FBI Faked Crime Drop by Leaving Out 1,699 Murders

volsrock1

Verified User
Democrats and their media have been hyping false claims that crime is down. Biden claimed that crime was at a 50-year low. I’ve dissected some of these false claims in the past, but a key point in the debate was that some of the FBI crime data was missing because the way data was reported had changed.

Now the full crime data for 2022 is in and it turns out that the FBI had missed 1,699 murders. But what’s over a thousand dead folks when the goal is to fake a crime drop?



 
Democrats and their media have been hyping false claims that crime is down. Biden claimed that crime was at a 50-year low. I’ve dissected some of these false claims in the past, but a key point in the debate was that some of the FBI crime data was missing because the way data was reported had changed.

Now the full crime data for 2022 is in and it turns out that the FBI had missed 1,699 murders. But what’s over a thousand dead folks when the goal is to fake a crime drop?




461179392-977755381032051-7054455845554435960-n-2.png
 
"They"?

Who are "they"?

The FBI?

I'm pretty sure "they" don't deal in job numbers and inflation, dumbass.



Oh puh - lease.

You do not even want to go there, sonny....




:palm:
oooh - the 51 deep state swamp shit stain ploy again.

JFC - you cockroaches never change. how many of those people also lied about Hunter's laptop?

turn on the lights - you scurry off. only to come back with more rot later
 
Democrats and their media have been hyping false claims that crime is down. Biden claimed that crime was at a 50-year low. I’ve dissected some of these false claims in the past, but a key point in the debate was that some of the FBI crime data was missing because the way data was reported had changed.

Now the full crime data for 2022 is in and it turns out that the FBI had missed 1,699 murders. But what’s over a thousand dead folks when the goal is to fake a crime drop?



This has to be the sixth if not more thread started on the same topic, which s really comical because if they read the actual report, and not have to wait for some talking head to frame his opinion, they’d know that the primary source even stated that the figures only accounts for 70% of reporting entities at that time.

And the interesting part is that even though it only covers 70% it included all major metropolitan areas, the supposed “shitholes, specifying that the rural district take longer to report
 
Back
Top