before she latches onto another vaccination scam.
Illustration from 1909 shows Mary Mallon cooking skulls. (Fotosearch/Getty Images)
https://www.nydailynews.com/resizer...aws.com/public/VKKO5HC6TCIYHTKAJLU5RQNVOU.jpg
Mary Mallon, forever known as Typhoid Mary, carried the deadly disease and spread it to others
BY Mara Bovsun
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Saturday, July 13, 2013, 10:29 PM
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/justice-story/typhoid-mary-carrier-death-article-1.1398166
There is no evidence that Typhoid Mary deliberately infected anyone. There is ample proof that Typhoid Nancy did it deliberately with open-borders. Carry Typhoid Nancy’s politics to their logical conclusion and you will see that the more sick people she can infect with open-borders the more she can justify the Democrat Party’s Culture of Death with more killing disguised as curing the infected.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?108632-The-U-N-%92s-Prize&p=2770729#post2770729
Typhoid Nancy and the rest of the Democrat Party’s sisterhood represent the worst of womankind. Importing diseases so the government can force everybody to be vaccinated is only slightly worse than Margaret Sanger’s slaughterhouses.
Voluntary vaccination participation is fine, but I always smell forced vaccinations in the wind blowing from politicians and doctors. Whatever the truth is about any vaccine, the sharpshooters are always behind the curtain manipulating the public for tax dollars. Forced vaccinations amounts to big tax dollars ad infinitum.
NOTE: Never forget the evil made possible by forced vaccinations:
Software billionaire Bill Gates, who previously has advocated the reduction of the human population through the use of vaccines, and his wife Melinda marked the 100th year since the First International Eugenics Congress in London with a “family planning” summit with abortionists and the United Nations.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-On-The-Northern-Border&p=2786426#post2786426
Forced vaccinations is also forced Socialism:
My personal belief is that individuals should decide vaccinations for themselves and their children.
As usual, television mouths are being paid big bucks to run with another vaccination scare tactic. Happily, the New York Post exposed the fraud:
Illustration from 1909 shows Mary Mallon cooking skulls. (Fotosearch/Getty Images)
https://www.nydailynews.com/resizer...aws.com/public/VKKO5HC6TCIYHTKAJLU5RQNVOU.jpg
Mary Mallon, forever known as Typhoid Mary, carried the deadly disease and spread it to others
BY Mara Bovsun
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Saturday, July 13, 2013, 10:29 PM
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/justice-story/typhoid-mary-carrier-death-article-1.1398166
There is no evidence that Typhoid Mary deliberately infected anyone. There is ample proof that Typhoid Nancy did it deliberately with open-borders. Carry Typhoid Nancy’s politics to their logical conclusion and you will see that the more sick people she can infect with open-borders the more she can justify the Democrat Party’s Culture of Death with more killing disguised as curing the infected.
It was Democrats like Typhoid Nancy who added “Give me your sick” to the rest of the garbage found in Lazarus’ sonnet. Naturally, Pelosi’s interpretation of “give me” means “give you” the sick. That is why I often suggested removing Emma Lazarus’ stain from Lady Liberty’s pedestal and hanging it right over Typhoid Nancy’s front door.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?108632-The-U-N-%92s-Prize&p=2770729#post2770729
Typhoid Nancy and the rest of the Democrat Party’s sisterhood represent the worst of womankind. Importing diseases so the government can force everybody to be vaccinated is only slightly worse than Margaret Sanger’s slaughterhouses.
Voluntary vaccination participation is fine, but I always smell forced vaccinations in the wind blowing from politicians and doctors. Whatever the truth is about any vaccine, the sharpshooters are always behind the curtain manipulating the public for tax dollars. Forced vaccinations amounts to big tax dollars ad infinitum.
NOTE: Never forget the evil made possible by forced vaccinations:
Software billionaire Bill Gates, who previously has advocated the reduction of the human population through the use of vaccines, and his wife Melinda marked the 100th year since the First International Eugenics Congress in London with a “family planning” summit with abortionists and the United Nations.
Bill Gates: World needs fewer people
Joins abortionists for 'family planning' conference on eugenics
Published: 08/19/2012 at 4:36 PM
by BOB UNRUH
http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/bill-gates-world-needs-fewer-people/
Joins abortionists for 'family planning' conference on eugenics
Published: 08/19/2012 at 4:36 PM
by BOB UNRUH
http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/bill-gates-world-needs-fewer-people/
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-On-The-Northern-Border&p=2786426#post2786426
Forced vaccinations is also forced Socialism:
When Hillary Clinton proclaimed that it takes a village to raise a child, many people didn't realize that she was enunciating liberal dogma that the government should raise and control children. This concept fell on fertile soil when it reached activist judges eager to be anointed as elders of the child-raising village.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on November 2, 2005 that parents' fundamental right to control the upbringing of their children "does not extend beyond the threshold of the school door," and that a public school has the right to provide its students with "whatever information it wishes to provide, sexual or otherwise."
Instead of using the "village" metaphor, the judges substituted a Latin phrase that has the same effect. Parens patriae (the country as parent) was a legal concept used long ago by the English monarchy, but it never caught on in the United States and the few mentions of it in U.S. cases are not relevant to this decision.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on November 2, 2005 that parents' fundamental right to control the upbringing of their children "does not extend beyond the threshold of the school door," and that a public school has the right to provide its students with "whatever information it wishes to provide, sexual or otherwise."
Instead of using the "village" metaphor, the judges substituted a Latin phrase that has the same effect. Parens patriae (the country as parent) was a legal concept used long ago by the English monarchy, but it never caught on in the United States and the few mentions of it in U.S. cases are not relevant to this decision.
Judicial Supremacists Lash Out at Parents
Phillis Schlafly
DECEMBER 2005
https://eagleforum.org/psr/2005/dec05/psrdec05.html
Phillis Schlafly
DECEMBER 2005
https://eagleforum.org/psr/2005/dec05/psrdec05.html
My personal belief is that individuals should decide vaccinations for themselves and their children.
There are many reasonable arm-twisting measures that could be taken to encourage vaccination, such as categorically excluding unvaccinated children from public schools, denying unvaccinated persons entry or reentry into the United States, and the like.
The fight over vaccinations is not a new one. Since the invention of vaccines, their use and their mandatory use have been a hotly contested issues. In the early days of the Progressive movement, when panels of experts in thrall to a vision of their managerial expertise rolled over the literally and metaphorically untidy cities and rural communities in which social dysfunction flourished, resistance to mandatory vaccinations became a crusade, especially in New England. The Supreme Court decided in Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) that the state could fine a Swedish immigrant who refused to undergo mandatory vaccination, protesting that he’d been made seriously ill by an earlier vaccination. Just a few years prior, the case of Wong Wai v. Williamson considered whether federal authorities could require that all of San Francisco’s Chinese residents undergo a fairly dangerous vaccination against the bubonic plague or be forcibly prevented from leaving the city.
In Jacobson, Justice John Marshall Harlan found that the vaccine resister in question could be fined, and punished for refusing to pay the fine, but that he could not be physically coerced into accepting the vaccination. But the precedent — that state interests trump individuals’ control of their own bodies — provided Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. with the ammunition he needed to find in Buck v. Bell that “the protection and health of the state” was sufficient to justify involuntary sterilizations of “the unfit” and “defectives” — principally meaning mentally disabled people — whose rights were, in his judgment, not protected by the 14th Amendment, at least not to such an extent that they could not be forcibly neutered like stray dogs. “Three generations of imbeciles are enough,” the justice infamously wrote.
The fight over vaccinations is not a new one. Since the invention of vaccines, their use and their mandatory use have been a hotly contested issues. In the early days of the Progressive movement, when panels of experts in thrall to a vision of their managerial expertise rolled over the literally and metaphorically untidy cities and rural communities in which social dysfunction flourished, resistance to mandatory vaccinations became a crusade, especially in New England. The Supreme Court decided in Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905) that the state could fine a Swedish immigrant who refused to undergo mandatory vaccination, protesting that he’d been made seriously ill by an earlier vaccination. Just a few years prior, the case of Wong Wai v. Williamson considered whether federal authorities could require that all of San Francisco’s Chinese residents undergo a fairly dangerous vaccination against the bubonic plague or be forcibly prevented from leaving the city.
In Jacobson, Justice John Marshall Harlan found that the vaccine resister in question could be fined, and punished for refusing to pay the fine, but that he could not be physically coerced into accepting the vaccination. But the precedent — that state interests trump individuals’ control of their own bodies — provided Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. with the ammunition he needed to find in Buck v. Bell that “the protection and health of the state” was sufficient to justify involuntary sterilizations of “the unfit” and “defectives” — principally meaning mentally disabled people — whose rights were, in his judgment, not protected by the 14th Amendment, at least not to such an extent that they could not be forcibly neutered like stray dogs. “Three generations of imbeciles are enough,” the justice infamously wrote.
February 3, 2015 6:01 PM
A Vaccine against Chaos
The idea that elites know best, versus individuals’ control of their own bodies.
By Kevin D. Williamson
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/397840/vaccine-against-chaos-kevin-d-williamson
A Vaccine against Chaos
The idea that elites know best, versus individuals’ control of their own bodies.
By Kevin D. Williamson
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/397840/vaccine-against-chaos-kevin-d-williamson
As usual, television mouths are being paid big bucks to run with another vaccination scare tactic. Happily, the New York Post exposed the fraud:
A CNN reporter broadcasts from Wuhan, China, on the recent viral outbreak. There is nobody near who could possibly infect him -— unless the cameraman has Guinness Book of Records coughs and sneezes. So why does he insist on wearing a blue surgical mask while talking?
It’s called “drama,” which is badly needed, because there appears to be nothing very special about this outbreak of the 2019-nCoV or Wuhan -virus. It should actually be called the DvV, or Déjà vu Virus, because we have been through these hysterias before. Over and over. Heterosexual AIDS, Ebola repeatedly, the H1N1 swine flu that was actually vastly milder than the regular flu and, especially, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003.
Once you start debunking mass hysteria over outbreaks, it gets easy, because the same patterns repeat themselves.
It’s called “drama,” which is badly needed, because there appears to be nothing very special about this outbreak of the 2019-nCoV or Wuhan -virus. It should actually be called the DvV, or Déjà vu Virus, because we have been through these hysterias before. Over and over. Heterosexual AIDS, Ebola repeatedly, the H1N1 swine flu that was actually vastly milder than the regular flu and, especially, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003.
Once you start debunking mass hysteria over outbreaks, it gets easy, because the same patterns repeat themselves.
Don’t buy the media hype over the new China virus
By Michael Fumento
January 23, 2020 | 8:29pm
https://nypost.com/2020/01/23/dont-buy-the-media-hype-over-the-new-china-virus/
By Michael Fumento
January 23, 2020 | 8:29pm
https://nypost.com/2020/01/23/dont-buy-the-media-hype-over-the-new-china-virus/