Global Warming Is Freezing You

[signalmankenneth]

http://news.yahoo.com/global-warming-freezing-104500272--politics.html

 

[Celticguy]

Did you have anything to say about whatever is at your url ?

 

[cancel2 2022]

Apparently now the theory is that the colder it gets the more the evidence of global warming.

 

[NOVA]

Apparently now the theory is that the colder it gets the more the evidence of global warming.

Thats the great thing about 'global warming'....no matter what happens, its gb's fault.....similar to our economy and foreign policy.....if it gets fucked up,
its Bush's fault.....If nothing happens, its the Republicans fault.....and if it gets better, its Obama's fault.....

 

[ralfy]

Global warming doesn't exactly refer to increasing heat that makes human beings uncomfortable but very slight increases in global temperature anomaly that in turn affects animals, plants, and the weather.

 

[The Dude]

If the turbo-libs won't drive a volt, I'm not.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Apparently now the theory is that the colder it gets the more the evidence of global warming.

Average temperatures are still increasing. This has lead to more extreme weather events, outliers, in both directions. Pretty common sense.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

If the turbo-libs won't drive a volt, I'm not.

I think one of these days I'm going to change my name to Turbo-Lib.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Average temperatures are still increasing. This has lead to more extreme weather events, outliers, in both directions. Pretty common sense.

Yet hurricanes in 2013 were at a 30 year low, is that due to AGW as well? Pretty common sense.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Global warming doesn't exactly refer to increasing heat that makes human beings uncomfortable but very slight increases in global temperature anomaly that in turn affects animals, plants, and the weather.

Seeing as you like to harp on about BEST, here is a mathematician's analysis

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/21/a-mathematicians-response-to-best/

[url]http://www.informath.org/media/a42.htm
[/URL]

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Seeing as you like to harp on about BEST, here is a mathematician's analysis

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/10/21/a-mathematicians-response-to-best/

Here is my analysis, as a computer scientist: global warming is happening.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Here is my analysis, as a computer scientist: global warming is happening.

I suspect that you are speaking from the viewpoint of a zealot rather than a dispassionate observer. For about the umpteenth time, nobody is really saying that there hasn't been some warming. It is the cause that is at issue. In your capacity as an unemployed computer sceintist where has all the heat gone for the last 17 years?

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Yet hurricanes in 2013 were at a 30 year low, is that due to AGW as well? Pretty common sense.

Yes, the number of Atlantic hurricanes is an accurate measure of the frequency and intensity of all extreme weather patterns worldwide.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

I suspect that you are speaking from the viewpoint of a zealot rather than a dispassionate observer. For about the umpteenth time, nobody is really saying that there hasn't been some warming. It is the cause that is at issue. In your capacity as an unemployed computer sceintist where has all the heat gone for the last 17 years?

It's not happening, it's caused by the sun, and it's a good thing.

 

[cancel2 2022]

It's not happening, it's caused by the sun, and it's a good thing.

There is a very good case that can be made for saying that increased CO2 is a good thing. It increases crop yields and has caused regreening of previously barren areas.

 

[evince]

global warming has never claimed to be changing the tilt of the earth guys.

Don't get youre science from right wing radio jocks

 

[Jarod]

Apparently now the theory is that the colder it gets the more the evidence of global warming.

Actually, weather extremes on both sides has always been part of the theory.

 

[evince]

but he gets his science from Lush Limpballs

 

[cancel2 2022]

Actually, weather extremes on both sides has always been part of the theory.

That's not true. it has become part, out of a desperation to attempt to explain all the inconsistencies.

 

[cancel2 2022]

but he gets his science from Lush Limpballs

I get my science from the likes of Jasper Kirkby, Richard Lindzen and Nir Shaviv, I doubt that you have even heard of them. Then what do you expect from someone that has never even had a full time job let alone a decent education.

Shaviv: 'The IPCC and alike are captives of a wrong conception' -- if the basic premises of a theory are wrong, then there is no improved agreement as more data is collected. In fact, it is usually the opposite that takes place, the disagreement increases. In other words, the above behavior reflects the fact that the IPCC and alike are captives of a wrong conception. This divergence between theory and data exactly describes the the situation over the past several years with the lack of temperature increase...under legitimate scientific behavior, the upper bound would have been decreased in parallel, but not in this case. This is because it would require abandoning the basic premise of a large sensitivity. Since the data requires a low climate sensitivity and since alarmism requires a large climate sensitivity, the "likely range" of climate sensitivity will remain large until the global warming scare will abate.'

'A second important aspect of the present report is that the IPCC is still doing its best to avoid the evidence that the sun has a large effect on climate. They of course will never admit this quantifiable effect because it would completely tear down the line of argumentation for a mostly man-made global warming of a very sensitive climate.'
​

http://www.climatedepot.com/2013/10/09/award-winning-israeli-astrophysicist-dr-n