Goodbye To A Dirty Cop

[Flanders]

Robert Mueller delivered his farewell address like he was Douglas MacArthur giving his farewell address to West Point’s cadets. This is part of what MacArthur told those cadets:

“Duty, Honor, Country: Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be.”
​

https://nationalcenter.org/MacArthurFarewell.html

This is what the dirty cop told Democrats in Congress:

‘Lie, Deceive, Betray: Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be.’




​

 

[Flanders]

This is what the dirty cop told Democrats in Congress:

‘Lie, Deceive, Betray: Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be.’​

​

It’s too soon to tell whether the House will impeach Mr. Trump.


​

Mueller Was Trapped by the Constitution
Editorial of The New York Sun | May 30, 2019

https://www.nysun.com/editorials/mueller-was-trapped-by-the-constitution/90714/
​

Not when you realize that Mueller gave Democrats the tool for a negotiating ploy. DROP THE HILLARY CLINTON INVESTIGATIONS AND WE WILL DROP IMPEACHMENT.

 

[Robo]

​

It’s too soon to tell whether the House will impeach Mr. Trump.


​

Mueller Was Trapped by the Constitution
Editorial of The New York Sun | May 30, 2019

https://www.nysun.com/editorials/mueller-was-trapped-by-the-constitution/90714/
​

Not when you realize that Mueller gave Democrats the tool for a negotiating ploy. DROP THE HILLARY CLINTON INVESTIGATIONS AND WE WILL DROP IMPEACHMENT.

Shouldn't they call Mueller up to testify first? Shouldn't they "FAIRLY" give the Republicans on the committees their "FAIR" shot at questioning his sorry shameful swamp skunk ass before they take up his "NO QUESTIONS" offer to impeach the President?

 

[Gonzomin]

The Dems, not the Repubs, are going to schedule Mueller for a hearing. The Dems want the facts out.
Trump is a crook.

 

[Flanders]

Shouldn't they call Mueller up to testify first?

To Robo: Right on.

Shouldn't they call Mueller up to testify first? Shouldn't they "FAIRLY" give the Republicans on the committees their "FAIR" shot at questioning his sorry shameful swamp skunk ass before they take up his "NO QUESTIONS" offer to impeach the President?

To Robo: More than fair.

p.s. Would it not be lovely to hear a few Republicans open up this line of questioning?

At a certain point, it can’t be mere coincidence that every major figure involved in probing Trump’s campaign is linked to Hillary Clinton in some manner.
​

John Durham Needs To Investigate Why The Info Generating The Mueller Probe Is All Linked To Hillary Clinton
By H.A. Goodman
May 30, 2019

https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/3...nerated-mueller-probe-linked-hillary-clinton/
​

 

[rjhenn]

Robert Mueller delivered his farewell address like he was Douglas MacArthur giving his farewell address to West Point’s cadets. This is part of what MacArthur told those cadets:

“Duty, Honor, Country: Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be.”
​

https://nationalcenter.org/MacArthurFarewell.html

This is what the dirty cop told Democrats in Congress:

‘Lie, Deceive, Betray: Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be.’




​

Trump is the antithesis of MacArthur and "Lie, deceive, betray" is how he's lived his life and is all he'll ever be.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Part Multi 313]

He looks like a cartoon character.

 

[Flanders]

At a certain point, it can’t be mere coincidence that every major figure involved in probing Trump’s campaign is linked to Hillary Clinton in some manner.​

​

Among the questions that need answering:
​

Pat Buchanan puts forth eight questions the public is sick of hearing because they always knew the answers. Not one of Pat’s questions asks about Hillary Clinton:

If, after two years, Mueller found “insufficient evidence” of collusion by Trump, what was the compelling evidence that justified launching the investigation of collusion during the Obama era?

Did that earlier “evidence” turn out to be false allegations and lies?

When did Mueller discover that George Papadopoulos and Carter Page were not agents of the GRU or KGB?

When did Mueller decide there was no collusion or conspiracy?

Was it not until this spring? Or has Mueller known for a good while there was no conspiracy?
​

I disagree with the one answer Pat offers:

Why are these questions important? Because the investigation itself, leaving as it did a cloud over the legitimacy of the president, was damaging not only to Trump but also to the nation. As long as half the country believed Trump was an agent or asset or blackmail victim of Putin, the nation could not come together.
​

Television, and television coverage alone, are responsible for the Democrat Party destroying this country, yet not a word about the entire federal government and their media stooges covering up for Hillary Clinton.

Did Mueller feel no obligation to clear up that false impression as swiftly and fully as possible, if, indeed, he believes it is false?


​

Bob Mueller's toxic mush
Posted By Patrick J. Buchanan On 05/30/2019 @ 4:58 pm

https://www.wnd.com/2019/05/bob-muellers-toxic-mush/
​

​

To this day 3 out of 4 television’s mouth defend Mueller and everything he stands for, while it is easier to find a pearl in canned oysters than it is finding one network that will report the truth 24-7 the same way they report on President Trump:

Robert Mueller’s NOT distinguished, he’s a politician with a sordid history
By S.Noble
May 29, 2019

https://www.independentsentinel.com...ished-hes-a-politician-with-a-sordid-history/

​

 

[rjhenn]

​

Among the questions that need answering:
​

Pat Buchanan puts forth eight questions the public is sick of hearing because they always knew the answers. Not one of Pat’s questions asks about Hillary Clinton:

If, after two years, Mueller found “insufficient evidence” of collusion by Trump, what was the compelling evidence that justified launching the investigation of collusion during the Obama era?

Did that earlier “evidence” turn out to be false allegations and lies?

When did Mueller discover that George Papadopoulos and Carter Page were not agents of the GRU or KGB?

When did Mueller decide there was no collusion or conspiracy?

Was it not until this spring? Or has Mueller known for a good while there was no conspiracy?
​

I disagree with the one answer Pat offers:

Why are these questions important? Because the investigation itself, leaving as it did a cloud over the legitimacy of the president, was damaging not only to Trump but also to the nation. As long as half the country believed Trump was an agent or asset or blackmail victim of Putin, the nation could not come together.
​

Television, and television coverage alone, are responsible for the Democrat Party destroying this country, yet not a word about the entire federal government and their media stooges covering up for Hillary Clinton.

Did Mueller feel no obligation to clear up that false impression as swiftly and fully as possible, if, indeed, he believes it is false?


​

Bob Mueller's toxic mush
Posted By Patrick J. Buchanan On 05/30/2019 @ 4:58 pm

https://www.wnd.com/2019/05/bob-muellers-toxic-mush/
​

​

To this day 3 out of 4 television’s mouth defend Mueller and everything he stands for, while it is easier to find a pearl in canned oysters than it is finding one network that will report the truth 24-7 the same way they report on President Trump:

Robert Mueller’s NOT distinguished, he’s a politician with a sordid history
By S.Noble
May 29, 2019

https://www.independentsentinel.com...ished-hes-a-politician-with-a-sordid-history/

​

Of course, WND is another right-wing propaganda mill. It's the right that's been trying to tear the U.S. apart. First with their unceasing lies about Obama and now with their dogmatic support of Trump.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Gonzomin]

The Repubs set it up so if Mueller does not want to be the star of their dog and pony show, he does not have to. Now you can just refuse to honor subpoenas if you do not want to testify.
Mueller is a private person who just wants to do his job. That is why you did not know what his voice sounded like. His presser was to tell us that he did his job, read the report and leave him alone.

 

[Teflon Don]

All of a sudden leftists are skeered of Mullet testifying

Odd

 

[rjhenn]

All of a sudden leftists are skeered of Mullet testifying

Odd

You've always been terrified of Mueller. Indictment after indictment, and each time: is Trump next?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Flanders]

You've always been terrified of Mueller. Indictment after indictment, and each time: is Trump next?

​

To rjhenn: You must be putting me on!

​

Nothing would give me more pleasure than Mueller testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Note that Schiff and Nadler hint at subpoenaing Mueller to testify where they control the proceedings.

Conversely, Mueller testifying where he has to answer questions posed by Senate conservatives has every Democrat shaking like whores at a prayer meeting.

VIDEO ▼

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6043173998001/#sp=show-clips

After Robert Mueller's brief statement on Wednesday atter the conclusion of the Russia investigation, "Life, Liberty, and Levin" host Mark Levin argued that the special counsel should be ordered to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

On Wednesday, Mueller said that his report would serve as his testimony in regard to the conclusions of his investigation, which did not find that President Trump could be exonerated of obstruction of justice, but could not be indicted either. During an interview with "Fox & Friends" on Friday morning, Levin called on Sen. Lindsey Graham to bring Mueller before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify further.

"The Republicans will have to force him to testify," Levin said.

"Lindsey... call [Mueller] in front of your committee. Subpoena him. Wherever he is retiring to, drag him back.

RUDY GIULIANI: I 'DARE' MUELLER TO TESTIFY AND EXPLAIN WHEN HE FOUND THERE WAS NO COLLUSION

"You don't get to drop bombshells like that, throw Molotov cocktails like that, undermine a president, then go off into the sunset."

Further labeling Mueller a "complete fraud," Levin questioned the special counsel's statement that it was "not an option" for his commitment to pursue an indictment against President Trump due to limitations of the Department of Justice.

"Can you show me where in your report you say you had probable cause to indict a sitting president but because of those memos you couldn't indict him?" Levin asked of Mueller.

Trump's lawyer and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani has also called on Mueller to testify following the conclusion of his investigation and to explain how and when he came to the determination that there was not adequate evidence to prove that President Trump and his administration colluded with Russian forces.
​

Mark Levin: Republicans should 'force' Robert Mueller to testify
Anna Hopkins
2-3 minutes

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mark-levin-republicans-mueller-testify
​

 

[Gonzomin]

Shouldn't they call Mueller up to testify first? Shouldn't they "FAIRLY" give the Republicans on the committees their "FAIR" shot at questioning his sorry shameful swamp skunk ass before they take up his "NO QUESTIONS" offer to impeach the President?

The Repubs have been in power the whole time of Mueller's report. Barr lied about what it said and did to energize rightys who show no resistance to right wing fabrications. It took over 2 months before Mueller could set the record straight. By then, the rightys were repeating Barrs bullshit night and day. The Reds are dirty, but they do understand how propaganda works.
The investigation did not cost any money. They took ill-gotten gains from those they jailed including many millions from Manafort. The investigation was profitable.

 

[rjhenn]

​

To rjhenn: You must be putting me on!

​

Nothing would give me more pleasure than Mueller testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Note that Schiff and Nadler hint at subpoenaing Mueller to testify where they control the proceedings.

Conversely, Mueller testifying where he has to answer questions posed by Senate conservatives has every Democrat shaking like whores at a prayer meeting.

VIDEO ▼

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6043173998001/#sp=show-clips

After Robert Mueller's brief statement on Wednesday atter the conclusion of the Russia investigation, "Life, Liberty, and Levin" host Mark Levin argued that the special counsel should be ordered to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

On Wednesday, Mueller said that his report would serve as his testimony in regard to the conclusions of his investigation, which did not find that President Trump could be exonerated of obstruction of justice, but could not be indicted either. During an interview with "Fox & Friends" on Friday morning, Levin called on Sen. Lindsey Graham to bring Mueller before the Senate Judiciary Committee to testify further.

"The Republicans will have to force him to testify," Levin said.

"Lindsey... call [Mueller] in front of your committee. Subpoena him. Wherever he is retiring to, drag him back.

RUDY GIULIANI: I 'DARE' MUELLER TO TESTIFY AND EXPLAIN WHEN HE FOUND THERE WAS NO COLLUSION

"You don't get to drop bombshells like that, throw Molotov cocktails like that, undermine a president, then go off into the sunset."

Further labeling Mueller a "complete fraud," Levin questioned the special counsel's statement that it was "not an option" for his commitment to pursue an indictment against President Trump due to limitations of the Department of Justice.

"Can you show me where in your report you say you had probable cause to indict a sitting president but because of those memos you couldn't indict him?" Levin asked of Mueller.

Trump's lawyer and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani has also called on Mueller to testify following the conclusion of his investigation and to explain how and when he came to the determination that there was not adequate evidence to prove that President Trump and his administration colluded with Russian forces.
​

Mark Levin: Republicans should 'force' Robert Mueller to testify
Anna Hopkins
2-3 minutes

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mark-levin-republicans-mueller-testify
​

More propaganda from Fox. Mueller found plenty of collusion, but collusion is not an indictable crime. He also found plenty of instances of Trump trying to cover up his collusion with the Russians. That's not indictable only because you can't indict a sitting President. That leaves it up to the House, which won't impeach because the Senate is controlled by Trump cultists.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Gonzomin]

All of a sudden leftists are skeered of Mullet testifying

Odd

No, we are not. the rightys are and they should be.

 

[Flanders]

DROP THE HILLARY CLINTON INVESTIGATIONS AND WE WILL DROP IMPEACHMENT.

Diarrhea Mouth raised the bet when she threw in a big bargaining chip. ‘If Hillary Clinton goes to prison so does Donald Trump.’ The question is will Republicans call or fold?

​

Empty words: Why Pelosi is suddenly saying she wants Trump ‘in prison’
by Becket Adams
June 06, 2019 10:05 AM

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-is-suddenly-saying-she-wants-trump-in-prison
​

 

[Truth Detector]

Robert Mueller delivered his farewell address like he was Douglas MacArthur giving his farewell address to West Point’s cadets. This is part of what MacArthur told those cadets:

“Duty, Honor, Country: Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be.”
​

https://nationalcenter.org/MacArthurFarewell.html

This is what the dirty cop told Democrats in Congress:

‘Lie, Deceive, Betray: Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be, what you will be.’




​

I cannot agree more. He's laughing all the way to the bank. This is what $35 million buys in DC these days.

 

[Truth Detector]

Shouldn't they call Mueller up to testify first? Shouldn't they "FAIRLY" give the Republicans on the committees their "FAIR" shot at questioning his sorry shameful swamp skunk ass before they take up his "NO QUESTIONS" offer to impeach the President?

I would LOVE to see Mueller under oath questioned by the Republican side of the aisle.

 

[Truth Detector]

The Dems, not the Repubs, are going to schedule Mueller for a hearing. The Dems want the facts out.
Trump is a crook.

The Dems hate the truth. That is why they will not be bringing him before the House. You are one misguided low IQ loser.