Even MORE Evidence of a Stolen 2020 "Election"

gfm7175

Mega MAGA
I made this post in another thread earlier this morning, but I feel that it is important enough that it deserves its own thread. Here is the post in its entirety, inspired by @Uncensored2008 's comparison of the last few (s)elections that this nation has had:

Oh yes, that's the very first thing that I noticed and even purposely looked for.

To be fair to Harris though, her final tally will likely creep up to juuuust above the 70 million mark (as California has lots of ballots to be counted yet, and etc) ... However, Trump also has millions of ballots to be counted yet.

In the end, Harris will likely beat Obama's 2008 number, but not by much, which is NOT AT ALL an accomplishment for Harris because the nation's population (and number of registered voters) has increased so much since 2008. IOW, she would, in the present-day, need roughly 77 million "votes" in order to have a performance comparable to Obama's in 2008, which is what leftists tried to get us to believe (and THEN some) with Joe Biden in 2020.

But yes, your point rings VERY true... Biden didn't actually have anywhere near 81 million people vote for him. It just plain DIDN'T happen. It was the result of a bunch of fraudulent ballots being put into the system and then subsequently counted (all illegally). What you've presented here is YET ANOTHER data point that serves as EVEN MORE evidence that massive election fraud occurred in 2020.

81 million votes is simply unheard of... Even 70 million votes would've been mind-blowing, which is why Trump's 74 million LEGAL and ACTUAL votes in 2020 WAS truly mind-blowing. Trump will get even higher than that this time around when all is said and done, which is even MORE mind-blowing.

Now, let me add the Republican numbers into the mix as well...

2008: 69.5 million (Nobama), 59.9 million (McStain)
2012: 65.9 million (Nobama), 60.9 million (RINO Romney)
2016: 65.8 million (Killary), 62.9 million (Trump)
2020: 81.2 million?? WTF??? (Bribem), 74.2 million (Trump)
2024: ONLY 66.9 million so far?? (Kamabla), 71.8 million so far (Trump)

2008: 129.4 million total votes
2012: 126.8 million total votes
2016: 128.7 million total votes
2020: 155.4 million total "votes"
2024: 138.7 million total votes (so far, might end up around 145 million)

So, assuming 2024 will end with around 145 million votes in total when all the counting is said and done, WHERE ARE THE ADDITIONAL 10 MILLION "MISSING VOTES" FROM THE 2020 CYCLE?!?!?!?!?!

Almost everyone keeps saying "low turnout, low turnout, low turnout", but me thinks NOT... me thinks that those "10 million voters" NEVER. ACTUALLY. EXISTED. TO. BEGIN. WITH. --- Those are the fraudulent ballots that were illegally inserted into the system that stole 2020 away from Donald Trump.

If one believes the "lower turnout" psyop, then why didn't Democrats show up in 2024 like they "showed up" in 2020? Given how "vital" 2024 was to "saving Democracy" and "stopping Hitler reincarnated", I'm supposed to somehow believe that Republicans (when all votes are counted) INCREASED their turnout from 2020 yet Democrats somehow SEVERELY DECREASED their turnout from 2020??

"C'mon man!"
 
I made this post in another thread earlier this morning, but I feel that it is important enough that it deserves its own thread. Here is the post in its entirety, inspired by Uncensored2008's comparison of the last few (s)elections that this nation has had:

Oh yes, that's the very first thing that I noticed and even purposely looked for.

To be fair to Harris though, her final tally will likely creep up to juuuust above the 70 million mark (as California has lots of ballots to be counted yet, and etc) ... However, Trump also has millions of ballots to be counted yet.

In the end, Harris will likely beat Obama's 2008 number, but not by much, which is NOT AT ALL an accomplishment for Harris because the nation's population (and number of registered voters) has increased so much since 2008. IOW, she would, in the present-day, need roughly 77 million "votes" in order to have a performance comparable to Obama's in 2008, which is what leftists tried to get us to believe (and THEN some) with Joe Biden in 2020.

But yes, your point rings VERY true... Biden didn't actually have anywhere near 81 million people vote for him. It just plain DIDN'T happen. It was the result of a bunch of fraudulent ballots being put into the system and then subsequently counted (all illegally). What you've presented here is YET ANOTHER data point that serves as EVEN MORE evidence that massive election fraud occurred in 2020.

81 million votes is simply unheard of... Even 70 million votes would've been mind-blowing, which is why Trump's 74 million LEGAL and ACTUAL votes in 2020 WAS truly mind-blowing. Trump will get even higher than that this time around when all is said and done, which is even MORE mind-blowing.

Now, let me add the Republican numbers into the mix as well...

2008: 69.5 million (Nobama), 59.9 million (McStain)
2012: 65.9 million (Nobama), 60.9 million (RINO Romney)
2016: 65.8 million (Killary), 62.9 million (Trump)
2020: 81.2 million?? WTF??? (Bribem), 74.2 million (Trump)
2024: ONLY 66.9 million so far?? (Kamabla), 71.8 million so far (Trump)

2008: 129.4 million total votes
2012: 126.8 million total votes
2016: 128.7 million total votes
2020: 155.4 million total "votes"
2024: 138.7 million total votes (so far, might end up around 145 million)

So, assuming 2024 will end with around 145 million votes in total when all the counting is said and done, WHERE ARE THE ADDITIONAL 10 MILLION "MISSING VOTES" FROM THE 2020 CYCLE?!?!?!?!?!

Almost everyone keeps saying "low turnout, low turnout, low turnout", but me thinks NOT... me thinks that those "10 million voters" NEVER. ACTUALLY. EXISTED. TO. BEGIN. WITH. --- Those are the fraudulent ballots that were illegally inserted into the system that stole 2020 away from Donald Trump.

If one believes the "lower turnout" psyop, then why didn't Democrats show up in 2024 like they "showed up" in 2020? Given how "vital" 2024 was to "saving Democracy" and "stopping Hitler reincarnated", I'm supposed to somehow believe that Republicans (when all votes are counted) INCREASED their turnout from 2020 yet Democrats somehow SEVERELY DECREASED their turnout from 2020??

"C'mon man!"
You make a great case. I was going to do a similar analysis but as I wait for the final vote tally, I'll just add onto yours. :thumbsup:
 
You make a great case. I was going to do a similar analysis but as I wait for the final vote tally, I'll just add onto yours. :thumbsup:
Sounds good. This thread is definitely the place for it!

I also want to do (or if someone else does it that would be great too) similar analysis but at the state level for various states (both swing and non-swing).

I definitely want to gather more granular details on this issue, but the nationwide numbers that I've presented are a good start.

Of course, final 2024 tallies will take weeks to come in (thanks to Democrats and their dishonest ways), but it will be interesting to compare the results of various states from the past few (s)elections to see how the officially reported results differ from each other.
 
Okay, so now I'm going to start dabbling a little bit into state-level results from the last three (s)election cycles to begin the process of figuring out which states "lost Democrat votes" from 2020. For now, I'll only be looking at some states that are (essentially) done reporting their numbers (so I'm holding off on California, Arizona, etc...) ...

Of course, it's obvious that the "extra votes" from 2020 never actually existed to begin with and were instead fraudulent ballots that were inserted into the system to be counted as "votes", and that process was much easier under "COVID rules" and the fact that there weren't a million eyeballs actively looking for election fraud.

Given that truth, I'll ask this question in a less-accurate "reverse" sort of manner... Where did these (I'm estimating it to be) 10 million "voters" (ballots) disappear from? If Kamala Harris ends up with 10 million LESS "votes" (ballots) than Joe Biden, then how many "votes" (ballots) did each state lose in order to get to the final difference number (est. 10 million)?

Well, it WASN'T in my state of Wisconsin... Harris supposedly BEAT Joe Biden's fraudulent numbers here (it appears that there were shenanigans in Milwaukee yet AGAIN, which saved career-politician Tammy Baldwin's senate seat even if that cheat wasn't enough to overcome Trump's gains from 2020, but I digress).

WISCONSIN (2016, 2020, 2024) ---
2016: 1,405,284 (Trump), 1,382,536 (Killary), 106,674 (Johnson)
2020: 1,610,184 (Trump), 1,630,866 (Bribem)
2024: 1,697,679 (Trump), 1,668,045 (Kamabla) (99% in)

2016: 2,894,494 "votes" / ballots
2020: 3,241,050 "votes" / ballots
2024: 3,365,724 "votes" / ballots

So Wisconsin ends up being roughly +37,179 for Kamambla compared against Bribem.
 
MICHIGAN (2016, 2020, 2024) ---
2016: 2,279,543 (Trump), 2,268,839 (Killary), 172,136 (Johnson)
2020: 2,649,852 (Trump), 2,804,040 (Bribem)
2024: 2,796,037 (Trump), 2,713,934 (Kamabla) (99% in)

2016: 4,270,518 "votes" / ballots
2020: 5,453,892 "votes" / ballots
2024: 5,509,971 "votes" / ballots

So Michigan ends up being roughly -90,106 for Kamambla compared against Bribem.

Michigan is similar to Wisconsin in that they successfully stole the senate seat away from the Republican candidate, but they didn't have enough ballots in order to steal the election away from Trump.
 
IOWA (2016, 2020, 2024) ---
2016: 800,983 (Trump), 653,669 (Killary), 59,186 (Johnson)
2020: 897,672 (Trump), 759,061 (Bribem)
2024: 924,143 (Trump), 705,310 (Kamabla) (99% in)

2016: 1,513,838"votes" / ballots
2020: 1,656,733 "votes" / ballots
2024: 1,629,453 "votes" / ballots

So Iowa ends up being roughly -53,751 for Kamambla compared against Bribem.

Here, there was no down-ballot senate seat to steal. This is also the first state so far to have less 2024 ballots than 2020 ballots, but Trump still has the same vote-gain pattern as he does in the other states (while Kamabla somehow dropped from Bribem in IA and MI but not in WI).
 
MINNESOTA (2016, 2020, 2024) ---
2016: 1,323,232 (Trump), 1,367,825 (Killary), 112,984 (Johnson)
2020: 1,484,065 (Trump), 1,717,077 (Bribem)
2024: 1,516,342 (Trump), 1,653,744 (Kamabla) (99% in)

2016: 2,804,041 "votes" / ballots
2020: 3,201,142 "votes" / ballots
2024: 3,170,086 "votes" / ballots

So Minnesota ends up being roughly -63,333 for Kamambla compared against Bribem.

Once again, Trump's vote-pattern stays consistent. There was no down-ballot senate race to steal here, and MN numbers seem similar to IA numbers.

Yet, Wisconsin results are still an outlier compared to the others... Kamabla apparently got MORE votes in WISCONSIN than she did in Minnesota.... hmmmmmm..... and Killary doing it in 2016 was under different circumstances because MN had a very sizeable chunk of people who voted for other candidates in 2016, which didn't happen in 2024 (and WI didn't vote in that manner in 2016 like MN did). So it's odd that Kamabla outperformed Biden in WI and that Kamabla got more votes in WI than she did in MN, even though MN has a similar sized but more liberal population.
 
OHIO (2016, 2020, 2024) ---
2016: 2,841,005 (Trump), 2,394,164 (Killary), 174,498 (Johnson)
2020: 3,154,834 (Trump), 2,679,165 (Bribem)
2024: 3,116,579 (Trump), 2,476,003 (Kamabla) (99% in)

2016: 5,409,667 "votes" / ballots
2020: 5,833,999 "votes" / ballots
2024: 5,592,582 "votes" / ballots

So Ohio ends up being roughly -203,162 for Kamambla compared against Bribem.

These results are interesting in that Ohio is a state that didn't have as massive of an increase for Trump in 2020 compared to 2016. They are also the first state to see Trump have an ever so slightly SMALLER number of votes in 2024 than he got in 2020.

They are also the first state to not have such a massive spike in "turnout" (ballots) from 2016 to 2020 (only 7.84% compared to 14.16% in MN, 9.44% in IA, 15.54% in MI, 11.97% in WI).

NOTE: My 2016 number of ballots for Michigan is transposed... It should be 4,720,518, NOT 4,270,518.
 
PENNSYLVANIA (2016, 2020, 2024) ---
2016: 2,970,733 (Trump), 2,926,441 (Killary), 146,715 (Johnson)
2020: 3,377,674 (Trump), 3,458,229 (Bribem)
2024: 3,475,209 (Trump), 3,341,989 (Kamabla) (99% in)

2016: 6,043,889 "votes" / ballots
2020: 6,835,903 "votes" / ballots
2024: 6,817,198 "votes" / ballots

So Pennsylvania ends up being roughly -116,240 for Kamambla compared against Bribem. This continues the same general Trump vote-pattern over the years.

Wisconsin is STILL the ONLY state to see Kamabla "outperform Biden's numbers"......
 
So let me get this straight: 2020 was a STOLEN election but 2024 was a PERFECT election.

Yet no one "fixed" anything between 2020 and 2024. No new ID laws, no elimination of mail-in voting, still used voting machines, nothing new.

So what changed?

(Don't answer that...I know what changed. Your guy won. That's literally all that is different. Do you see how that might look like how a toddler plays the game?)
 
So let me get this straight: 2020 was a STOLEN election but 2024 was a PERFECT election.

Apparently, you're only capable of getting everything wrong.

Yet no one "fixed" anything between 2020 and 2024. No new ID laws, no elimination of mail-in voting, still used voting machines, nothing new.

There have been massive changes, particularly in the battleground states. Not to mention that jurists have not overturned their legislatures like they did illegally in 2020.

Have you been sleeping or drugged out the last four years?

30+ states have made these voting changes since the 2020 election


So what changed?

See above.

(Don't answer that...I know what changed. Your guy won. That's literally all that is different. Do you see how that might look like how a toddler plays the game?)

You give new meaning to the term "stupid." But alas, stupid people like you don't even know they are stupid. :palm:
 
No "ballot dumps" at 2 am this time. Why the one-time occurrence?
Here in Wisconsin, Milwaukee simply went back to their tried and true playbook of "whoops, there's a tabulator issue so we can't get __,000 absentee ballots counted until the wee hours of the next morning". The next morning then arrives and Trump's margin drops a couple of points and Hovde's margin likewise drops a couple of points, juuuuuuust enough to cost Hovde the senate seat against career-politician Baldwin. Hmmmmmmm.......

That's similar to how they got Walker out of the Governor's seat back in 2018.
 
Apparently, you're only capable of getting everything wrong.



There have been massive changes, particularly in the battleground states. Not to mention that jurists have not overturned their legislatures like they did illegally in 2020.

Have you been sleeping or drugged out the last four years?

30+ states have made these voting changes since the 2020 election




See above.



You give new meaning to the term "stupid." But alas, stupid people like you don't even know they are stupid. :palm:

I'm not as easily led as you are and I don't have a vested interest in forgetting what you guys claimed at the OUTSET of this election. Days before voting began YOU GUYS claimed the rigging was ONGOING. That it was starting.

But now you are silent on it. That's all I need to know.
 
I made this post in another thread earlier this morning, but I feel that it is important enough that it deserves its own thread. Here is the post in its entirety, inspired by @Uncensored2008 's comparison of the last few (s)elections that this nation has had:

Oh yes, that's the very first thing that I noticed and even purposely looked for.

To be fair to Harris though, her final tally will likely creep up to juuuust above the 70 million mark (as California has lots of ballots to be counted yet, and etc) ... However, Trump also has millions of ballots to be counted yet.

In the end, Harris will likely beat Obama's 2008 number, but not by much, which is NOT AT ALL an accomplishment for Harris because the nation's population (and number of registered voters) has increased so much since 2008. IOW, she would, in the present-day, need roughly 77 million "votes" in order to have a performance comparable to Obama's in 2008, which is what leftists tried to get us to believe (and THEN some) with Joe Biden in 2020.

But yes, your point rings VERY true... Biden didn't actually have anywhere near 81 million people vote for him. It just plain DIDN'T happen. It was the result of a bunch of fraudulent ballots being put into the system and then subsequently counted (all illegally). What you've presented here is YET ANOTHER data point that serves as EVEN MORE evidence that massive election fraud occurred in 2020.

81 million votes is simply unheard of... Even 70 million votes would've been mind-blowing, which is why Trump's 74 million LEGAL and ACTUAL votes in 2020 WAS truly mind-blowing. Trump will get even higher than that this time around when all is said and done, which is even MORE mind-blowing.

Now, let me add the Republican numbers into the mix as well...

2008: 69.5 million (Nobama), 59.9 million (McStain)
2012: 65.9 million (Nobama), 60.9 million (RINO Romney)
2016: 65.8 million (Killary), 62.9 million (Trump)
2020: 81.2 million?? WTF??? (Bribem), 74.2 million (Trump)
2024: ONLY 66.9 million so far?? (Kamabla), 71.8 million so far (Trump)

2008: 129.4 million total votes
2012: 126.8 million total votes
2016: 128.7 million total votes
2020: 155.4 million total "votes"
2024: 138.7 million total votes (so far, might end up around 145 million)

So, assuming 2024 will end with around 145 million votes in total when all the counting is said and done, WHERE ARE THE ADDITIONAL 10 MILLION "MISSING VOTES" FROM THE 2020 CYCLE?!?!?!?!?!

Almost everyone keeps saying "low turnout, low turnout, low turnout", but me thinks NOT... me thinks that those "10 million voters" NEVER. ACTUALLY. EXISTED. TO. BEGIN. WITH. --- Those are the fraudulent ballots that were illegally inserted into the system that stole 2020 away from Donald Trump.

If one believes the "lower turnout" psyop, then why didn't Democrats show up in 2024 like they "showed up" in 2020? Given how "vital" 2024 was to "saving Democracy" and "stopping Hitler reincarnated", I'm supposed to somehow believe that Republicans (when all votes are counted) INCREASED their turnout from 2020 yet Democrats somehow SEVERELY DECREASED their turnout from 2020??

"C'mon man!"
Bullseye.
 
Another observation that I've made while going through numbers so far (there's A LOT more states to go through though)

Wisconsin and Michigan are the only two states thus far which have counted MORE ballots in 2024 than in 2020, with Pennsylvania's 2024 ballots being very close to 2020's ballots (juuuust under). Other states so far haven't been as close as those three in 2024 ballots as 2020 ballots.
 
Annnnnnnnd now the stupid libtards with the stupid libtard takes on the matter are finally waking up to begin their day..........
So let me get this straight:
These are the precise words that a liberal says the very moment before he is about to utter something completely outlandish and stupid, putting his inability to read, comprehend, and think on full display.
2020 was a STOLEN election
Yes.
but 2024 was a PERFECT election.
No.
Yet no one "fixed" anything between 2020 and 2024.
SOME fixes were implemented, which thwarted SOME election fraud.
No new ID laws, no elimination of mail-in voting, still used voting machines, nothing new.

So what changed?
Some election laws... Some court cases that went the R's way... Having MANY more eyes/ears watching/listening and fully honed in on any leftist election fraud efforts.... Some "boots on the ground" which stopped smaller fraud issues before they became much larger fraud issues (such as some localized ballot printing issues which led to tabulator issues due to differences between ballots). Things like that.
(Don't answer that...I know what changed. Your guy won. That's literally all that is different. Do you see how that might look like how a toddler plays the game?)
Incorrect. See above.
 
Apparently, you're only capable of getting everything wrong.



There have been massive changes, particularly in the battleground states. Not to mention that jurists have not overturned their legislatures like they did illegally in 2020.

Have you been sleeping or drugged out the last four years?

30+ states have made these voting changes since the 2020 election




See above.



You give new meaning to the term "stupid." But alas, stupid people like you don't even know they are stupid. :palm:
you schooled his dumb ass real good.
 
I'm not as easily led as you are
LIE. You're led around by a dangling carrot by the manipulative mainstream media. You believe whatever your mind masters PROGRAM you to believe.
:npc:
and I don't have a vested interest in forgetting what you guys claimed at the OUTSET of this election. Days before voting began YOU GUYS claimed the rigging was ONGOING. That it was starting.
The rigging IS ongoing.... it hasn't stopped. It's been VERY noticeable since 2018 and has continued to this very day.
But now you are silent on it. That's all I need to know.
Silent on it?? You're literally posting within a thread of mine that is being anything BUT silent about it........... I'm HIGHLIGHTING it... I'm sounding the alarm on it... I'm not shutting up about it.

"Silent on it"...... :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2:

And this is even AFTER "my guy" WON.............. So it has nothing to do with "my guy" either..........
 
Back
Top