First mission to Mars should be all female

Cypress

Will work for Scooby snacks
The first crewed mission to Mars should be all female, here's why

NASA scientist Geoffrey Landis reiterated the argument in 2000, applying it more strictly to deep-space flight, where the only resources available are the ones you take with you.

“Women are on average smaller than males: women use less oxygen, consume less consumables, produce less carbon dioxide. They have lower mass and take up less volume. The argument for an all-female crew is simple: such a crew would require considerably less support… and allow a smaller spacecraft. This would produce a considerable savings in cost,” he wrote

A recently published study put some concrete numbers behind Landis’ contentions. Scientists with the Space Medicine Team at the European Space Agency calculated that the average female astronaut requires 26% fewer calories, 29% less oxygen, and 18% less water than the average male. This translates to some sizeable resource savings. A 1,080-day space mission crewed by four women would need 1,695 fewer kilograms of food compared to an all-male mission. That’s about 10% of a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket’s payload to Mars — valuable space which could be filled with additional scientific projects and equipment to ensure a safe and successful mission.


https://bigthink.com/hard-science/female-space-missions/
 
is there aa particular reason that anybody might want to go to Mars?

What have they got that we might like?

Great restaurants?
Luxury hotels?
Beautiful golf courses?
Young Asian girls that like old Caucasian men?
 
is there aa particular reason that anybody might want to go to Mars?

What have they got that we might like?

Great restaurants?
Luxury hotels?
Beautiful golf courses?
Young Asian girls that like old Caucasian men?

Exploration
 
If we are going to mars and have to use all women because of technical reasons then we aren’t ready to go.

We need to have technology good enough where things like body size doesn’t matter

And there is no reason to go to mars other then testing our ability to go further out than the moon so there is no rush
 
is there aa particular reason that anybody might want to go to Mars?

What have they got that we might like?

Great restaurants?
Luxury hotels?
Beautiful golf courses?
Young Asian girls that like old Caucasian men?

To push the boundaries of what is possible and enrich the human experience.
 
The first crewed mission to Mars should be all female, here's why

NASA scientist Geoffrey Landis reiterated the argument in 2000, applying it more strictly to deep-space flight, where the only resources available are the ones you take with you.

“Women are on average smaller than males: women use less oxygen, consume less consumables, produce less carbon dioxide. They have lower mass and take up less volume. The argument for an all-female crew is simple: such a crew would require considerably less support… and allow a smaller spacecraft. This would produce a considerable savings in cost,” he wrote

A recently published study put some concrete numbers behind Landis’ contentions. Scientists with the Space Medicine Team at the European Space Agency calculated that the average female astronaut requires 26% fewer calories, 29% less oxygen, and 18% less water than the average male. This translates to some sizeable resource savings. A 1,080-day space mission crewed by four women would need 1,695 fewer kilograms of food compared to an all-male mission. That’s about 10% of a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket’s payload to Mars — valuable space which could be filled with additional scientific projects and equipment to ensure a safe and successful mission.


https://bigthink.com/hard-science/female-space-missions/

Females or male jockeys. :thup:
 
The first crewed mission to Mars should be all female, here's why

NASA scientist Geoffrey Landis reiterated the argument in 2000, applying it more strictly to deep-space flight, where the only resources available are the ones you take with you.

“Women are on average smaller than males: women use less oxygen, consume less consumables, produce less carbon dioxide. They have lower mass and take up less volume. The argument for an all-female crew is simple: such a crew would require considerably less support… and allow a smaller spacecraft. This would produce a considerable savings in cost,” he wrote

A recently published study put some concrete numbers behind Landis’ contentions. Scientists with the Space Medicine Team at the European Space Agency calculated that the average female astronaut requires 26% fewer calories, 29% less oxygen, and 18% less water than the average male. This translates to some sizeable resource savings. A 1,080-day space mission crewed by four women would need 1,695 fewer kilograms of food compared to an all-male mission. That’s about 10% of a SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket’s payload to Mars — valuable space which could be filled with additional scientific projects and equipment to ensure a safe and successful mission.


https://bigthink.com/hard-science/female-space-missions/

Crew should be all black females.
 
I don't whether or not the science shows a 5'3" man has the same caloric needs as a 5'3" female. But maybe so!

Men typically have a higher caloric burn than women due to higher muscle mass. Muscle burns calories, fat doesn't.
 
A correction of historical institutional racism and misogyny in the space program.
At least send an all female black crew to the moon to make up for those three white guys that went first.

You sound like a woke fanatic. What would Puddin' Hands think?
 
Back
Top