First snap polls of VP debate show a virtual draw

C

Cypress

Well-known member

First Flash Polls on Vance-Walz Debate Clash Revealed​


Snap polls following Tuesday’s vice presidential debate show voters think Ohio Sen. JD Vance and his Democratic opponent, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, ended their verbal jousting in a virtual draw.

A flash poll by CBS News and YouGov, released shortly after the debate aired, saw 42 percent of likely voters giving a win to Vance and 41 percent to Walz, while 17 percent judged it a tie.

A CNN poll of registered voters who watched the debate, conducted by SSRS produced a similar result: 51 percent said they thought Vance performed better and 49 percent gave the nod to Walz.

Likely voters were also split 50/50 in a Politico/Focaldata snap poll. However, the Politico poll showed Walz with a sixteen point lead among independent voters: 58 percent said the Minnesota governor won the debate versus 42 percent who sided with Vance.

One poll broke with the pack: a Daily Mail/J.L Partners survey of likely voters found that 50 percent said Vance won compared to 43 percent who said Walz came out ahead.

Per CBS News and YouGov, Walz scored a higher rating for sounding “reasonable” during the debate in comparison to Vance’s 65 percent, though Vance walked out of the debate with a more favorable view than what people had of him before his appearance. Vance’s favorability rating improved from 40 percent to 49 percent while Walz’ favorability rose from 52 percent to 60 percent.

www.thedailybeast.com

First Flash Polls’ Shock Verdict on Vance-Walz Clash Revealed

The results are in on who outshone the other at Tuesday night’s debate.
www.thedailybeast.com
 
Last edited:
The right was so desperate for a win after Trump/Harris that they have been jubilant and calling it a landslide. I'd concede Vance won, but Walz did fine overall. Vance was smoother, Walz made more incisive points on several issues.

It not a draw, then pretty close to it.
 
BartenderElite said:
The right was so desperate for a win after Trump/Harris that they have been jubilant and calling it a landslide. I'd concede Vance won, but Walz did fine overall. Vance was smoother, Walz made more incisive points on several issues.

It not a draw, then pretty close to it.
Click to expand...
I don't know of any VP debate in my life that was truly consequential for the election.
 
Cypress said:

First Flash Polls on Vance-Walz Debate Clash Revealed​


Snap polls following Tuesday’s vice presidential debate show voters think Ohio Sen. JD Vance and his Democratic opponent, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, ended their verbal jousting in a virtual draw.

A flash poll by CBS News and YouGov, released shortly after the debate aired, saw 42 percent of likely voters giving a win to Vance and 41 percent to Walz, while 17 percent judged it a tie.

A CNN poll of registered voters who watched the debate, conducted by SSRS produced a similar result: 51 percent said they thought Vance performed better and 49 percent gave the nod to Walz.

Likely voters were also split 50/50 in a Politico/Focaldata snap poll. However, the Politico poll showed Walz with a sixteen point lead among independent voters: 58 percent said the Minnesota governor won the debate versus 42 percent who sided with Vance.

One poll broke with the pack: a Daily Mail/J.L Partners survey of likely voters found that 50 percent said Vance won compared to 43 percent who said Walz came out ahead.

Per CBS News and YouGov, Walz scored a higher rating for sounding “reasonable” during the debate in comparison to Vance’s 65 percent, though Vance walked out of the debate with a more favorable view than what people had of him before his appearance. Vance’s favorability rating improved from 40 percent to 49 percent while Walz’ favorability rose from 52 percent to 60 percent.

www.thedailybeast.com

First Flash Polls’ Shock Verdict on Vance-Walz Clash Revealed

The results are in on who outshone the other at Tuesday night’s debate.
www.thedailybeast.com
Click to expand...
That's the desperate narrative the lying left media is frantically trying to make up. Everyone knows better.
 
Cypress said:

First Flash Polls on Vance-Walz Debate Clash Revealed​


Snap polls following Tuesday’s vice presidential debate show voters think Ohio Sen. JD Vance and his Democratic opponent, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, ended their verbal jousting in a virtual draw.

A flash poll by CBS News and YouGov, released shortly after the debate aired, saw 42 percent of likely voters giving a win to Vance and 41 percent to Walz, while 17 percent judged it a tie.

A CNN poll of registered voters who watched the debate, conducted by SSRS produced a similar result: 51 percent said they thought Vance performed better and 49 percent gave the nod to Walz.

Likely voters were also split 50/50 in a Politico/Focaldata snap poll. However, the Politico poll showed Walz with a sixteen point lead among independent voters: 58 percent said the Minnesota governor won the debate versus 42 percent who sided with Vance.

One poll broke with the pack: a Daily Mail/J.L Partners survey of likely voters found that 50 percent said Vance won compared to 43 percent who said Walz came out ahead.

Per CBS News and YouGov, Walz scored a higher rating for sounding “reasonable” during the debate in comparison to Vance’s 65 percent, though Vance walked out of the debate with a more favorable view than what people had of him before his appearance. Vance’s favorability rating improved from 40 percent to 49 percent while Walz’ favorability rose from 52 percent to 60 percent.

www.thedailybeast.com

First Flash Polls’ Shock Verdict on Vance-Walz Clash Revealed

The results are in on who outshone the other at Tuesday night’s debate.
www.thedailybeast.com
Click to expand...
There isn't much more that could be expected from a vp debate. I don't believe their are really all that consequential.
 
Yakuda said:
There isn't much more that could be expected from a vp debate. I don't believe their are really all that consequential.
Click to expand...
trump really needed someone to balance him out in the eyes of the voters, and Vance(or whatever he is calling himself now) is not that person. trump now needs to tone down his own insanity, which does not appear to be possible.

Meanwhile, Harris needed someone who looks plausible, which Walz did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top