Facts no leftist can refute

After the 2000 election, which hinged on the results of a recount in Florida, DEMOCRATS smeared George W. Bush as “selected, not elected.”

When Bush won re-election against then-Sen. John Kerry in 2004, many on the left claimed that voting machines in Ohio had been rigged to deliver fraudulent votes to Bush. HBO even produced and aired “Hacking Democracy,” a documentary that added fuel to the conspiracy theory fire.

But nothing holds a candle to what happened in 2016 after Donald Trump’s surprising defeat of Hillary Clinton.

Rather than accept that Trump won and Clinton lost, the political and media establishments desperately sought to explain away Trump’s victory.

What they settled on was a destructive conspiracy theory that crippled the government, empowered America’s adversaries, and illegally targeted innocent private citizens whose only crime was not supporting Hillary.

With baseless claims of hacked voting totals, illegal voter suppression, and extensive media manipulation, the Russian collusion hoax had it all.

But more than anything, the belief that Trump stole the 2016 election had the support of the most powerful institutions, individuals, and even government agencies in the country.

“You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you,” Clinton told her followers in 2019.

“I know he’s an illegitimate president,” Clinton claimed of Trump a few months later. She even claimed during an interview with “CBS Sunday Morning” that “voter suppression and voter purging and hacking” were why she lost.

Former President Jimmy Carter agreed.

“He lost the election and was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf,” he told NPR in 2019. “Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016.”

Their view was widely shared by most prominent DEMOCRATS in Congress. Rep. John Lewis of Georgia, for example, said he was skipping Trump’s inauguration in 2016 because he believed Trump was illegitimate, and that “the Russians participated in helping this man get elected.” Lewis also skipped the inauguration of George W. Bush, claiming that Bush, too, was an illegitimate president.

In 2017, one out of every three DEMOCRATS in the U.S. House boycotted Trump’s inauguration. Many said they refused to take part in the installation of an illegitimate president.

Not only did corporate media not condemn leading DEMOCRATS’ refusal to accept the results of the election, the media were also super spreaders of wild conspiracy theories about how Trump and Russia colluded to steal the election from Clinton.

They dutifully regurgitated false leaks from corrupt intelligence officials suggesting that Trump and his staff had committed treason.

They ran stories suggesting that anyone who didn’t support their conspiracy theory was insufficiently loyal to the country.

Some even suggested Russia may have hacked voting machines and vote totals in a bid to steal the election from Clinton.

It was all nonsense. Even Robert Mueller, who ran a multi-year and multi-million-dollar government investigation into claims that Trump personally colluded with Russian President Vladimir Putin to steal the election from Clinton, found there was no evidence to support the claim.

Rather than being shunned by their peers for peddling leaks and lies that had no basis in reality, the reporters who pushed this conspiracy theory were lauded by their peers, received raises and promotions, and were given Pulitzers for “reporting” that turned out to be detached from reality.

From 2016 through 2020, the easiest way to achieve stardom on the political left was to loudly proclaim your belief that 2016 was an illegitimate election stolen by the Russians on behalf of a corrupt traitor.

Dissent, up to and including the assertion that the President of the United States was a secret Russian spy, was the highest form of patriotism.


https://thefederalist.com/2021/05/11/mollie-hemingway-is-writing-the-2020-election-book-the-media-dont-want-you-to-read/
 
And then 2020 happened.

With the snap of their fingers, America’s electoral system went from irredeemably corrupt and broken in 2016 to unquestionably safe in 2020.

Voting methods that were allegedly used to steal elections in 2004 and 2016 suddenly became sacrosanct and impenetrable in 2020.

Whereas so-called election experts repeatedly warned pre-2020 about the pitfalls of electronic voting and widespread mail-in balloting, by November of 2020, any discussion about the vulnerabilities of those methods was declared to be verboten.
 
If concerns about election integrity were valid in 2000, and 2004, and 2008, and 2012, and 2016, then surely those concerns were valid in 2020, an election unlike any other in American history.
 
Across the country at the state, local, and federal level, hundreds of significant structural changes to the manner and oversight of elections were instituted, resulting in what Time Magazine called a “a revolution in how people vote.”

Some of these changes were enacted by state legislatures, some by courts, and others by county and state election officials.

Many changes were allegedly justified by the global pandemic, although DEMOCRATS had long advocated for them and now seek to make them permanent.
 
The bedrock of the American republic is that elections must be free, fair, and trusted.

Fraud is almost impossible to find after the fact, and to fight it, strong rules and regulations are needed on the front end.

That’s why DEMOCRATS fight to relax the rules and regulations that govern the process.
 
What happened during the 2020 election deserves to be investigated and discussed.

It must be investigated and discussed, not in spite of media and political opposition to it, but because of that opposition.
 
If concerns about election integrity were valid in 2000, and 2004, and 2008, and 2012, and 2016, then surely those concerns were valid in 2020, an election unlike any other in American history.

Do you think the 2000, 2004, 2012, and 2016 election concerns were valid and should have been investigated?
 
Is it really?

I reject your f.u.d.

Fear, uncertainty, and doubt - Wikipedia
Search domain en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt
Fear, uncertainty, and doubt (often shortened to FUD) is a propaganda tactic used in sales, marketing, public relations, politics, polling and cults. FUD is generally a strategy to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information and a manifestation of the appeal to fear.
 
I reject your f.u.d.

Fear, uncertainty, and doubt - Wikipedia
Search domain en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt
Fear, uncertainty, and doubt (often shortened to FUD) is a propaganda tactic used in sales, marketing, public relations, politics, polling and cults. FUD is generally a strategy to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information and a manifestation of the appeal to fear.

OK, then.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ecome-the-norm-if-DEMOCRATS-are-to-be-deposed
 
Back
Top