Ginsburg dosed off on Obama in 2015. Maybe Obama is the reason they could not find her catnap in their archives! No matter. If a little wine put her on the nod can the grim reaper be far behind?
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...sburg-Grabs-A-Few-Z%92s&p=2870096#post2870096
Here comes Ginsburg’s problematic health again —— problematic for the Parasite Class:
Democrats and hardcore Communists are conspiring to prop up Baby Ruth with embalming fluid if that is what it will take to keep her on the court until a Democrat president can replace her.
Let me remind everyone that then-Senator Orrin Hatch hinted he might willingly step aside if Romney replaced him. Hatch did step aside, and Romney got the seat. That was the definition of chutzpah since Hatch should have been gone after he gave the Communist ACLU a seat on the High Court:
Indeed, let’s also not forget the historical context. In 1993, then-President Clinton reached out to Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), a leading senator on the Judiciary Committee, even though Republicans were in the minority. Clinton solicited suggested nominees for a Supreme Court vacancy, and Hatch recommended Ginsburg. Clinton agreed and Ginsburg sailed through.
This isn’t ancient history; it was just 18 years ago. The radicalization of Republican politics in the years since has been so successful, the scenario itself seems vaguely surreal, if not completely bizarre. I mean, really — a Republican senator, considered conservative by most standards, recommended a Democratic president nominate a liberal ACLU veteran for the Supreme Court? And nearly every Senate Republican went along with this, without any controversy?
This isn’t ancient history; it was just 18 years ago. The radicalization of Republican politics in the years since has been so successful, the scenario itself seems vaguely surreal, if not completely bizarre. I mean, really — a Republican senator, considered conservative by most standards, recommended a Democratic president nominate a liberal ACLU veteran for the Supreme Court? And nearly every Senate Republican went along with this, without any controversy?
August 30, 2011 4:45 PM
It’s amazing Ginsburg is even on the bench
By Steve Benen
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2011/08/30/its-amazing-ginsburg-is-even-on-the-bench/
It’s amazing Ginsburg is even on the bench
By Steve Benen
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2011/08/30/its-amazing-ginsburg-is-even-on-the-bench/
Note that Norman Thomas founded the National Civil Liberties Bureau during WW I which morphed into the ACLU in 1920. Roger Baldwin, one of the ACLU’s founders, and its first director, laid out the ACLU’s judicial philosophy for all time irrespective of the ACLU barring Communists from leadership and staff positions in 1940. Basically, Baldwin realized that controlling the courts was more important in the long run than was keeping a few easily-identified Communists on the ACLU’s payroll.
I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal.
March 24, 2011
ACLU v. Religious Liberty
By J. Matt Barber
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/03/aclu_v_religious_liberty.html
ACLU v. Religious Liberty
By J. Matt Barber
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/03/aclu_v_religious_liberty.html
Barber’s article is a must-read for anybody who believes the ACLU defends the Constitution.
Parenthetically, the NRA never got a child murderer out of jail, nor does the NRA tell people how to live. Americans remain a reasonably free people because of the NRA’s defense of the Second Amendment. The same cannot be said of the ACLU. The ACLU and Democrats are a bigger threat to individual liberty than the NRA ever was or ever will be.