Get your popcorn ready for Jim Jordan's cross examination of swamp rat Mueller

[Robo]

To hell with the Democrat’s phony debates. I wouldn’t watch that crap if it were the only thing on TV.

But, WHOOPIE!!! I can’t wait for Bobby Mueller’s testimony before the Congress. I’m gettin my popcorn ready for Jim Jordan’s & the other Republican’s cross examination of Bobby the swamp rat.

Why didn’t you investigate Hillary Clinton, the Steel dossier, the illegal FISA warrants, the unmasking of hundreds of Americans Bobby? When did you first know that there was NO COLLUSION between Trump & Russians? Did you look at our own FBI, DOJ & Intel agencies for collusion with Russians and a qoup-de-qua to put an illegal thumb on the scales of the 2016 election & unseat a duly elected President after he was elected Bobby? Why did you say the Russians you indicted & will never prosecute had the assumptions of innocents until proven guilty, but you couldn’t determine Trump hadn’t committed a crime Bobby? Why the double standard Bobby? Why did you hire only a gang of rabid mad junkyard dog Democrat Trump haters to investigate Trump? Why didn’t you indict Jimmy Comey your best buddy for leaking classified information to the media? Why didn’t you indict Rod Rosenstein for overseeing your investigation while he was a witness himself in your investigation? If you truly believed Trump committed obstruction Bobby, why didn’t you challenge the DOJ’s principle of not indicting a sitting President in the court because it has NO constitutional authority as you well know.

The Congress needs to question Mueller the swamp rat for at least a week and give every member a half our to question his swamp skunk ass.

 

[John Barron]

To hell with the Democrat’s phony debates. I wouldn’t watch that crap if it were the only thing on TV.

But, WHOOPIE!!! I can’t wait for Bobby Mueller’s testimony before the Congress. I’m gettin my popcorn ready for Jim Jordan’s & the other Republican’s cross examination of Bobby the swamp rat.

Why didn’t you investigate Hillary Clinton, the Steel dossier, the illegal FISA warrants, the unmasking of hundreds of Americans Bobby? When did you first know that there was NO COLLUSION between Trump & Russians? Did you look at our own FBI, DOJ & Intel agencies for collusion with Russians and a qoup-de-qua to put an illegal thumb on the scales of the 2016 election & unseat a duly elected President after he was elected Bobby? Why did you say the Russians you indicted & will never prosecute had the assumptions of innocents until proven guilty, but you couldn’t determine Trump hadn’t committed a crime Bobby? Why the double standard Bobby? Why did you hire only a gang of rabid mad junkyard dog Democrat Trump haters to investigate Trump? Why didn’t you indict Jimmy Comey your best buddy for leaking classified information to the media? Why didn’t you indict Rod Rosenstein for overseeing your investigation while he was a witness himself in your investigation? If you truly believed Trump committed obstruction Bobby, why didn’t you challenge the DOJ’s principle of not indicting a sitting President in the court because it has NO constitutional authority as you well know.

The Congress needs to question Mueller the swamp rat for at least a week and give every member a half our to question his swamp skunk ass.

We know already you only like people that will lie for your god Trump.

 

[Truth Detector]

To hell with the Democrat’s phony debates. I wouldn’t watch that crap if it were the only thing on TV.

But, WHOOPIE!!! I can’t wait for Bobby Mueller’s testimony before the Congress. I’m gettin my popcorn ready for Jim Jordan’s & the other Republican’s cross examination of Bobby the swamp rat.

Why didn’t you investigate Hillary Clinton, the Steel dossier, the illegal FISA warrants, the unmasking of hundreds of Americans Bobby? When did you first know that there was NO COLLUSION between Trump & Russians? Did you look at our own FBI, DOJ & Intel agencies for collusion with Russians and a qoup-de-qua to put an illegal thumb on the scales of the 2016 election & unseat a duly elected President after he was elected Bobby? Why did you say the Russians you indicted & will never prosecute had the assumptions of innocents until proven guilty, but you couldn’t determine Trump hadn’t committed a crime Bobby? Why the double standard Bobby? Why did you hire only a gang of rabid mad junkyard dog Democrat Trump haters to investigate Trump? Why didn’t you indict Jimmy Comey your best buddy for leaking classified information to the media? Why didn’t you indict Rod Rosenstein for overseeing your investigation while he was a witness himself in your investigation? If you truly believed Trump committed obstruction Bobby, why didn’t you challenge the DOJ’s principle of not indicting a sitting President in the court because it has NO constitutional authority as you well know.

The Congress needs to question Mueller the swamp rat for at least a week and give every member a half our to question his swamp skunk ass.

THAT clown show will be worth watching. The Party of the Jackass are clueless how stupid they look right now.

 

[Truth Detector]

We know already you only like people that will lie for your god Trump.

Irony from a pathological lying buffoon like yourself.

 

[evince]

We know already you only like people that will lie for your god Trump.

russo bot holes are like that


lots of them here


it only cost Putin about 12 cents an hour to run them


very cost effective for the GRU (the new KGB)

 

[domer76]

To hell with the Democrat’s phony debates. I wouldn’t watch that crap if it were the only thing on TV.

But, WHOOPIE!!! I can’t wait for Bobby Mueller’s testimony before the Congress. I’m gettin my popcorn ready for Jim Jordan’s & the other Republican’s cross examination of Bobby the swamp rat.

Why didn’t you investigate Hillary Clinton, the Steel dossier, the illegal FISA warrants, the unmasking of hundreds of Americans Bobby? When did you first know that there was NO COLLUSION between Trump & Russians? Did you look at our own FBI, DOJ & Intel agencies for collusion with Russians and a qoup-de-qua to put an illegal thumb on the scales of the 2016 election & unseat a duly elected President after he was elected Bobby? Why did you say the Russians you indicted & will never prosecute had the assumptions of innocents until proven guilty, but you couldn’t determine Trump hadn’t committed a crime Bobby? Why the double standard Bobby? Why did you hire only a gang of rabid mad junkyard dog Democrat Trump haters to investigate Trump? Why didn’t you indict Jimmy Comey your best buddy for leaking classified information to the media? Why didn’t you indict Rod Rosenstein for overseeing your investigation while he was a witness himself in your investigation? If you truly believed Trump committed obstruction Bobby, why didn’t you challenge the DOJ’s principle of not indicting a sitting President in the court because it has NO constitutional authority as you well know.

The Congress needs to question Mueller the swamp rat for at least a week and give every member a half our to question his swamp skunk ass.

I can’t wait for a stupid question like “when did you realize there was NO COLLUSION?” because that’s a fucking lie perpetuated by you illiterate morons. Mueller will straighten idiots like that out in a heartbeat.

Even better, an idiotic “why didn’t you investigate Hillary?”

 

[anonymoose]

To hell with the Democrat’s phony debates. I wouldn’t watch that crap if it were the only thing on TV.

But, WHOOPIE!!! I can’t wait for Bobby Mueller’s testimony before the Congress. I’m gettin my popcorn ready for Jim Jordan’s & the other Republican’s cross examination of Bobby the swamp rat.

Why didn’t you investigate Hillary Clinton, the Steel dossier, the illegal FISA warrants, the unmasking of hundreds of Americans Bobby? When did you first know that there was NO COLLUSION between Trump & Russians? Did you look at our own FBI, DOJ & Intel agencies for collusion with Russians and a qoup-de-qua to put an illegal thumb on the scales of the 2016 election & unseat a duly elected President after he was elected Bobby? Why did you say the Russians you indicted & will never prosecute had the assumptions of innocents until proven guilty, but you couldn’t determine Trump hadn’t committed a crime Bobby? Why the double standard Bobby? Why did you hire only a gang of rabid mad junkyard dog Democrat Trump haters to investigate Trump? Why didn’t you indict Jimmy Comey your best buddy for leaking classified information to the media? Why didn’t you indict Rod Rosenstein for overseeing your investigation while he was a witness himself in your investigation? If you truly believed Trump committed obstruction Bobby, why didn’t you challenge the DOJ’s principle of not indicting a sitting President in the court because it has NO constitutional authority as you well know.

The Congress needs to question Mueller the swamp rat for at least a week and give every member a half our to question his swamp skunk ass.

Robert Mueller: The Guest Who Won’t Leave

Everyone has met Robert Mueller. He’s the guest who won’t leave the party. You first notice him as an awkward presence gradually eroding the pleasant ambience by hovering silently at the edge of the festivities. Then, after he has had a couple of drinks, he begins to insert himself into random conversations with solipsistic non sequiturs. At length, after everyone else has contrived to leave early, you discover that he’s too drunk to drive even if he could find his keys. You call a cab, but he misses it and you find him asleep in your front yard the next day. This is what it’s like to get rid of someone like Mueller.

Having waited nearly two years for him to complete his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, and been provided with a copy of his report by Attorney General Barr in March, we thought we were finally rid of this guy. Indeed, during his May 29 press conference, he promised to go home. The ostensible purpose of that bizarre event was to assure us that his report to the AG “speaks for itself” and that he had nothing to add: “The report is my testimony.” And yet, months later, he’s still hanging around and will now testify before the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees on July 17.

This was gleefully announced late Tuesday by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Adam Schiff (D-CA), the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee. Nadler and Schiff allegedly compelled a “reluctant” Mueller to appear pursuant to subpoenas issued by their committees. But the erstwhile special counsel has clearly been trailing his coat before the House since March, when he discovered that Attorney General Barr would not give Congress Mueller’s tendentious “executive summaries” before releasing the entire report. Thus Nadler and Schiff orchestrated a show trial:

Americans have demanded to hear directly from the Special Counsel so they can understand what he and his team examined, uncovered, and determined about Russia’s attack on our democracy, the Trump campaign’s acceptance and use of that help, and President Trump and his associates’ obstruction of the investigation into that attack. We look forward to hearing his testimony, as do all Americans.

Every syllable of this is nonsense, of course. The public has had access to the entire Mueller report, including his executive summaries, for two months. They know perfectly well what it says — President Trump isn’t guilty of colluding with the Russians or obstructing justice. Moreover, a solid majority of the voters want Nadler, Schiff, and their accomplices to move on from their interminable investigations and get to work on something useful: “Sixty-three percent of respondents said the investigations into Trump are hurting the country. While 58 percent said it’s time for Congress to turn the page.”

This would be a wise move for Nadler and Schiff. Bringing Mueller before the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees is not without risks for the Democrats. Those committees contain Republicans who have long wanted to ask Mueller questions about the oddly selective manner in which he pursued evidence, why he packed his team with overt Clinton partisans, what precisely was the provenance of the famously fishy FISA warrant used to justify spying on Trump campaign aides, etc. Liberal law professor Alan Dershowitz warns the Democrats that they may be “shooting themselves in the foot.”

He can’t refuse to answer questions about the FISA application.… Those are the kind of questions that I think Republicans will be very well prepared to ask. Those are the kind of questions which are currently under investigation by the inspector general whose report we are waiting for. But those are not in any way precluded. So I think that they will regret having called him.

Dershowitz is by no means the only Democrat who worries about the consequences of the Nadler and Schiff hearings. Douglas Schoen, a consultant who has worked with Bill Clinton and a wide variety of lesser Democratic lights, thinks the Mueller hearings are a bad idea. Mueller has pledged that he will give no testimony that isn’t covered by his report, so he is unlikely to allow the Democrats to tie him down further on whether he or his team found sufficient evidence to charge Trump with obstruction of justice. Thus, the hearings hold far more risk than potential gains for the Democrats. Schoen writes:

It would be a profound mistake for Democrats to yet again lose sight of what voters are concerned with and put all of their hopes on Robert Mueller to either impeach Trump or defeat him for re-election in 2020. Ultimately, if all the Democrats are looking for is to put on a televised political spectacle… the only thing they will end up with is four more years of Donald Trump in the White House.

If the Democrats want to know where these hearings are really going, they should listen to the eagerness with which the Republicans are looking forward to questioning Mueller. They would do well to heed the warning offered by Mark Meadows (R-NC), “This is the Democrats trying to resurrect a Russia collusion narrative that the American people are tired of. And yet, Mr. Mueller has not been subject to cross examination. He will be now.” Likewise, Lindsey Graham predicts, “This will blow up in their faces. The conclusions can’t change. There is no collusion. That’s what the whole thing was about to begin with.”

Robert Mueller is the Beltway counterpart of the guest who won’t leave. And, like that feckless character, he has nothing to offer those who invited him to the soirée yet doesn’t have enough sense to know it. In the Nadler and Schiff hearings, he will bore everyone with self-aggrandizing sermons that will irritate his hosts, frustrate their guests in the press gallery, and bore the public. If the Dems know what they’re doing, they will give Mueller the bum’s rush before the voters quietly slip out of their obviously dead party.
https://spectator.org/robert-mueller-the-guest-who-wont-leave/

.

 

[Truth Detector]

I can’t wait for a stupid question like “when did you realize there was NO COLLUSION?” because that’s a fucking lie perpetuated by you illiterate morons. Mueller will straighten idiots like that out in a heartbeat.
Even better, an idiotic “why didn’t you investigate Hillary?”

STFU you mentally retarded asshat. No one wants to engage a moron like you.

 

[Truth Detector]

1.) Why did you hire only lawyers with backgrounds as Democratic Party donors for your investigative team? Were there no Establishment Republicans willing to help railroad President Trump?

2.) Peter Strzok was removed from your team after more than 10,000 texts between him and fellow team member Lisa Page were found to contain vitriolic anti-Trump tirades. These texts were not simply anti-Trump. They were more in the nature of desperate attempts to stop him from becoming president and talk of a nefarious insurance policy to orchestrate his removal if he were elected. Did they ever speak this way about Donald Trump in your presence? Why were you so determined to have people with outright hatred of Donald Trump on your special counsel team?

3.) Andrew Weissman has unsightly political ties, having attended Clinton’s election-night celebration in New York City. He also sent an email to acting Attorney General Sally Yates, praising her boldness on the night she was fired for refusing to enforce President Trump’s travel ban. Not to mention his vast history of prosecutorial abuses.

Both of you were involved in the investigation into Russia’s illegal efforts to obtain U.S. uranium. Did either of you alert the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to the crimes being committed? The plea deals? Did either of you profit in any way from the $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation or from those who benefited from the sale of U.S. uranium that would ultimately end up in the hands of Russian owners? Do you consider this to be a potential conflict of interest to the current investigation?

4.) What efforts have you undertaken to identify the leakers in your team who’ve revealed investigative details to the media? Were the leaks done with your permission or encouragement? When do you believe the statutes of limitations would run on possible prosecutions of you or your team for any such criminal leaks?

5.) Have you threatened White House officials with investigative actions or public statements regarding opposition by the White House to your partisan personnel decisions? Have you asked staff of the deputy attorney general’s office to issue these threats on your behalf?

6.) Were you aware that Judge Rudolph Contreras, who accepted former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s guilty plea, also served on the FISA court and had a personal relationship with team member Strzok? Did you know that Strzok interviewed Flynn? Was Contreras angry about being recused for all his conflicts of interest?

8.) Are you investigating the unmasking of American citizens in these matters? For example, Flynn’s name was somehow unmasked in the NSA surveillance, which apparently allowed the Obama administration to peruse his meetings and conversations. Are you investigating this unmasking of American citizens?

9.) Was Flynn made aware of the exculpatory evidence, before he entered his guilty plea, that the interviewing FBI agents did not believe he intentionally lied to them? Was the judge who took the plea aware of the agents’ belief that Flynn did not have intent to deceive?

10.) Where are the FBI’s notes from the Flynn interview? If they were provided to Flynn, when?

11.) Did you or anyone else on your team get the required signoff from then-national security adviser H.R. McMaster, as required on any retasking of NSA surveillance, in April of 2017 when the direct FISA surveillance of Carter Page and indirect surveillance of Trump was again extended, this time with approval by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein?

 

[Gonzomin]

Jordan is a clown who uses every session to prove he has a big mouth and will do whatever the far right wants. He turns a questioning session into "what about me" Look here I am loud and proud to say dumb shit for the Rush's and Infowar audience.

 

[archives]

Jordan is a clown who uses every session to prove he has a big mouth and will do whatever the far right wants. He turns a questioning session into "what about me" Look here I am loud and proud to say dumb shit for the Rush's and Infowar audience.

True, and even though he has been put on his ass a number times, even by Sessions, he just keeps repeating himself, he makes good theater on the demogogues shows

 

[archives]

1.) Why did you hire only lawyers with backgrounds as Democratic Party donors for your investigative team? Were there no Establishment Republicans willing to help railroad President Trump?

2.) Peter Strzok was removed from your team after more than 10,000 texts between him and fellow team member Lisa Page were found to contain vitriolic anti-Trump tirades. These texts were not simply anti-Trump. They were more in the nature of desperate attempts to stop him from becoming president and talk of a nefarious insurance policy to orchestrate his removal if he were elected. Did they ever speak this way about Donald Trump in your presence? Why were you so determined to have people with outright hatred of Donald Trump on your special counsel team?

3.) Andrew Weissman has unsightly political ties, having attended Clinton’s election-night celebration in New York City. He also sent an email to acting Attorney General Sally Yates, praising her boldness on the night she was fired for refusing to enforce President Trump’s travel ban. Not to mention his vast history of prosecutorial abuses.

Both of you were involved in the investigation into Russia’s illegal efforts to obtain U.S. uranium. Did either of you alert the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States to the crimes being committed? The plea deals? Did either of you profit in any way from the $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation or from those who benefited from the sale of U.S. uranium that would ultimately end up in the hands of Russian owners? Do you consider this to be a potential conflict of interest to the current investigation?

4.) What efforts have you undertaken to identify the leakers in your team who’ve revealed investigative details to the media? Were the leaks done with your permission or encouragement? When do you believe the statutes of limitations would run on possible prosecutions of you or your team for any such criminal leaks?

5.) Have you threatened White House officials with investigative actions or public statements regarding opposition by the White House to your partisan personnel decisions? Have you asked staff of the deputy attorney general’s office to issue these threats on your behalf?

6.) Were you aware that Judge Rudolph Contreras, who accepted former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s guilty plea, also served on the FISA court and had a personal relationship with team member Strzok? Did you know that Strzok interviewed Flynn? Was Contreras angry about being recused for all his conflicts of interest?

8.) Are you investigating the unmasking of American citizens in these matters? For example, Flynn’s name was somehow unmasked in the NSA surveillance, which apparently allowed the Obama administration to peruse his meetings and conversations. Are you investigating this unmasking of American citizens?

9.) Was Flynn made aware of the exculpatory evidence, before he entered his guilty plea, that the interviewing FBI agents did not believe he intentionally lied to them? Was the judge who took the plea aware of the agents’ belief that Flynn did not have intent to deceive?

10.) Where are the FBI’s notes from the Flynn interview? If they were provided to Flynn, when?

11.) Did you or anyone else on your team get the required signoff from then-national security adviser H.R. McMaster, as required on any retasking of NSA surveillance, in April of 2017 when the direct FISA surveillance of Carter Page and indirect surveillance of Trump was again extended, this time with approval by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein?

It isn't almost comical how the Trumpkins just keep regurgitating the same old Hannity conspiracies

Mueller is a "establishment Republican," as are those who appointed him, but the one that gets me the most is the Email cabal

So now the Strzok and Page Emails are up to ten thousand. Let me ask a simple question, if you have ten thousand Emails, how in the hell does a dozen or so phrases, that is phrases, pulled from ten thousand Emails prove a grand conspiracy against Trump? If such a grand plot existed wouldn't there be more than a dozen or so phrases from such an abundant of Emails establishing an orchestrated effort to undermine Trump?

Should I wait for an answer?

 

[Truth Detector]

It isn't almost comical how the Trumpkins just keep regurgitating the same old Hannity conspiracies

More laughable that you continue to flail with this moronic meme and avoid any substance by CRYING and LYING. Do you ever tire of looking like a pathetic idiot?

We get it; you want to protect and defend a corrupt ideology built on lies. The rest of us find it abhorrent.

Mueller is a "establishment Republican," as are those who appointed him, but the one that gets me the most is the Email cabal

It isn't almost comical how the LEFTISTS just keep regurgitating the same old MSNBC lies.

So now the Strzok and Page Emails are up to ten thousand.

They were TEXT messages you clown. How can anyone expect to have an intelligent debate with a moron who can't get the most basic FACTS right?

Let me ask a simple question,

You're brain is "simple" and addled.

if you have ten thousand Emails, how in the hell does a dozen or so phrases, that is phrases, pulled from ten thousand Emails prove a grand conspiracy against Trump?

They weren't emails you brain dead hack. It isn't a conspiracy you brain dead hack. There is solid evidence of their corrupt attempts to spy on and derail a campaign.

If such a grand plot existed wouldn't there be more than a dozen or so phrases from such an abundant of Emails establishing an orchestrated effort to undermine Trump?

Should I wait for an answer?

What e-mails you simpleton? GO back to the beginning and re-read them again. This time attempt to engage your brain before that big mouth.

 

[Truth Detector]

Jordan is a clown who uses every session to prove he has a big mouth and will do whatever the far right wants. He turns a questioning session into "what about me" Look here I am loud and proud to say dumb shit for the Rush's and Infowar audience.

Why? Because an ass clown like you says so? Jim Jordan has more intelligence in his little finger than all the Democrat jackasses sitting on that panel.

You couldn't fill a thimble with yours.

 

[Truth Detector]

Jordan is a clown who uses every session to prove he has a big mouth and will do whatever the far right wants. He turns a questioning session into "what about me" Look here I am loud and proud to say dumb shit for the Rush's and Infowar audience.

True, and even though he has been put on his ass a number times, even by Sessions, he just keeps repeating himself, he makes good theater on the demogogues shows

Priceless, dumber and dumbest in a circle jerk of stupid.

 

[archives]

More laughable that you continue to flail with this moronic meme and avoid any substance by CRYING and LYING. Do you ever tire of looking like a pathetic idiot?

We get it; you want to protect and defend a corrupt ideology built on lies. The rest of us find it abhorrent.



It isn't almost comical how the LEFTISTS just keep regurgitating the same old MSNBC lies.



They were TEXT messages you clown. How can anyone expect to have an intelligent debate with a moron who can't get the most basic FACTS right?



You're brain is "simple" and addled.



They weren't emails you brain dead hack. It isn't a conspiracy you brain dead hack. There is solid evidence of their corrupt attempts to spy on and derail a campaign.



What e-mails you simpleton? GO back to the beginning and re-read them again. This time attempt to engage your brain before that big mouth.

Amazing

No, Mueller, and those that appointed him, are established Republicans. Mueller was appointed by three prior Republican Presidents to office and is documented as making contributions to the Republican Party. In addition, all the members on his staff were not Democrats as Hannity and Trump have told you, and lets not forget, he was appointed and overseen another established Republican

(https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-checking-donald-trumps-claims-about-Mueller/).

So even using your attempted deflection of "texts" rather than Email, they got a dozen or so phrases out of ten thousand "text" messages and you are telling us this is "solid evidence" that a conspiracy exists? With ten thousands "texts" available shouldn't they have been able to find more than a dozen or so that proves a threatening plot?

And not it is not a conspiracy, but rather an attempt to "derail a campaign," we got a dozen or so "texts" out of ten thousands "texts" that shows proof that there existed and attempt to "derail a campaign"

No matter how much you attempt to bait and switch, move the goal posts, your efforts still come up short, entertaining, but short, and the always included personal crapola only makes them even more comical

 

[archives]

Priceless, dumber and dumbest in a circle jerk of stupid.

 

[Gonzomin]

Amazing

No, Mueller, and those that appointed him, are established Republicans. Mueller was appointed by three prior Republican Presidents to office and is documented as making contributions to the Republican Party. In addition, all the members on his staff were not Democrats as Hannity and Trump have told you, and lets not forget, he was appointed and overseen another established Republican

(https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-checking-donald-trumps-claims-about-Mueller/).

So even using your attempted deflection of "texts" rather than Email, they got a dozen or so phrases out of ten thousand "text" messages and you are telling us this is "solid evidence" that a conspiracy exists? With ten thousands "texts" available shouldn't they have been able to find more than a dozen or so that proves a threatening plot?

And not it is not a conspiracy, but rather an attempt to "derail a campaign," we got a dozen or so "texts" out of ten thousands "texts" that shows proof that there existed and attempt to "derail a campaign"

No matter how much you attempt to bait and switch, move the goal posts, your efforts still come up short, entertaining, but short, and the always included personal crapola only makes them even more comical

Comey and Mueller are lifetime Republicans. Truth Deflector just says what comes to his alleged mind.

 

[Robo]

We know already you only like people that will lie for your god Trump.

Such as who?

 

[Robo]

I can’t wait for a stupid question like “when did you realize there was NO COLLUSION?” because that’s a fucking lie perpetuated by you illiterate morons. Mueller will straighten idiots like that out in a heartbeat.

Even better, an idiotic “why didn’t you investigate Hillary?”

What do you predict the swamp rat's answers to those questions will be?