For all of the Vindman lovers out there

Teflon Don

Teflon Don

I'm back baby
How many of you used the term General Betrayus?

anyone care to admit it?

He even has a Bronze Star

I seem to remember leftists ripping him apart.
 
Why do you need the number? I did not do that. Nor do I see what Petraeus's crappy misuse of security for sex relates to this. I know nobody who is in love with him. Do you think there are people who are after his testimony? I don't think so. Does your Vindman hate disqualify you from commenting?
 
Teflon Don said:
How many of you used the term General Betrayus?

anyone care to admit it?

He even has a Bronze Star

I seem to remember leftists ripping him apart.
Click to expand...

Nothing says laughably pathetic better than members of the Democratic Party of the Jackass pretending to care about the military. Meanwhile, they make a mockery of our institutions, the military as a whole and our election processes.
 
Nordberg said:
Why do you need the number? I did not do that. Nor do I see what Petraeus's crappy misuse of security for sex relates to this. I know nobody who is in love with him. Do you think there are people who are after his testimony? I don't think so. Does your Vindman hate disqualify you from commenting?
Click to expand...

stupidometer.gif
 
Teflon Don said:
How many of you used the term General Betrayus?

anyone care to admit it?

He even has a Bronze Star

I seem to remember leftists ripping him apart.
Click to expand...

It's always a "whataboutism" with wingers, apples and oranges, can't get around the fact that Vindman is narrating what he heard and what he saw, both of which pretty much validates what the other witnesses have testified, the Trump used approved military aid as a leverage to get the Ukrainians to investigate an American citizen for Trump's own political ends
 
Teflon Don said:
How many of you used the term General Betrayus?

anyone care to admit it?

He even has a Bronze Star

I seem to remember leftists ripping him apart.
Click to expand...

I was super young at the time, so I wasn't following politics.

However, I don't think there is anything wrong with criticizing a decorated soldier. What I think is stupid is saying we can't trust Vindman because he was born in Ukraine or because he worked with Ukrainians. That's just grasping at straws, which is what the Trumpcucks have been doing this whole time.
 
archives said:
It's always a "whataboutism" with wingers, apples and oranges, can't get around the fact that Vindman is narrating what he heard and what he saw, both of which pretty much validates what the other witnesses have testified, the Trump used approved military aid as a leverage to get the Ukrainians to investigate an American citizen for Trump's own political ends
Click to expand...

It's simply Follow the Leader. Trump does #whataboutism pathologically, so of course his cucks do the same.
 
archives said:
It's always a "whataboutism" with wingers, apples and oranges, can't get around the fact that Vindman is narrating what he heard and what he saw, both of which pretty much validates what the other witnesses have testified, the Trump used approved military aid as a leverage to get the Ukrainians to investigate an American citizen for Trump's own political ends
Click to expand...

why don't you bottom line it for yourself, put yourself out of your misery

wtf do you think the Democrats can do about it, except whine?

answer...nothing
you're losing the battle, and you live in denial

StoneByStone said:
I was super young at the time, so I wasn't following politics.

However, I don't think there is anything wrong with criticizing a decorated soldier. What I think is stupid is saying we can't trust Vindman because he was born in Ukraine or because he worked with Ukrainians. That's just grasping at straws, which is what the Trumpcucks have been doing this whole time.
Click to expand...

CNN has made an idiot out of you, hows that feel?

"vindman" has an opinion.. since when do military officers opinions on policy outweigh their commander -in- chiefs

these people are traitors, can't operate a military with traitors in the ranks
 
Getin the ring said:
CNN has made an idiot out of you, hows that feel?
Click to expand...

You're assuming that just because you're an NPC for Fox, I'm an NPC for CNN. I don't trust CNN.

"vindman" has an opinion.. since when do military officers opinions on policy outweigh their commander -in- chiefs
Click to expand...

Depends on the situation. This particular commander-in-chief is a pathological liar, so he can't be trusted.
 
StoneByStone said:
It's simply Follow the Leader. Trump does #whataboutism pathologically, so of course his cucks do the same.
Click to expand...

Here's an appropriate word someone on an independent news show just called Trump...A "Cockwomble".

An overly officious oaf or spiteful person. Someone who takes great delight in the misery of others by being deliberately obtuse and ignorant.
 
StoneByStone said:
I was super young at the time, so I wasn't following politics.

However, I don't think there is anything wrong with criticizing a decorated soldier. What I think is stupid is saying we can't trust Vindman because he was born in Ukraine or because he worked with Ukrainians. That's just grasping at straws, which is what the Trumpcucks have been doing this whole time.
Click to expand...

The left sure did when Trump did it. What is different now? The only difference now is that this one is a liar. He didn't hear or see anything because he wasn't there during the phone call.
What's sad about this whole circus is that there are all these witnesses who claim knowledge of this one phone call like they were all gathered around Trump when this call was made. That,
and the fact that the individual who was on the other end of this phone call says nothing like what these idiots are saying was said. How do you account for that? Prove he's lying. You can't.
 
Getin the ring said:
why don't you bottom line it for yourself, put yourself out of your misery

wtf do you think the Democrats can do about it, except whine?

answer...nothing
you're losing the battle, and you live in denial



CNN has made an idiot out of you, hows that feel?

"vindman" has an opinion.. since when do military officers opinions on policy outweigh their commander -in- chiefs

these people are traitors, can't operate a military with traitors in the ranks
Click to expand...

Oh, oh, "gettin" appears getting nervous

The Democrats can impeach Trump if they feel the evidence leans that way, Donny will go down in history as the fourth ever President to be impeached. And, which is most likely their goal, expose Trump's willingness to use even the Nation's foreign policy to attain his own political ends, something even the Founding Fathers warned us against

Vindman's opinion supported by facts pretty much confirms the the opinions of nearly a dozen others close to the events
 
RB 60 said:
The left sure did when Trump did it. What is different now? The only difference now is that this one is a liar. He didn't hear or see anything because he wasn't there during the phone call.
What's sad about this whole circus is that there are all these witnesses who claim knowledge of this one phone call like they were all gathered around Trump when this call was made. That,
and the fact that the individual who was on the other end of this phone call says nothing like what these idiots are saying was said. How do you account for that? Prove he's lying. You can't.
Click to expand...

Two witnesses this morning were in on the phone call, and they confirmed the narratives offered by prior individuals close to the surrounding events
 
archives said:
Oh, oh, "gettin" appears getting nervous

The Democrats can impeach Trump if they feel the evidence leans that way, Donny will go down in history as the fourth ever President to be impeached. And, which is most likely their goal, expose Trump's willingness to use even the Nation's foreign policy to attain his own political ends, something even the Founding Fathers warned us against

Vindman's opinion supported by facts pretty much confirms the the opinions of nearly a dozen others close to the events
Click to expand...

So this "nearly a dozen" were all gathered around Trump when this call was made? Interesting it was just their "opinions," isn't it?

laughter.gif
 
the Dude was not in uniform for his job -the NSC position is a civilian -so why wear the scrambled eggs?
He's so stuck on himself -just another weasel
 
archives said:
Two witnesses this morning were in on the phone call, and they confirmed the narratives offered by prior individuals close to the surrounding events
Click to expand...

You still can't explain why the person on the other end of the call says they are lying.
 
The narrative is it was leverage,but it wasn't according to the principles on the call -which is all that matters.
Who cares about these butt hurt bozos?
"I'm not a #neverTrumper" - sure -because you wear a uniform I'm supposed to believe it?

Vindman's policy is "Ukraine first" - fuck that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top