was framed as a concerned citizen rather than a cold-blooded killer.

To be clear: double standards aren’t just a rightwing media problem. A study conducted by Georgia State University last year found that terror attacks carried out by Muslims receive on average 357% more media coverage than those committed by other groups. While this is clearly racist, it’s also dangerous. White supremacists, plenty of evidence shows, are the deadliest domestic threat facing the US. By downplaying the threat of white nationalist terrorism, by finding politer ways to refer to it, the media have allowed it to proliferate. So please, let’s call things by their name. Enough with the “militias”, these people are terrorists.

Terrorist (noun) - a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Thug (noun) - a violent person, especially a criminal.

Those are the actual definitions of the two terms. Show me where color is in either one.
 
LIBERATE DC......................


This week the FBI announced charges in a plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. Much of the coverage referred to them as a militia – and the governor wasn’t having it

The vocabulary of violence
Terrorists (noun): evil brown people.

Thugs (noun): violent black people.

Militia (noun): misunderstood white men. Groups of heavily armed individuals whose actions, while not exactly ideal, deserve compassion and should be looked at within a wider socioeconomic context. Instead of rushing to judgment or making generalisations, one must consider the complex causes (economic anxiety, video games, mental health issues) that have triggered these poor guys into committing mass murder, conspiring to violently overthrow the state or plotting to kidnap government officials.

I’m afraid to say that the misunderstood white men have struck again – or attempted to, at least. On Thursday 13 men were charged in relation to an alleged plot to kidnap Michigan’s Democratic governor, Gretchen Whitmer. The plan was to, “grab the bitch”, as they put it, and then try her for “treason”. The eventual goal being to create “a society that followed the US Bill of Rights and where they could be self-sufficient”.

Much of the media coverage of Whitmer’s would-be kidnappers referred to them as members of a Michigan militia group called Wolverine Watchmen. The wolverine, by the way, isn’t just a Marvel character – it’s an animal that looks like a small bear but is actually part of the weasel family. This seems appropriate because “militia” is very much a weasel word. It’s a way to avoid putting white extremists in the same bucket as brown people. It lends them legitimacy. It obfuscates what these people really are.

Governor Whitmer, to her immense credit, was having none of it. “They’re not ‘militias’,” she tweeted on Friday morning. “They’re domestic terrorists endangering and intimidating their fellow Americans. Words matter.”


Trump’s words, Whitmer said in televised comments on Thursday, had served as a “rallying cry” to far-right extremists. Not only had the president refused to condemn white supremacists, he stood on the debate stage last week and told the Proud Boys, a violently racist gang, to “stand back and stand by”. When our leaders “stoke and contribute to hate speech, they are complicit”, Whitmer said.

It’s not just the White House that’s complicit, it’s the media. Kyle Rittenhouse, for example, the 17-year-old accused of killing two protesters in Wisconsin last month, was celebrated as a vigilante by rightwing outlets. “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?” Tucker Carlson asked on Fox News. Far-right pundit Ann Coulter tweeted that she wanted the teenager “as my president”. The New York Post, meanwhile, published photos of Rittenhouse cleaning up graffiti; he was framed as a concerned citizen rather than a cold-blooded killer.

To be clear: double standards aren’t just a rightwing media problem. A study conducted by Georgia State University last year found that terror attacks carried out by Muslims receive on average 357% more media coverage than those committed by other groups. While this is clearly racist, it’s also dangerous. White supremacists, plenty of evidence shows, are the deadliest domestic threat facing the US. By downplaying the threat of white nationalist terrorism, by finding politer ways to refer to it, the media have allowed it to proliferate. So please, let’s call things by their name. Enough with the “militias”, these people are terrorists.

BLM and Antifa
 
I will if you acknowledge BLM, Antifa, BAMN, Pueblos sin Fronteras, the Brown Berets, Black Cross Federation, Red Brigades, John Brown Gun Club, Redneck Revolt, Rukus Society, and a plethora of other radical Leftist groups are domestic terrorists too.

Not the same. They are not trying to overthrow the country. BLM is all about police brutality. If cops stop torturing minorities for sport, they will go home. Antifa is a tiny, teeny internet group that occasionally ahs a few people protest against Trump's fascism. I guess you guys are pro Fascism too.
 
Not the same. They are not trying to overthrow the country. BLM is all about police brutality. If cops stop torturing minorities for sport, they will go home. Antifa is a tiny, teeny internet group that occasionally ahs a few people protest against Trump's fascism. I guess you guys are pro Fascism too.

Yes they are. Your description of Antifa is laughably wrong as evidenced by photographs alone. In fact, describing them the way you did is either willful ignorance or an outright lie.

I stuck Pueblos sin Fronteras in there deliberately figuring you didn't know about them. They're a Communist front group that organized the "Caravans" of illegals a couple of years ago to flood the US border. Among their ranks is Alfredo Guerrero Ulloa, who is wanted in Honduras and the US for terrorist acts against US citizens and soldiers in Honduras.

This is a Brown Beret video


They are militant and want to establish the nation of Aztlan in the SW US and toss out all the non-Chicanos.

Every group I listed is violent, revolutionary, has more members than any of the radical Right militia groups, and is far more in your face about their goals.
 
Yes they are. Your description of Antifa is laughably wrong as evidenced by photographs alone. In fact, describing them the way you did is either willful ignorance or an outright lie.

I stuck Pueblos sin Fronteras in there deliberately figuring you didn't know about them. They're a Communist front group that organized the "Caravans" of illegals a couple of years ago to flood the US border. Among their ranks is Alfredo Guerrero Ulloa, who is wanted in Honduras and the US for terrorist acts against US citizens and soldiers in Honduras.

This is a Brown Beret video


They are militant and want to establish the nation of Aztlan in the SW US and toss out all the non-Chicanos.

Every group I listed is violent, revolutionary, has more members than any of the radical Right militia groups, and is far more in your face about their goals.
Looks to me like any and every group of any kind that doesn't tow the right wing agenda becomes a communist front group. Are you still living in the 50's? Do you kiss a picture of Joe McCarthy every night.
 
White christian terrorists

2yk93p.jpg



foxnews-mn-terror.jpg



90
 
I would only call them terrorists if they engage in or plan terrorist activities.

But they don't have to go that far to be in violation of the law:

"A private militia engages in law enforcement activities without authorization by state or federal officials. Their members are often armed and wearing uniforms or identifying insignias, and they often believe they have legal authority to protect property or control crowds.

But no private militia has that authority. Every state bans unauthorized militias from taking on the activities of law enforcement."

It’s illegal in all 50 states to engage in militia activity.
 
Simply call them what they are: tRump worshipping fanatics. Call the fanatics what they are: Racists, bigots and idiot rednecks.
 
Not the same. They are not trying to overthrow the country. BLM is all about police brutality. If cops stop torturing minorities for sport, they will go home. Antifa is a tiny, teeny internet group that occasionally ahs a few people protest against Trump's fascism. I guess you guys are pro Fascism too.

BLM and Antifa go for more of an incremental approach -- take one city at a time. Admittedly, it does seem to be more effective as a tactic. Of course, it helps when the media covers for you.
 
I would only call them terrorists if they engage in or plan terrorist activities.

But they don't have to go that far to be in violation of the law:

"A private militia engages in law enforcement activities without authorization by state or federal officials. Their members are often armed and wearing uniforms or identifying insignias, and they often believe they have legal authority to protect property or control crowds.

But no private militia has that authority. Every state bans unauthorized militias from taking on the activities of law enforcement."

It’s illegal in all 50 states to engage in militia activity.

Voter intimidation, eh? You mean like when the Black Panthers intimidated voters in Philly in 2012?
 
Looks to me like any and every group of any kind that doesn't tow the right wing agenda becomes a communist front group. Are you still living in the 50's? Do you kiss a picture of Joe McCarthy every night.

Seems you are in denial too.

Ulloa has lived in Mexico since 1987 after fleeing Honduras in the wake of a bombing that wounded six soldiers. Ulloa was suspected of planting a bomb in a Chinese restaurant, but received asylum from Mexico, whose government described the suspected terrorist as a “freedom fighter.”
https://iotwreport.com/suspected-te...eading-migrant-group-demanding-entry-into-us/

A suspect in a 1987 bombing that wounded six American soldiers in Honduras is leading a group of migrants demanding entry into the United States.

Alfonso Guerrero Ulloa organized a march of approximately 100 migrants to the U.S. Consulate in Tijuana, Mexico, on Tuesday, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported. Ulloa delivered a letter to the consulate on behalf of the migrants, asking for either entry into the U.S. or a payment of $50,000 per person.
https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/12/honduras-migrant-bombing-suspect/

Brown Berets being every bit the equivalent of Neo-Nazis and the KKK


I can admit the radical Right has violent, racist, haters, and nutjobs on it. It's you that has the problem. You can't bring yourself to admit the radical Left is every bit as racist, hateful, violent, and crazy as the radical Right. I can.
 
Terrorist (noun) - a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

Thug (noun) - a violent person, especially a criminal.

Those are the actual definitions of the two terms. Show me where color is in either one.

Stop asking stupid questions.

Go measure your buddies pants again...............
 
Back
Top