GOP Senate Candidate: Rape pregnancy the same as out-of-wedlock birth

It's not unreal. It's quite real, and becoming more and more 'acceptable' as justifiable political means to an end.

There are enough backwards-thinking righty religious cavemen that this crap actually has traction and serves as an effective wedge. It gets the nutter voter to the polls.
 
No they are mainstreaming rape. And it's working. YOu can see it on this board.

First you delegitimize some rape. If she's beaten badly and left for dead, you can't compare that to date rape.

See?

Where is this going? To where it used to be; you better be badly beaten and show that you put up a big enough fight that you'd rather die than lose your honor. And you should be a virgin.

Or, let me put it this way:

BILL NAPOLI: "A real-life description to me would be a rape victim, brutally raped, savaged. The girl was a virgin. She was religious. She planned on saving her virginity until she was married. She was brutalized and raped, sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it, and is impregnated. I mean, that girl could be so messed up, physically and psychologically, that carrying that child could very well threaten her life."

She needs to be a religious virgin saving her virginity for marriage.

Otherwise the bitch wanted it. This is how it used to be, this is what they are trying to bring us back to. Dont think we can't go there. Just read Tom's posts and the men defending him.
 
No they are mainstreaming rape. And it's working. YOu can see it on this board.

First you delegitimize some rape. If she's beaten badly and left for dead, you can't compare that to date rape.

See?

Where is this going? To where it used to be; you better be badly beaten and show that you put up a big enough fight that you'd rather die than lose your honor. And you should be a virgin.

Or, let me put it this way:

BILL NAPOLI: "A real-life description to me would be a rape victim, brutally raped, savaged. The girl was a virgin. She was religious. She planned on saving her virginity until she was married. She was brutalized and raped, sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it, and is impregnated. I mean, that girl could be so messed up, physically and psychologically, that carrying that child could very well threaten her life."

She needs to be a religious virgin saving her virginity for marriage.

Otherwise the bitch wanted it. This is how it used to be, this is what they are trying to bring us back to. Dont think we can't go there. Just read Tom's posts and the men defending him.

And don't forget, Sandra Fluke is a slut who fucks for pleasure, not to make babies.
 
No they are mainstreaming rape. And it's working. YOu can see it on this board.

First you delegitimize some rape. If she's beaten badly and left for dead, you can't compare that to date rape.

See?

Where is this going? To where it used to be; you better be badly beaten and show that you put up a big enough fight that you'd rather die than lose your honor. And you should be a virgin.

Or, let me put it this way:

BILL NAPOLI: "A real-life description to me would be a rape victim, brutally raped, savaged. The girl was a virgin. She was religious. She planned on saving her virginity until she was married. She was brutalized and raped, sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it, and is impregnated. I mean, that girl could be so messed up, physically and psychologically, that carrying that child could very well threaten her life."

She needs to be a religious virgin saving her virginity for marriage.

Otherwise the bitch wanted it. This is how it used to be, this is what they are trying to bring us back to. Dont think we can't go there. Just read Tom's posts and the men defending him.

I wonder where they get this from ..

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT: If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker? Answer: God.

Deuteronomy 22:23-24 NAB: If within the city a man comes upon a maiden who is betrothed, and has relations with her, you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death: the girl because she did not cry out for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbors wife.

She didn't cry out for help .. probably because she couldn't .. but stone her to death because she's equally guilty. WTF?

2 Samuel 12:11-14 NAB: Thus says the Lord: 'I will bring evil upon you out of your own house. I will take your wives while you live to see it, and will give them to your neighbor. He shall lie with your wives in broad daylight. You have done this deed in secret, but I will bring it about in the presence of all Israel, and with the sun looking down.'

Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the Lord." Nathan answered David: "The Lord on his part has forgiven your sin: you shall not die. But since you have utterly spurned the Lord by this deed, the child born to you must surely die."


WTF? That is the sickest shit ever passing for holiness.

.. and the child must die????????

Deuteronomy 21:10-14 NAB: When you go out to war against your enemies and the LORD, your God, delivers them into your hand, so that you take captives, if you see a comely woman among the captives and become so enamored of her that you wish to have her as wife, you may take her home to your house. But before she may live there, she must shave her head and pare her nails and lay aside her captive's garb. After she has mourned her father and mother for a full month, you may have relations with her, and you shall be her husband and she shall be your wife. However, if later on you lose your liking for her, you shall give her her freedom, if she wishes it; but you shall not sell her or enslave her, since she was married to you under compulsion.

Kill her father and mother and let her mourn for a month .. Then Ye' can rape the shit out of her .. and when you get tired of her, release her to the streets.

Zechariah 14:1-2 NAB: Lo, a day shall come for the Lord when the spoils shall be divided in your midst. And I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem for battle: the city shall be taken, houses plundered, women ravished; half of the city shall go into exile, but the rest of the people shall not be removed from the city.

Numbers 31:31-40: 31 So Moses and Eleazar the priest did as the Lord commanded Moses.

32 The plunder remaining from everything the fighting men had taken totaled 675,000 sheep and goats, 33 72,000 cattle, 34 61,000 donkeys, 35 and 32,000 virgin girls. (They killed everybody but virgin girls)

36 Half of the plunder was given to the fighting men. It totaled 337,500 sheep and goats, 37 of which 675 were the Lord’s share; 38 36,000 cattle, of which 72 were the Lord’s share; 39 30,500 donkeys, of which 61 were the Lord’s share; 40 and 16,000 virgin girls, of whom 32 were the Lord’s share.

Proof positive that their God has a dick.
 
No they are mainstreaming rape. And it's working. YOu can see it on this board.

First you delegitimize some rape. If she's beaten badly and left for dead, you can't compare that to date rape.

See?

Where is this going? To where it used to be; you better be badly beaten and show that you put up a big enough fight that you'd rather die than lose your honor. And you should be a virgin.

Or, let me put it this way:

BILL NAPOLI: "A real-life description to me would be a rape victim, brutally raped, savaged. The girl was a virgin. She was religious. She planned on saving her virginity until she was married. She was brutalized and raped, sodomized as bad as you can possibly make it, and is impregnated. I mean, that girl could be so messed up, physically and psychologically, that carrying that child could very well threaten her life."

She needs to be a religious virgin saving her virginity for marriage.

Otherwise the bitch wanted it. This is how it used to be, this is what they are trying to bring us back to. Dont think we can't go there. Just read Tom's posts and the men defending him.

Darla, I am not trying to start shit, but do you not see degrees of horror involved in almost any crime? That does not mean the one that is less horrible is condoned. Rape is always wrong, but sometimes it is more brutal than other times. I don't think that means I am apologizing for any rapist. Nor do I think that I am saying she wanted it.
 
Darla, I am not trying to start shit, but do you not see degrees of horror involved in almost any crime? That does not mean the one that is less horrible is condoned. Rape is always wrong, but sometimes it is more brutal than other times. I don't think that means I am apologizing for any rapist. Nor do I think that I am saying she wanted it.

Seriously, I am too exhausted, and disheartened now.

I can't do this anymore tonight and I think I"ve had it for a while.

Look up the history of rape and how rape was dismissed. It's not like other crimes.

Sometimes I feel so despondent for women, and other times I look at polls and I realize, fuck it, we are goign to kick the shit out of all of you.

I wonder if you will learn then?

Rape is rape. I don't think we need to be parsing it. - President Obama.

And why I'm voting for him. WIth every post you and that bag of shit Sf and Gatorman make, I am happier to vote for him.

It's come to this; a man getting that is significant enough now that it says something really decent about him.
 
Seriously, I am too exhausted, and disheartened now.

I can't do this anymore tonight and I think I"ve had it for a while.

Look up the history of rape and how rape was dismissed. It's not like other crimes.

Sometimes I feel so despondent for women, and other times I look at polls and I realize, fuck it, we are goign to kick the shit out of all of you.

I wonder if you will learn then?

Rape is rape. I don't think we need to be parsing it. - President Obama.

And why I'm voting for him. WIth every post you and that bag of shit Sf and Gatorman make, I am happier to vote for him.

It's come to this; a man getting that is significant enough now that it says something really decent about him.

I'll tell you why I am so focused on this. My first wife was abused as a child. Not just mild stuff, but horrible, vicious sexual assaults. Like many victims of this sort of abuse, she buried the memories until she was almost 30 and had been in a secure, loving relationship for years.

One of her treatments (I think saved her life) involved joining a group and participating in groups sessions. The therapist was careful to make sure everyone understood that they were all abused, and none was worse than any other. My wife showed improvement for several months, and then began to be more despondent and less enthusiastic about the group. Since I am male, she had difficulty discussing the issues with me. But I learned that she was mainly despondent because she wasn't making the progress that the other women were. She thought something was wrong with her because she hadn't moved on to other steps in the healing process.

The problem was not with her. While the other women were healing from being fondled as a child, my wife was still remembering more and more. Her earliest memory involved being raped, sodomized, and burned with cigarettes against a stone wall in the basement of her childhood home. The problem is, that wall collapsed when she was no more than 5 years old. Her last memory of being abused was from when she was in middle school. She endured at least 10 years of sick, vile and violent abuse. And now she was being told there are no degrees of abuse. The woman who was fondled twice by a neighborhood boy had faced the same abuse my wife had?

It took a lot of therapy to get her to see her situation was not like everyone else's. That does not mean that the abuse of the other woman was not wrong, disgusting and perverted. But the depth of the scars and the horrors she faced should never have been minimalized.

I am not talking about calling date rape something other than rape. I am not talking about letting men off the hook for what they do. I am talking about minimalizing a woman who may have been disfigured, rendered sterile, spent weeks in a hospital from the injuries she suffered and even been left for dead. Yes, the women who were raped when they were asleep are victims of rape. And the men who did it should pay the same price as any rapist. But the women who went thru violent, life-threatening gang rapes should not be told their horrors are the same as a woman who woke up with a dick inside her.

Its not about the crime, it is about the victim.
 
I'll tell you why I am so focused on this. My first wife was abused as a child. Not just mild stuff, but horrible, vicious sexual assaults. Like many victims of this sort of abuse, she buried the memories until she was almost 30 and had been in a secure, loving relationship for years.

One of her treatments (I think saved her life) involved joining a group and participating in groups sessions. The therapist was careful to make sure everyone understood that they were all abused, and none was worse than any other. My wife showed improvement for several months, and then began to be more despondent and less enthusiastic about the group. Since I am male, she had difficulty discussing the issues with me. But I learned that she was mainly despondent because she wasn't making the progress that the other women were. She thought something was wrong with her because she hadn't moved on to other steps in the healing process.

The problem was not with her. While the other women were healing from being fondled as a child, my wife was still remembering more and more. Her earliest memory involved being raped, sodomized, and burned with cigarettes against a stone wall in the basement of her childhood home. The problem is, that wall collapsed when she was no more than 5 years old. Her last memory of being abused was from when she was in middle school. She endured at least 10 years of sick, vile and violent abuse. And now she was being told there are no degrees of abuse. The woman who was fondled twice by a neighborhood boy had faced the same abuse my wife had?

It took a lot of therapy to get her to see her situation was not like everyone else's. That does not mean that the abuse of the other woman was not wrong, disgusting and perverted. But the depth of the scars and the horrors she faced should never have been minimalized.

I am not talking about calling date rape something other than rape. I am not talking about letting men off the hook for what they do. I am talking about minimalizing a woman who may have been disfigured, rendered sterile, spent weeks in a hospital from the injuries she suffered and even been left for dead. Yes, the women who were raped when they were asleep are victims of rape. And the men who did it should pay the same price as any rapist. But the women who went thru violent, life-threatening gang rapes should not be told their horrors are the same as a woman who woke up with a dick inside her.

Its not about the crime, it is about the victim.

Alright let me take this one last one before I go, because I think it's important that I answer this, for my ownself.

Let me blunt: I don't give a shit, and how dare you.

You don't know my experiences or the experience of any woman on this board.

You are dismissing the long history of rape in our culture being dismissed as not rape because the woman was not badly beaten, along with the untold damage that did to women over the decades. Or how many survived it.

Everyone reacts differently to trauma. It is for that reason that trauma cannot be quantified. No woman has to be made to feel badly about her experience so that your wife can feel better about hers.

Believe me her problem was never that other women's rapes were being given too much gravitas. How seriously strange for you to suggest that it was.
 
Alright let me take this one last one before I go, because I think it's important that I answer this, for my ownself.

Let me blunt: I don't give a shit, and how dare you.

You don't know my experiences or the experience of any woman on this board.

You are dismissing the long history of rape in our culture being dismissed as not rape because the woman was not badly beaten, along with the untold damage that did to women over the decades. Or how many survived it.

Everyone reacts differently to trauma. It is for that reason that trauma cannot be quantified. No woman has to be made to feel badly about her experience so that your wife can feel better about hers.

Believe me her problem was never that other women's rapes were being given too much gravitas. How seriously strange for you to suggest that it was.

How dare I? And yet, you somehow proclaim what she felt and why? Nice.

See, I am not downplaying anyone's experience. But to suggest that a woman who was beaten and gangraped went thru the same thing as a woman who woke up with a dick inside her is to ignore the consequences of the violence.
 
How dare I? And yet, you somehow proclaim what she felt and why? Nice.

See, I am not downplaying anyone's experience. But to suggest that a woman who was beaten and gangraped went thru the same thing as a woman who woke up with a dick inside her is to ignore the consequences of the violence.

Says who? You?
 
How dare I? And yet, you somehow proclaim what she felt and why? Nice.

See, I am not downplaying anyone's experience. But to suggest that a woman who was beaten and gangraped went thru the same thing as a woman who woke up with a dick inside her is to ignore the consequences of the violence.

I am not claiming what she felt. Since forcible was JUST ONLY dropped from the FBI's definition of rape, and your story takes place over many years in HISTORY, it is not possible that any of her problems were due to dropping that word so that the FBI could now compile rape statistics which include drugged rape and male rape among other things. Simply not possible.

But I will state that no woman's problems ever stemmed from the rapes of other women being taken too seriously. Absolutely. It is twisted to even imply otherwise.

Your nice little bullshit leaves out the women who killed themselves over the years because their rape wasn't really rape rape.
 
I am not claiming what she felt. Since forcible was JUST ONLY dropped from the FBI's definition of rape, and your story takes place over many years in HISTORY, it is not possible that any of her problems were due to dropping that word so that the FBI could now compile rape statistics which include drugged rape and male rape among other things. Simply not possible.

But I will state that no woman's problems ever stemmed from the rapes of other women being taken too seriously. Absolutely. It is twisted to even imply otherwise.

Your nice little bullshit leaves out the women who killed themselves over the years because their rape wasn't really rape rape.

Please point out where I EVER have argued that "forcible" should have stayed in the definition of rape.

My bullshit? Nice to see that only your views matter.
 
i am not aware of our culture downplaying rape simply because there was no violence.

i think bijou and darla and off their rocker.
 
I typed those words, yes. I also am basing my opinion on real life experiences with the consequences of sexual molestation and the healing (or lack thereof) of the victim.

That's all well and good, but regardless of your own molestation experience, you are not qualified to determine the degree of trauma someone else experiences.
 
That's all well and good, but regardless of your own molestation experience, you are not qualified to determine the degree of trauma someone else experiences.

I am not trying to do so. I am simply pointing out that there are differing levels of violence in rapes. I do not believe that should be ignored.
 
Back
Top